Of course not, I'm not that daft. Audacy clearly sees the value in having them around still in some capacity for their national offerings. I'm sure they will be relocated full-time in another Audacy market.It’s not because of the HD2.
Of course not, I'm not that daft. Audacy clearly sees the value in having them around still in some capacity for their national offerings. I'm sure they will be relocated full-time in another Audacy market.It’s not because of the HD2.
It seems that the core NY Country airstaff will be sticking around in Audacy. The station's old site has been retro-fitted for the new HD2 format and the schedule still lists Katie & Company, Jesse Addy and Kelly Ford's weekend shows, as well as WYCD's Rob & Holly. Good for Audacy in keeping those guys around in some fashion.
They playing 80's but not the hiphop/rap 80's so it doesn't hurt CBS if they throw in a couple of 80's tracks.They play 80s on WCBS. This station is 90s/2000s. Different audience, different sales demo.
They playing 80's but not the hiphop/rap 80's so it doesn't hurt CBS if they throw in a couple of 80's tracks.
One does not exclude the other. Also older music is popular to a younger audience. If the music is in the same style it could be a fresh touch to all those 90's throwbacks.
Wait and see how they tweaking in the weeks to come. This is only the beginning.This is the music list they're playing. They'll play it for a few months and assess the response.
Nothing. If you read the post, it was about the 107.7 signal in Western NY. Another person mentioned that it reaches rural areas. That's true, but very people live there.What does this have to do with 94.7 changing formats? Last I checked, WNSH's signal didn't reach up to Erie County.
Is that because NYC has more non commercial fms ie. WBAI, WNYC, WPLJ or are you saying less radio stations perhaps due to shorter spacing because of geography, less height, wattage etc. ?Because LA has more viable commercial FMs than NYC, shares are more fragmented and so a 2 share, give or take, with country does not look so bad.
They’ll slowly add more. Give it some time. Hopefully there are more NYC centric acts that will be added (just not on high spins).Song added to overall playlist since 3 AM Sat. 10/23/2021:
10:07 am Take Care - Drake ft. Rihanna
Aren't New York and Los Angeles both in class B FM territory? And LA signals like 102.3, 103.1, and 103.9 are class A signals. No different than 92.7 or 103.9 in NYC. Plus, Queens is within the 60 dBu of WKJY 98.3.Is that because NYC has more non commercial fms ie. WBAI, WNYC, WPLJ or are you saying less radio stations perhaps due to shorter spacing because of geography, less height, wattage etc. ?
There's a reason it's called "Country" music, not City music. The format has never worked in NYC and it was never going to this time either.Audacy gave up on the (Country) format in NYC because it doesn't make money there
It seems like every broadcaster just wants those 45-year-old passive listeners who are satisfied hearing stuff they grew up with on the radio 20-30 years ago. Trouble is they don't want to invest in formats that build future audiences, they just want the instant gratification of making money now with the most lucrative middle-aged money demo. Well 10-15 years from now those listeners will age out of the money demo and the broadcasters will find themselves unable to attract new listeners because all those people they're ignoring today will have no interest in FM radio whatsoever, they're growing up in an era where streaming services provide a much better alternative.
So that’s why listeners are prefer streaming country stations in the Hudson Valley and Albany rather than what it was used to be on 94.7. Streaming country stations is better than country stations on terrestrial radio.None of those stations are going to show up in the NYC books lol
I'm doubtful they'd make any changes on the programming side like...I dunno...bringing back live and local talent? I'd guess they'll do the usual corporate radio thing and "explore new synergies" while "expanding our ability to generate quality content" and "serve our clients and listeners in new and exciting ways!" In other words, do more with even less. The holidays are coming up. Maybe they'll do a "reduction in force" like iHeart is known for.Then at some point they have to review this national approach to country. Sure it saved them money, but did it help MAKE them money? Were they able to profit from having a larger platform? From what I can see, the answer is no. But maybe they can figure out a way to make it pay.
So that kills two birds with one stone as far as investing in the future of FM radio which happens to be your core business. Nice job.
“We have transformed into a fundamentally different and dramatically enhanced organization and so it is time to embrace a new name and brand identity which better reflects who we have become and our vision for the future,” said David Field, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Audacy.
I'm doubtful they'd make any changes on the programming side like...I dunno...bringing back live and local talent?
Was that their national approach? I was responding to your point about whether or not they were going to rethink their national approach, which (if I remember correctly) was to replace local talent with tracked shows from elsewhere.WNSH had live & local talent. When Audacy bought the station, they dropped the syndicated stuff and replaced it with live & local. How did that work out?