• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

94.7 is changing formats today

It seems that the core NY Country airstaff will be sticking around in Audacy. The station's old site has been retro-fitted for the new HD2 format and the schedule still lists Katie & Company, Jesse Addy and Kelly Ford's weekend shows, as well as WYCD's Rob & Holly. Good for Audacy in keeping those guys around in some fashion.

They're under contract. Audacy can pay them to stay home or pay them to work. They all have something to do, at least for the time being. Jesse also VTs a shift on their Miami country station. They may add a shift to Kelly's schedule for the time being.

Then at some point they have to review this national approach to country. Sure it saved them money, but did it help MAKE them money? Were they able to profit from having a larger platform? From what I can see, the answer is no. But maybe they can figure out a way to make it pay.
 
One does not exclude the other. Also older music is popular to a younger audience. If the music is in the same style it could be a fresh touch to all those 90's throwbacks.
 
I like pop top 40 & country top 40.
If this wouldve happened yrs ago i wouldve been devastated like when y107 ended.
But now between siriusxm & amazon music its i couldnt care less.
 
What does this have to do with 94.7 changing formats? Last I checked, WNSH's signal didn't reach up to Erie County.
Nothing. If you read the post, it was about the 107.7 signal in Western NY. Another person mentioned that it reaches rural areas. That's true, but very people live there.

Audacy gave up on the format in NYC because it doesn't make money there...
 
Because LA has more viable commercial FMs than NYC, shares are more fragmented and so a 2 share, give or take, with country does not look so bad.
Is that because NYC has more non commercial fms ie. WBAI, WNYC, WPLJ or are you saying less radio stations perhaps due to shorter spacing because of geography, less height, wattage etc. ?
 
Is that because NYC has more non commercial fms ie. WBAI, WNYC, WPLJ or are you saying less radio stations perhaps due to shorter spacing because of geography, less height, wattage etc. ?
Aren't New York and Los Angeles both in class B FM territory? And LA signals like 102.3, 103.1, and 103.9 are class A signals. No different than 92.7 or 103.9 in NYC. Plus, Queens is within the 60 dBu of WKJY 98.3.
 
  • Like
Reactions: djl
Audacy gave up on the (Country) format in NYC because it doesn't make money there
There's a reason it's called "Country" music, not City music. The format has never worked in NYC and it was never going to this time either.

What's disappointing to me is yet another flip to a format playing >20-year-old songs. Here's what I said just last week in the KITS thread on the San Francisco board:
It seems like every broadcaster just wants those 45-year-old passive listeners who are satisfied hearing stuff they grew up with on the radio 20-30 years ago. Trouble is they don't want to invest in formats that build future audiences, they just want the instant gratification of making money now with the most lucrative middle-aged money demo. Well 10-15 years from now those listeners will age out of the money demo and the broadcasters will find themselves unable to attract new listeners because all those people they're ignoring today will have no interest in FM radio whatsoever, they're growing up in an era where streaming services provide a much better alternative.

So here we go again with Audacy chasing the low-hanging middle-aged fruit instead of innovating. You just kicked the Country audience to the curb where plenty of them will turn to Spotify etc., and never come back. Understandable, but now you're still not giving anyone 18-34 a reason to be interested in radio either. So that kills two birds with one stone as far as investing in the future of FM radio which happens to be your core business. Nice job.
 
None of those stations are going to show up in the NYC books lol
So that’s why listeners are prefer streaming country stations in the Hudson Valley and Albany rather than what it was used to be on 94.7. Streaming country stations is better than country stations on terrestrial radio.
 
Then at some point they have to review this national approach to country. Sure it saved them money, but did it help MAKE them money? Were they able to profit from having a larger platform? From what I can see, the answer is no. But maybe they can figure out a way to make it pay.
I'm doubtful they'd make any changes on the programming side like...I dunno...bringing back live and local talent? I'd guess they'll do the usual corporate radio thing and "explore new synergies" while "expanding our ability to generate quality content" and "serve our clients and listeners in new and exciting ways!" In other words, do more with even less. The holidays are coming up. Maybe they'll do a "reduction in force" like iHeart is known for.
 
So that kills two birds with one stone as far as investing in the future of FM radio which happens to be your core business. Nice job.

You're assuming it's still their core business. Why did they change their name? What did they say when they became Audacy?

“We have transformed into a fundamentally different and dramatically enhanced organization and so it is time to embrace a new name and brand identity which better reflects who we have become and our vision for the future,” said David Field, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Audacy.

I don't see where they say FM radio is their core business. Remember that radio companies don't actually own the frequencies, but are licensees. The government owns the FM band and determines what these companies can do. If 18-34 wants to stream, Audacy owns a streaming platform. You want innovation? Look at their podcasting options.

When you look at the Top 5 radio stations 18-34, you see Hot and Lite. That's what the millennials listen to on FM. Z-100 is #6.
 
WNSH had live & local talent. When Audacy bought the station, they dropped the syndicated stuff and replaced it with live & local. How did that work out?
Was that their national approach? I was responding to your point about whether or not they were going to rethink their national approach, which (if I remember correctly) was to replace local talent with tracked shows from elsewhere.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom