https://ratings.****************/content/arb007
Thoughts?
Just to keep pace with you kids, I listened to the WTDY stream a week or so back.
You know, just to check in on the CHR / Hot AC thing.
The music was 'shrug', as expected. Maybe a :15 listen at most.
The SPOT break was interesting, though. Two of them mentioned a 'Route 6'. Onliest Route6 I know isn't near Philadelphia. And there were two ads that mentioned Wilkes-Barre. Most of the other spots were anonymous 1-800 numbers.
Fwiw : Audacy runs the top-rated Wilkes-Barre / Scranton station, WKRZ.
WTDY's programmers must have my IP address, or the last 9 digits of my SS number in order to customize the music nd stop sets for us Coal Country mokes. The spot breaks were really tight, though. Well done.
WDAS is the only R&B station in philadelphiaI'm intrigued by WTDY and WRNB's bounces. They didn't seem to come at great expense of Q102 and WDAS.
WIP FALLING during Eagles season is remarkable. (Then again, the team isn't giving us something to cheer about)
Otherwise, a nice Classic/Adult Hits battle between WOGL and WBEN, a nice News battle between KYW and WHYY, and the AC battle between WBEB and WISX is still solid, even with about a point gap in the vanity numbers. Everyone else has settled into a general zone of where their ratings are going to fall.
I mean... "R&B" is literally part of their positioning statement (100.3 Philly's R&B & Hip Hop), but yes, since they merged the Hip Hop of 103.9 in with 100.3, it hasn't been a straight R&B station.WDAS is the only R&B station in philadelphia
I'm intrigued by WTDY and WRNB's bounces. They didn't seem to come at great expense of Q102 and WDAS.
We are seeing lots more instability due to the pandemic. First, it has become harder to recruit meter families; each age, gender, geographic and ethic cell is supposed to be 100% proportional in the sample, but Nielsen has had lots of sample issues. Second, the semiconductor shortage has cut down the supply of replacement meters, so even when they find the right sample, they don't have enough new meters.WTDY also jumped from #7 to a tie for #3 in 18-34.
And yet advertisers swallow these numbers unquestioningly because no one has come up with a better system?We are seeing lots more instability due to the pandemic. First, it has become harder to recruit meter families; each age, gender, geographic and ethic cell is supposed to be 100% proportional in the sample, but Nielsen has had lots of sample issues. Second, the semiconductor shortage has cut down the supply of replacement meters, so even when they find the right sample, they don't have enough new meters.
So stations that appeal to the harder to recruit cells tend to wobble. Start with 18-34 men and then look at younger ethnic households and pretty soon you see why some PPM markets were not accredited even before the pandemic.
The system is good enough for advertisers who deal with soft numbers all the time. And this is why advertisers who use ratings use multi-book averages, not single books.And yet advertisers swallow these numbers unquestioningly because no one has come up with a better system?
Interesting to read that, in 18-34, WTDY landed 3rd (tied with WXTU) and actually beat Q102. The article I read didn't say where Q102 landed but just filling in the gaps, I'd assume they were in 6th, 7th, or 8th place.I'm intrigued by WTDY and WRNB's bounces. They didn't seem to come at great expense of Q102 and WDAS.