• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

WABC-Building a Brand

That would be the perfect opportunity to move WQXR back to a full power signal. 99.5 is a great frequency as you have 99.1 and 99.9 in Connecticut so that reduces the chance of first adjacent channel interference in its coverage area.
New York Public Radio has a lot of financial issues right now and a lot of strained employee relations. They are not going to waste their time and money on litigation over an attempted purchase of 99.5 even if the opportunity presented itself. And it won’t present itself at all.
 
In an interview with InsideRadio, WABC owner John Catsimatidis and Pres. Chad Lopez disclosed that the station gave up 2.7 million dollars annual revenue when they stopped leasing programming over the weekend. Cats said, "“We got rid of all the lawyers, accountants, financial advisors… all the con artists,”
The article mentioned that improving the product and increasing the size of the audience is the current priority, rather than maximizing revenue. The owner said that "The money will follow."
From InsideRadio
 
I commend John Catsimatidis and Chad Lopez for putting their listeners first. Hopefully, their sales dept. will take advantage of their growing audience and find ways to attract sponsors eager to reach this older, and still lucrative group. That's their challenge.
 
In an interview with InsideRadio, WABC owner John Catsimatidis and Pres. Chad Lopez disclosed that the station gave up 2.7 million dollars annual revenue when they stopped leasing programming over the weekend. Cats said, "“We got rid of all the lawyers, accountants, financial advisors… all the con artists,”
The article mentioned that improving the product and increasing the size of the audience is the current priority, rather than maximizing revenue. The owner said that "The money will follow."
From InsideRadio
Shouldn’t they have vetted the paid programming when John bought the station? And if I were one of the people who had paid John/WABC money to air my show, I wouldn’t take kindly to being called a con artist, when they were more than happy to take my money.
 
His order to every host on the station is, “You better tell the truth.” He tells Farber that he once fired a guy because he didn’t follow that mandate. “He twisted around the truth, and I don’t go for that crap.”
Firing someone because they didn’t want to speak the company line and shared narrative is a rather excellent recipe to make a station sound painfully boring, monotonous and repetitive to anyone under the age of 65. But he’s got all that Gristedes revenue lying around that is better off being incinerated, I guess.

The fact that WABC is blatantly airing nothing but hosts engage in endless groupthink is all that is wrong about the talk radio format and why the format (and honestly, the station itself) needs to be put out to pasture.
 
Last edited:
Firing someone because they didn’t want to speak the company line and shared narrative is a rather excellent recipe to make a station sound painfully boring, monotonous and repetitive to anyone under the age of 65. But he’s got all that Gristedes revenue lying around that is better off being incinerated, I guess.

The fact that WABC is blatantly airing nothing but hosts engage in endless groupthink is all that is wrong about the talk radio format and why the format (and honestly, the station itself) needs to be put out to pasture.
Didn't this station air Rudy Guliani?
 
Last edited:
That would seem to put a lie to "only tell the truth".
Regardless of how Cats’s “I fired someone for not speaking the truth” is interpreted, it shows that he should not be entrusted with running a high-powered AM station in market #1.

His idea of “the truth” could be rooted in actual truth, or it could be like the conspiracy theory whackos that bought time on the long-dead WALE in Providence RI in the early 2000s. Doesn’t matter. Firing someone for disagreeing with you is deeply noxious and toxic behavior.

If that’s the “brand” he wants to build with WABC, then count me out.
 
Shouldn’t they have vetted the paid programming when John bought the station? And if I were one of the people who had paid John/WABC money to air my show, I wouldn’t take kindly to being called a con artist, when they were more than happy to take my money.
The "con artists" were a feature of Cumulus. Mr. Catsimidatis dumped them essentially as soon as he took over.
 
The "con artists" were a feature of Cumulus. Mr. Catsimidatis dumped them essentially as soon as he took over.
That’s the thing, Cumulus couldn’t run the station as a loss leader like Cats can. Even when Disney owned the station WABC was running wall-to-wall infomercials on weekend overnights.

It’s also hilarious as The Cats Roundtable originated as a brokered program.
 
If WABC earned 2.7 million dollars from its former weekend brokered programming, that can be an indication stations running leased programming throughout the week, such as WPAT AM and WVIP FM, can be very profitable, despite low ratings.
 
If WABC earned 2.7 million dollars from its former weekend brokered programming, that can be an indication stations running leased programming throughout the week, such as WPAT AM and WVIP FM, can be very profitable, despite low ratings.

Typically the money is based on the reach. I don't think the signal of WPAT-AM compares to that of WABC.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom