• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Keeping The Bills in Buffalo

Wow! Just goes to show Buddy not only embarrasses himself on these boards. Now he’s doing it in the Buffalo News. Why he would get involved in this controversy is beyond me. I’m thinking true Bills fans who read this just might boycott the Big WECK! The News editorial is spot on! If the state and county had stonewalled on a new stadium, the Bills would have left. Simple as that! We can debate the pros and cons of the stadium deal. But make no mistake. The Bills leaving Western New York would be devastating to hundreds of thousands of people here.

Yes, other cities succeed without NFL franchises. Yet I saw an interesting comment today from someone commenting on the News editorial. It resonated. When he goes to a game at Highmark Stadium on a Sunday afternoon, he does so with the realization that Buffalo is just one of 16 cities across the nation hosting an NFL game that particular weekend. You’re wrong, Buddy! If the Bills left, I wouldn’t root for another team. I’d largely stop watching pro football games. And I know there are more people like me than you.

What a ridiculous argument that the local economy shuts down when the Bills are playing. Malls are open. Restaurants are serving, many with the Bills games on their TVs. Sure, I’ve seen video of a Wegmans being empty on Sunday afternoons. But the day before or morning of, you couldn’t find a parking space because of shoppers buying for their Bills game day parties. Truthfully, show me data of how our local economy is dependent on what happens on a Sunday afternoon/night or a Monday night when most Bills games are played.

The Bills‘ TV rating falls anywhere from the mid 40s to lower 50s. Nothing else on Buffalo TV/radio comes close. That’s evidence enough of the Bills’ importance to our region!

So, I’ll say it again, Buddy! Stop embarrassing yourself! This letter to the editor gives me further ammunition to just not listen to your station. In fact, I wonder what your advertisers think about this!
 
Taxpayers should not be funding this at all. If we do, we should get a dividend on profit.

Mark1981, stop being such a weakling. Why didn’t YOU write an article expressing your views. ?

Embarrassing myself? I’m correct! Read the other responses to that news article.

I don’t think being taxed more for a billionaires team is fair. Sorry. We pay enough taxes here.

Polls show that most would agree with me. Citizens are not happy with having our taxes raised for this. Did you know you have to pay a fee to even qualify to buy a ticket!

Malls , retails stores, events, are packed on Sundays when the Bills play? Totally false. I work with many of these company that lose a ton of money on Sundays.

Taxing people even more for this is nuts. We need to cut taxes, not raise them.
 
According to recent polls, the majority of people in NY state are against this proposed stadium deal. It's a very bad deal for taxpayers. The Bills ownership knows they can suck the area dry. They won't even contribute enough to build a dome. Another open air stadium in Buffalo is absurd. Fans "fanatics" cannot think logically. Most of the players have zero connection to Buffalo. Very few live there year round.

Buddy is entitled to his opinion on this issue and many agree with him. If this stadium deal actually happens, most people won't be happy. Buffalo seems to have an inferiority complex. San Diego told the NFL to screw off and life went on there quite nicely. Must be the weather...
 
Last edited:
Wow! Just goes to show Buddy not only embarrasses himself on these boards. Now he’s doing it in the Buffalo News. Why he would get involved in this controversy is beyond me.
Because he cares about Buffalo and knows that the city is more than the team.
I’m thinking true Bills fans who read this just might boycott the Big WECK! The News editorial is spot on! If the state and county had stonewalled on a new stadium, the Bills would have left. Simple as that! We can debate the pros and cons of the stadium deal. But make no mistake. The Bills leaving Western New York would be devastating to hundreds of thousands of people here.
Not necessarily. And that is a valid point as there are many similarly sized cities that do just fine without an NFL team.
Yes, other cities succeed without NFL franchises.
My point, exactly.
Yet I saw an interesting comment today from someone commenting on the News editorial. It resonated. When he goes to a game at Highmark Stadium on a Sunday afternoon, he does so with the realization that Buffalo is just one of 16 cities across the nation hosting an NFL game that particular weekend. You’re wrong, Buddy! If the Bills left, I wouldn’t root for another team. I’d largely stop watching pro football games. And I know there are more people like me than you.
But that does not kill the market. It just changes sports alliances.
What a ridiculous argument that the local economy shuts down when the Bills are playing. Malls are open. Restaurants are serving, many with the Bills games on their TVs. Sure, I’ve seen video of a Wegmans being empty on Sunday afternoons. But the day before or morning of, you couldn’t find a parking space because of shoppers buying for their Bills game day parties.
I ran the originating station for the Seminoles in Tallahassee years ago and the fact is that when there was a home game, the entire city was different for a whole weekend.
Truthfully, show me data of how our local economy is dependent on what happens on a Sunday afternoon/night or a Monday night when most Bills games are played.

