• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Are broadcast networks becoming obsolete 10-20 yrs from now?

A six year run for a comedy show is pretty common isn't it? Laugh-In, one of the most popular comic shows lasted only six IIRC and many celebrity based comedies lasted much less.
Today, less than half of the comedies make it through one season. And hlf again don’t go beyond two. So 75% are two seasons or less.
 
Last edited:
One kid at my school had money. His parents had one in the 70s.
You needed to have money to buy the early ones. The list price of the cheapest Sony Betamax when it was introduced in the U.S. in 1975 was $2,000. That's $11,000 adjusted for inflation. When RCA introduced the first VHS player in 1977, part of its appeal was that it only cost $1,000---but that's $5,500 in today's money.
 
No, it comes from the actual word "minnow," a small fish. I'm sure Mr. Minow suffered misspellings of his surname long before "Gilligan's Island" debuted.
I got one in 1979. It was "free" via a trade with the stations I was managing.
 
Uhhhhh......dude? You think no white people watched Oprah? Even Soul Train?
[/QUOTE

I'm pretty sure alot of white people watched black shows and black or Mexican etc. Watched white people shows. So I agree that white people watched shows like Oprah, Soul Train and Arsenio Hall. Then you have shows that are mixed like Different Strokes and Webster. People watch cause they like the show not the color of their skin.
 
Nextdoor has entertainment value.....I'm not sure about news value.
In my region it's actual news. The police issue statements on Nextdoor. I get reports of missing pets, crimes, various criminal trends to watch out for, fires, etc. on Nextdoor.

It may vary from region to region.

And I get virtually no local news otherwise. It's all Seattle-Tacoma news, state, or national on radio and other online news sources.
 
-----
boombox4 said:
You are forgetting the huge percentage of households where making the money last till the 30's of the month is a skill and a challenge. And we are seeing more and more people in that class, particularly with estimates that show over 20,000,000 undocumented immigrants, most with less than a 6th grade education... and over 2 million a year arriving now.

-------


That 20-million number (and I don't doubt someone is reporting it as news, and I doubt I'd be surprised by the source) is double the real number:


I'd need to see some verifiable facts on the two-million undocumented immigrants per year as well, given that the total number of immigrants (documented and undocumented) tends to be half that yearly.

And before someone says "politics", we're talking about factual and quality news reporting in this thread, so let's back up any claims.
Mr. Hagerty, that was Mr. Eduardo's statement about the 20 million, not my statement.

Mine was about the poverty level in general.

As for the number of illegals in the US, the DHS and Center for Immigration Studies estimate there are just over 11 million.



That said, obviously, there are families whose children are legal, but the families themselves may still be in poverty. And 11.34 million people is more than the population of many states. So it's a considerable number of people in financial stress.
 
Mr. Hagerty, that was Mr. Eduardo's statement about the 20 million, not my statement.
And we have had over 2,000,000 "registered" and another 2,000,000 to 3,000,000 who were not stopped and processed in just the last 20 months. The estimates towards the end of 2000 were somewhere between 12 million and 14 million.
Mine was about the poverty level in general.
And because inflation has affected basic needs like food and gasoliine and electricity, the effects on the lowest income people is the greatest. The definition of the needs that determine poverty have not been redefined for decades.
As for the number of illegals in the US, the DHS and Center for Immigration Studies estimate there are just over 11 million.
The DHS is failing to take into account the crisis at the border with Mexico and has not adjusted the figure for over a decade. The Pew Center is even low, as there is no way of keeping up with the flood of migrants crossing the southern border.
That said, obviously, there are families whose children are legal, but the families themselves may still be in poverty. And 11.34 million people is more than the population of many states. So it's a considerable number of people in financial stress.
And there is a gray area of illegal immigrants who have children who are automatically US citizens.

An example: There are now ads in the papers and online in Perú about helping process papers for pregnant women to travel to the US and get citizenship for their child. The participants are upper middle class and upper income who qualify for tourist visas and need help finding a residence and hospital servicias to give birth in the US. The political and economic situation there is so dire that there are tens of thousand of families buying homes in the West Palm Beach and Treasure Coast areas of Florida to get out "before it all falls apart".
 
What hastened the demise of traditional local print/online journalism more than anything is the death of classified advertising. That was a gold mine for newspapers that dried up in a heartbeat when Craigslist and other forms of free online classifieds came along in 1995. A 2015 study estimated local newspapers lost $5 billion in revenue from 2000 to 2007 alone.

And that kicked off an endless spiral---the loss of the revenue forced cuts, readers found less to like, subscriptions declined, taking commercial advertising rates with them, forcing more cuts, readers finding less to like and an increasing number of places to find information if not quite news, subscriptions declining some more, taking commercial advertising rates with them...

It's grim.
All very true. As soon as CL heated up, newspapers lost 40% of their revenues.

But at the same time, the internet became the go-to for news, instead of the local paper. So the papers were slammed from more than one direction. And papers were already starting to decline before CL finished them off. Nationwide, daily newspaper circulation began to decline after 1984, and the decline is a fairly steady curve downwards.

When it comes to revenues, there were two peaks, in 2000 and 2005, after which it dived -- cut in half between 2006 and 2009.


I'm surprised that there still is a print edition of Seattle Times. I'll miss it when it disappears. You get that way when you grew up with a medium and worked in it.
 
Today, less than half of the comedies make it through one season. And hlf again don’t go beyond two. So 75% are two seasons or less.
I was thinking of 60's and 70's comedies primarily. We've sure had a bunch of stinkers in recent years.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom