Correct, such as Alternative WERS.
plus WMBR and WZBC, which have decent signals.
Correct, such as Alternative WERS.
I feel bad for the legacy Westinghouse/CBS properties that Entercom/Audacy acquired.... the way AUD is going ...
I feel bad for the legacy Westinghouse/CBS properties that Entercom/Audacy acquired.
Well, let's see; which other legacy Westinghouse/CBS stations does Audacy control now?Which ones are left? They spun off WBZ-AM/FM, and sold WAAF. WEEI isn't a legacy station. It was originally WHDH.
Mix is no longer the heritage WBCN. Not much real legacy left.
My point is I was not concerned solely, if at all, for Audacy's Boston properties.
Looking back now some five years ago this coming week, still can't understand why Entercom retained the Boston properties that ultimately make up their cluster today.The fact is that CBS was going to get out of radio, as NBC and ABC did earlier. So who would you have preferred to buy CBS radio?
Looking back now some five years ago this coming week, still can't understand why Entercom retained the Boston properties that ultimately make up their cluster today.
While staying under the cap....they DID have the choice of WHICH of the two sports stations they held onto, and which they spun off.
Their choice was to keep WEEI, and spin off The Sports Hub.
They were loyal to their people, even though it cost them money.
I think the FCC limit is five FM stations in a market (I'm SURE I'm using the word "market" wrong here!).Could Entercom remained under the cap if they had done the opposite, e,g., kept WBZ-AM, WBZ-FM, WKAF, WZLX, and WRKO? Is there any way they the could have held on to either WBMX or WODS, or both, also while remaining under the cap?
And they were restricted from having nearly 100% of the subset of sports revenue and audience.they retained the maximum amount of stations without going over the percent of market ad sales revenue number (40%) they had to stay under at the time of the transactions