The Bills‘ TV rating falls anywhere from the mid 40s to lower 50s. Nothing else on Buffalo TV/radio comes close. That’s evidence enough of the Bills’ importance to our region!
For one day... how many times a year? Versus the cost of the stadium, policing, processing drunk drivers and all the rest...
So, I’ll say it again, Buddy! Stop embarrassing yourself! This letter to the editor gives me further ammunition to just not listen to your station. In fact, I wonder what your advertisers think about this!
I'd say that Buddy has the right kind of community spirit and is able to balance economics and emotion quite decisively.
 
Taxpayers should not be funding this at all. If we do, we should get a dividend on profit.

The taxpayers don't own the team. So the taxpayers don't get a share of the team's profit.

This deal is for the stadium, not the team. The stadium can be used for other things, and those other things might lead to a profit.

But government is not intended to be a profit-making enterprise, so there will be no profits. The revenues will be plowed back into operations of the stadium.


Here's how the governor explained how it will make back its money:

The governor’s office said the projected tax revenue and overall economic impact from the stadium would more than offset the public contribution

This deal is being described as a public-private partnership, which is exactly how the FCC views its relationship with radio station owners. The public owns the spectrum, the private companies own the license to operate the facility. Using your logic, the taxpayers should get a share of Radio One's profits. But the taxpayers don't own your station, just as the taxpayers don't own the Buffalo Bills. That's why taxpayers are not entitled to profits from the team. These kinds of things are popular around the country, and in New York State:


But sure, if it makes you feel better, you should campaign against the Erie county politicians who voted for this money. Make it an election issue. See who wins. Will you accept the decision of the people?
 
For one day... how many times a year? Versus the cost of the stadium, policing, processing drunk drivers and all the rest...

My city uses it's stadium for many more events per year than just football games. They hold concerts there. The lease the stadium out to area college teams. Some high schools hold their championship games there. There are lots of uses for a stadium, and the county controls the revenues from all of those other uses.
 
Dave Fields of WYRK has a different view of this situation. He works at a competing radio station.


The main and only reason you should want to build a stadium in Buffalo is that all the money that is generated by the team stays in New York. The New York Jets and Giants don't play in New York. Their stadium is located in New Jersey so all the money generated on game day and all the taxes that the teams pay goes into the coffers of New Jersey.

All the money that will be generated on game day and other events at the stadium throughout the year is taxed and that money stays in New York. Plus the players are taxed and that money is sent to Albany as well since the Buffalo Bills are located in New York State.

So while your tax dollars won't go to your favorite NFL team, the money that the Buffalo Bills make during the season and the money generated during the year stays right here in New York.

So while you may disapprove of using public money for the stadium, at least you will get a return on your "investment" since the Buffalo Bills are the only NFL that plays in the state of New York.



Read More: Open Letter To Downstate Residents Who Oppose The New Bills Stadi | Open Letter To Downstate Residents Who Oppose The New Bills Stadium
 
The argument that the Bills are the only team that plays in NY is ridiculous. It's the little brother having a tantrum. New York city has something like 7 million people. That dwarfs the population of Buffalo. NY city is also the #1 TV market. The Meadowlands complex is just over the state line.

The Bills rely on customers from many parts of the state and Canada to be viable. The fact that they rank dead last in terms of "franchise value" to the NFL is important. The proposed stadium deal is bad. That's why most people oppose it. There's no "return on investment" for taxpayers...
 
Last edited:
The offer to put up a new stadium with taxpayer's money should be like this.
If the owner sells the team within a 20 year window, they have to pay a portion of the original amount the taxpayers put up for the stadium.
for example.
Sells withing the first year, they pay back 100% of the money.
5 years, they pay back 75%, 7 years they payback 65% and so on.
Also, any money earned on the 'naming' of the stadium, goes back into repaying.

Just so sick and tired of this Corporatism, where the public takes the risk, by putting up the money, and the corps and billionares take all the profit.
 
Unfortunately, I'm not surprised at the amount of uniformed opinion on this discussion - including in the original letter to the editor that sparked this whole controversy.

Yes, there are plenty of downstate people who oppose the "giveaway." It's funny, they didn't oppose contributing to baseball stadiums in NYC for the Yankees and Mets or arenas in NYC and Long Island.

It is a public/private partnership that does have language that commits the team to WNY for the next 30 years or there will be payback to the state. It also gives the STATE considerably more control over the stadium and significantly reduces the burden on Erie County taxpayers.

The fact that the teams does attract significant money from fans outside of Erie County - and even outside of the country - should be seen as a PLUS. That money wouldn't come here without the team.

NY collects significant payroll taxes from members of the team that they wouldn't get if the team wasn't here.

NY, Erie County, and localities around WNY collect significant sales tax revenue from events at the stadium. Without the stadium, there would be NO events of that scale. They'd simply skip Buffalo.

Many medium-sized cities - like Grand Rapids - have other teams within reasonable travel distance (like Chicago). Here, fans would have to choose between Cleveland or Pittsburgh since they're much closer than the Jets or Giants. It's more likely they'd choose "none of the above." Grand Rapids is also within easy travel distance of major college football programs with stadia that dwarf the existing stadium and proposed stadium in Orchard Park. The NCAA is going to have to face sharing their considerable revenue with players as they move forward, perhaps not as much as the NFL does, but it is facing a seismic shift in operations as they try to create a "new normal." Buffalo has no program that approaches the BIG college sports conferences.

What's harder to calculate is the amount of positive press that the Bills bring to WNY. When the team is good, as it has become over the last few years, it brings a lot of positive awareness to the area and improves the quality of life here. It's one more attraction that makes us a "major league city" as we try to stem the flood of people to warmer climes where they're experiencing increasing problems with weather, lack of water, and increased expenses from climate change. Over the next 30 years, the value of being located on the Great Lakes is going to improve our standing because we have access to transportation and resources that are already in demand elsewhere. We're going to need to have more influence in the wise use of those resources, and the Bills increase our visibility in the national discussion.

If you actually read the agreement for the stadium construction, you'll find it's NOT just a "giveaway." It's much more complex than that, and the state expects to reap enough revenue to repay the cost of construction.

You need to stop consuming political soundbites as if they're "fact" and look more deeply into facts. We have a gubernatorial election coming up and there's already a significant amount of misinformation and outright disinformation on the airwaves regarding the role of the current governor in the negotiations. We're even hearing from the recently deposed megalomaniac that the deal that was struck "wasn't what he would have negotiated" although his negotiating team was in the thick of the discussions and he promised that they were "close." I doubt that it is dramatically different, but he wouldn't lie to us, would he?

This is a political football that's going to get kicked around for the months, if not years. Personally, I'd rather have the money spent on a new stadium than a boondoggle like the Riverbend Tesla plant. It's definitely going to be of greater economic benefit to NY and WNY than that giveaway.
 
Well, if I did one thing with my post, it got tbolt909 and Buddy Shula to agree on something. DavidEduardo, I respect each and every point you made. All valid. But you’re an outsider! You’re looking at it objectively. I’ve lived here all my life. I’ve been listening to Bills games since I first tuned into the legendary Van Miller for the AFL Championship game in 1964. Buffalo is not San Diego. The Bills are truly embedded in our community to the point it’s unhealthy (re: smashing tables). I KNOW how important they are and how emotionally we’re attached to this team. So do a few other natives who post on this board. The Bills playing deep into January this past season took the sting out of one of the worst months of the year in Buffalo. Losing the Bills would be a huge blow to our community’s collective psyche. Of course, Buffalo would survive it. But there would be an everlasting hole in our hearts on Sunday afternoons. Buddy makes that very point in his argument that Buffalo business grounds to a halt when the Bills are playing. If the Bills weren’t important, that wouldn’t happen. Again, I happen to disagree. Bars and restaurants thrive on Bills game day. The retail sector might suffer a bit with lower customer traffic. But supermarkets are packed the morning of and the day before Bills games.

