Surprised Larry Patrick didn't approach them, or if he did I wonder if they took a pass given what he did in Sacramento with Entercom. EMF is always ready to expand coverage, in San Francisco's case, that would be Air1
Surprised Larry Patrick didn't approach them, or if he did I wonder if they took a pass given what he did in Sacramento with Entercom. EMF is always ready to expand coverage, in San Francisco's case, that would be Air1
Either EMF, Lazer Media or Lotus Communications are some to think of for potential buyers. Lotus does not own any radio properties in the Bay Area.
The signal does adequately not cover any of the HDHA areas for the San Francisco MSA so neither Lotus nor Lazer would likely have any interest. This is a tiny signal in what is a geographically huge market. It has a 65 dbu signal in about 26% of the total market population.Either EMF, Lazer Media or Lotus Communications are some to think of for potential buyers. Lotus does not own any radio properties in the Bay Area.
And it does not cover Lotus' primary target market, Hispanics.The problem for Lotus is it would be a single station operation, which is not very efficient in today's marketplace.
At least he was running entertainment formats, unlike the propaganda VCY would spew. There may be no winners here but I hope Ed prevails and then sells to a better operator.
The issue is that no "real entertainment company" would buy this highly deficient signal which can not compete with anything but a niche format.It needs to go to a real entertainment company. If he can't find anyone besides a religious broadcaster to buy this FM station in Market #4 and the most liberal city in the nation, then Radio really does have one foot in the grave and the other one right behind it.
Better EMF than VCY America. As parasitic on the spectrum as EMF is, they don't air extremist right-wing religious programming.Great idea, just don't sell it to EMF.
Other people have money, but may not want to invest in a medium that is slowly dying. EMF sees it as god’s calling.who has else the money and a viable.. and time and would want coverage bad enough to put up with any crap stolz may throw their way?
It's EMF.. or maybe an ethnic broadcaster.
Thats it
Not one else has the money
Nor do they wanna deal with Stolz
Other people have money, but may not want to invest in a medium that is slowly dying. EMF sees it as god’s calling.
That becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy then. The lack of money sort of furthers the demise. What it takes is someone like Jeff Bezos who invests millions of his own money in a newspaper that keeps the medium afloat.
There are such people in San Francisco, who actually live in the core reach area for the signal, who could easily combine this signal with other online properties to create a more visible curated content service.
Some translators, which have 1000' or higher antenna systems, cover better than a Class A.That's funny this 6,000 watt signal is so useless but broadcasters can't seem to stop putting piddly little translators with the range of a pea shooter on the air and bragging about their new full market formats.
Some translators, which have 1000' or higher antenna systems, cover better than a Class A.
Markets are not made of cities. They are made of counties, and that signal only covers a little over a quarter of the market well.The point is that the signal reaches the city of San Francisco and its near suburbs with a city grade signal. This is a top-5 market and a signal like that should have value if the radio business is still healthy.
There are better signals in both of the main dialects, as well as several other Asian languages The market is 24% Asian, but not all speak any language but English and there are a number of significant Asian language used by first generation immigrants, ranging from Chinese to Tagalog to Hindi.You mentioned the signal could be used for an Asian format and I don't disagree with that. The Chinese population in San Francisco is over 20 percent, maybe even higher than that in the urban city center where KREV's signal is best. That's a pretty big "niche". I'm not in the market so I don't know what outlets may already exist to serve them, though.
Let's see... WLTW reaches 3,200,000 persons weekly and each spot reaches an average of 45,000 persons.I'm of the belief that the ONLY way radio will survive is if it finds a new revenue stream. Because all of this reliance on markets and demos and advertisers is simply becoming obsolete, and it's bringing radio down with it. Most radio stations will simply NEVER be good platforms for advertising.
For mass appeal advertising campaigns, radio is the closest to point of purchase. At this moment, it is a valuable ad medium.