I’ll admit being perplexed by the poll that shows even Western New Yorkers oppose the stadium deal. I attribute that to people being naive or ill-informed about the realities of the NFL. Sure, we all wish the Pegulas would have ponied up all the money to build the new stadium. We all know they could afford it. But the owners hold all the cards, especially in small markets like Buffalo. Yeah, it sucks. Taxpayers are footing 2/3rds of the cost of the new stadium, allowing billionaires to make even more money. But does our community want an NFL franchise or not? Despite what’s being said in this thread, I know the answer is yes!

Now, to bring this discussion to what this board is all about — radio — I’ll conclude with this. WGR is a top five radio station in our market because of the Buffalo Bills. Sure, the Sabres contribute somewhat to the station’s overall numbers. But WGR would lose much of its audience if the Bills leave. During the team’s playoff drought, WGR would see its strong fall numbers drop into the 2 to 3 share range in spring and early summer. Why? The Bills were losing, and people just lost interest in talking about the Bills during the offseason. This year, at least through the recently released March numbers, WGR is maintaining its audience. Because the Bills are playing great. Listeners see the Super Bowl possibilities. They want to talk about it.

And that’s why I was astounded by Buddy’s letter to the editor. Big WECK is all about Buffalo. Heritage personalities and all that. Buddy is entitled to his opinion that the stadium deal is bad. But make no mistake here. No publicly-funded stadium deal? No Buffalo Bills! Bye bye! They’re heading to Toronto, Austin, Orlando or a host of other cities that would welcome the Bills with open arms. Do most WECK listeners want that?
 
The taxpayers don't own the team. So the taxpayers don't get a share of the team's profit.

This deal is for the stadium, not the team. The stadium can be used for other things, and those other things might lead to a profit.

But government is not intended to be a profit-making enterprise, so there will be no profits. The revenues will be plowed back into operations of the stadium.


Here's how the governor explained how it will make back its money:



This deal is being described as a public-private partnership, which is exactly how the FCC views its relationship with radio station owners. The public owns the spectrum, the private companies own the license to operate the facility. Using your logic, the taxpayers should get a share of Radio One's profits. But the taxpayers don't own your station, just as the taxpayers don't own the Buffalo Bills. That's why taxpayers are not entitled to profits from the team. These kinds of things are popular around the country, and in New York State:


But sure, if it makes you feel better, you should campaign against the Erie county politicians who voted for this money. Make it an election issue. See who wins. Will you accept the decision of the people?
Ok. It’s semantics.
Well, if I did one thing with my post, it got tbolt909 and Buddy Shula to agree on something. DavidEduardo, I respect each and every point you made. All valid. But you’re an outsider! You’re looking at it objectively. I’ve lived here all my life. I’ve been listening to Bills games since I first tuned into the legendary Van Miller for the AFL Championship game in 1964. Buffalo is not San Diego. The Bills are truly embedded in our community to the point it’s unhealthy (re: smashing tables). I KNOW how important they are and how emotionally we’re attached to this team. So do a few other natives who post on this board. The Bills playing deep into January this past season took the sting out of one of the worst months of the year in Buffalo. Losing the Bills would be a huge blow to our community’s collective psyche. Of course, Buffalo would survive it. But there would be an everlasting hole in our hearts on Sunday afternoons. Buddy makes that very point in his argument that Buffalo business grounds to a halt when the Bills are playing. If the Bills weren’t important, that wouldn’t happen. Again, I happen to disagree. Bars and restaurants thrive on Bills game day. The retail sector might suffer a bit with lower customer traffic. But supermarkets are packed the morning of and the day before Bills games.

I’ll admit being perplexed by the poll that shows even Western New Yorkers oppose the stadium deal. I attribute that to people being naive or ill-informed about the realities of the NFL. Sure, we all wish the Pegulas would have ponied up all the money to build the new stadium. We all know they could afford it. But the owners hold all the cards, especially in small markets like Buffalo. Yeah, it sucks. Taxpayers are footing 2/3rds of the cost of the new stadium, allowing billionaires to make even more money. But does our community want an NFL franchise or not? Despite what’s being said in this thread, I know the answer is yes!

Now, to bring this discussion to what this board is all about — radio — I’ll conclude with this. WGR is a top five radio station in our market because of the Buffalo Bills. Sure, the Sabres contribute somewhat to the station’s overall numbers. But WGR would lose much of its audience if the Bills leave. During the team’s playoff drought, WGR would see its strong fall numbers drop into the 2 to 3 share range in spring and early summer. Why? The Bills were losing, and people just lost interest in talking about the Bills during the offseason. This year, at least through the recently released March numbers, WGR is maintaining its audience. Because the Bills are playing great. Listeners see the Super Bowl possibilities. They want to talk about it.

And that’s why I was astounded by Buddy’s letter to the editor. Big WECK is all about Buffalo. Heritage personalities and all that. Buddy is entitled to his opinion that the stadium deal is bad. But make no mistake here. No publicly-funded stadium deal? No Buffalo Bills! Bye bye! They’re heading to Toronto, Austin, Orlando or a host of other cities that would welcome the Bills with open arms. Do most WECK listeners want that?
Big WECK is all about Buffalo, not just the Buffalo Bills.

It’s unbelievable to me that this city thinks the Bills are the only thing good about Buffalo, even when they are bad. I realize we are not paying for the team, we are paying for the stadium….in an indirect way, we are paying for the team. Like extortion.

Then, as a cherry on top, they leave the stadium without a roof! Obviously they are not thinking of anything but football with this stadium, knowing you can’t have rock concerts outside when it’s 4 degrees with 12 feet of snow!

I think there is a misconception that I do not like the Bills. I do! I am consumed by football on Sundays. But the economics are different. We pay way too much in taxes in this area now. We are shutting down hospitals because of funding. Now, taxpayers, without our consent have to pay for a stadium with limited use so that the billionaire owner can let his team play there? I have no idea what you think is right about this.

The fact that we are being talked about on Sundays? We’ve been talked about on Sundays for decades and how has that affected our population? It’s going down the shitter!

Taxes are great when they go to the right causes and people, but for a stadium so that a billionaire can put a team of millionaires on the field is not right or fair.

I go to Bills games. We get a lot of pub nationwide from them. People peeing off rafters, jumping thru tables, having sex in the open, puking in parking lots, fighting in stands….it’s like a third world country.

My biggest problem is taxpayers to a large extent are funding this stadium without a say, because if we had a say, there would be no new stadium.

If we have to pay taxes, like everything else public, we should be able to use it however we want, and we should get a dividend on stadium profits.
 
Well, if I did one thing with my post, it got tbolt909 and Buddy Shula to agree on something. DavidEduardo, I respect each and every point you made. All valid. But you’re an outsider! You’re looking at it objectively. I’ve lived here all my life. I’ve been listening to Bills games since I first tuned into the legendary Van Miller for the AFL Championship game in 1964. Buffalo is not San Diego. The Bills are truly embedded in our community to the point it’s unhealthy (re: smashing tables). I KNOW how important they are and how emotionally we’re attached to this team. So do a few other natives who post on this board. The Bills playing deep into January this past season took the sting out of one of the worst months of the year in Buffalo. Losing the Bills would be a huge blow to our community’s collective psyche. Of course, Buffalo would survive it. But there would be an everlasting hole in our hearts on Sunday afternoons. Buddy makes that very point in his argument that Buffalo business grounds to a halt when the Bills are playing. If the Bills weren’t important, that wouldn’t happen. Again, I happen to disagree. Bars and restaurants thrive on Bills game day. The retail sector might suffer a bit with lower customer traffic. But supermarkets are packed the morning of and the day before Bills games.

I’ll admit being perplexed by the poll that shows even Western New Yorkers oppose the stadium deal. I attribute that to people being naive or ill-informed about the realities of the NFL. Sure, we all wish the Pegulas would have ponied up all the money to build the new stadium. We all know they could afford it. But the owners hold all the cards, especially in small markets like Buffalo. Yeah, it sucks. Taxpayers are footing 2/3rds of the cost of the new stadium, allowing billionaires to make even more money. But does our community want an NFL franchise or not? Despite what’s being said in this thread, I know the answer is yes!

Now, to bring this discussion to what this board is all about — radio — I’ll conclude with this. WGR is a top five radio station in our market because of the Buffalo Bills. Sure, the Sabres contribute somewhat to the station’s overall numbers. But WGR would lose much of its audience if the Bills leave. During the team’s playoff drought, WGR would see its strong fall numbers drop into the 2 to 3 share range in spring and early summer. Why? The Bills were losing, and people just lost interest in talking about the Bills during the offseason. This year, at least through the recently released March numbers, WGR is maintaining its audience. Because the Bills are playing great. Listeners see the Super Bowl possibilities. They want to talk about it.

And that’s why I was astounded by Buddy’s letter to the editor. Big WECK is all about Buffalo. Heritage personalities and all that. Buddy is entitled to his opinion that the stadium deal is bad. But make no mistake here. No publicly-funded stadium deal? No Buffalo Bills! Bye bye! They’re heading to Toronto, Austin, Orlando or a host of other cities that would welcome the Bills with open arms. Do most WECK listeners want that?
Most WECK listeners are 68 years old. I think they would understand that taxes are bad enough
 
I’m not in Buffalo so I’ll avoid wallowing in this debate, but the excellent Field of Schemes website is a good resource for news and debate about stadium and arena construction shenanigans across the country: https://www.fieldofschemes.com/
That's why people in San Diego said no thanks. It's kind of sad seeing middle aged men being fanatical about an NFL team. The emotional attachment that Bills fans have is unrequited. The out of town owner is laughing so hard he wet his pants...
 
The offer to put up a new stadium with taxpayer's money should be like this.
If the owner sells the team within a 20 year window, they have to pay a portion of the original amount the taxpayers put up for the stadium.

According to the Buffalo News, it's a 30 year deal. If the team leaves, they have to pay the entire cost of the stadium:

Locking the Bills into Western New York was a top priority and an immutable instruction Hochul gave her staff.
“I said, ‘I want it ironclad that if we’re going to make this commitment, that they have to stay,’ ” said Hochul, who describes the 30-year lease as including a penalty that would require the team “to pay back the entire cost of the stadium” if it were to move.
 
This reminds me of years ago in New England - the Kraft family wanted a new stadium for the Patriots and wanted MA to pay for it. They were told no which I found shocking for a government to have a backbone but also found it pleasantly surprising (I had moved from WNY to MA not long before this happened and was used to WNY style govt). So the Patriots started talking about moving to Hartford CT and even picked a site - the state did not back down. In the end the Patriots bluff was called and they ended up ponying up the money to build a stadium next to the old one and what they did showed the genius of free enterprise. The stadium is an entire complex with shopping, restaurants, function room areas for small conferences and meetings (with views over the field to watch the team practice). It gets used year round (maybe not the stadium itself but all the ancillary parts of it). MA did end up putting in money but just for the highway changes needed for the new layout - a reasonable compromise and pretty much what you would expect the govt to do anyway.

Funding for sports stadiums for any sport should be banned nationwide. You have billionaires paying millionaires and taxpayers subsidizing all of it - crazy.

Would the Bills really leave if NY said no? Maybe/maybe not. They serve a large market area which overlaps into Canada which the NFL may not want to abandon. We will never know, though, because the govt. in WNY and NY would rather keep taxes high and then play king and decide which businesses they want to be there by subsidizing them rather than lower taxes and let the free market decide. WNY would not be in the situation it has been in for the last 50 years if taxes were lower and state/local regulations were reduced.
 
GOSH..... When I started this post, I had no idea it would be so controversial.
I was born, raised and educated in WNY. While I now live 2,300 miles away,
my heart and mind still have great attachments to the city and the region as well.
Weather aside, it was, is and likely always will be a great place to live. Whether
you agree or disagree with the stadium deal, the intangible is that there is a great
sense of PRIDE, COMMUNITY, etc, etc, etc in W.N.Y. that is sorely lacking elsewhere.
It brings a smile to my face to see businesses like WECK Radio, The Bills, Fowler's
chocolates, Perry's Ice Cream, THE BILLS and countless others do well...... You cannot put
a price tag on that!!!!!!!! Go Bills, Go WECK Radio, Go W.N.Y!!!!!!!!
Erie County is one of the few places in New York State actually gaining population.
That is per WGRZ Tv's recent 6 pm newscast which I watch frequently.....
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom