• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Is AM Already Doomed? Or Can It Be Saved?

All the ones I know stream their music to a bluetooth speaker. I never see a radio in the wild anymore.

If you're listening to radio over your Bluetooth speaker, it's still radio. I've mentioned several times on these boards that I have a rather nice home stereo that has been sitting in my basement disconnected for the last seven years, which was when I moved into my current house. The speakers are still in my garage. I don't, however, listen to my own playlists except for about two months out of the year when Christmas music is almost unavoidable on the radio. Simply put, radio isn't something I'm willing to work at to enjoy, and building my own playlists and/or adding variety to playlists on streaming services is work. The real question to radio's long-term viability is what the younger generation will be doing as it gets older. If today's 18 year olds are like the rest of us, they'll stop wanting to work at radio as a form of entertainment, too. Granted, our version of playlists took a little longer to compose and required more work since we didn't have digital downloads; we made mixtapes in junior high and high school. Very few of us were still using them by the time we graduated.

I know plenty of people who are technology challenged. My mother for one. I have to walk her through everything. I doubt those people are the minority.

My mother is 76 and as intimidated by technology as anyone. She's had an iPhone for over five years now and uses it admirably. She can't/doesn't do as much with it as my sister (age 40) and I (age 48), but she knows what's going on at her house whether she's home or not, what the news and weather for her area are, how to text and check her email, and even how to manager her bank account. I'd say she has a few more apps than the average of 25 that Michael quotes, but she doesn't likely have 40.

There is a reason people don't want to see AM die and it's because it's a comfort thing.

Most of us don't really care. While AM has a couple of sports stations I enjoy and I'll tune in KMOX once-in-awhile for news, it otherwise doesn't have much to offer. It's mostly programming to an older audience because people didn't want to waste their FM signals on programming to a demographic that advertisers generally don't want. Will I be a little disappointed if AM and FM radio go away? I suppose I will because of how easy it is to use in the car, but that's about the only place I use over-the-air radio these days. Most of my listening is already via streaming, and, if I can still get my favorite music and shows that way, I'm probably not going to sweat it.

The younger generations don't know any better so they embrace the new way of thinking.

Maybe the youngest generation doesn't know better, but those of us in our 40's who have lived without the internet are still using smart and connected devices for our entertainment. People want what's convenient. Radio used to be convenient because it was included with other items you bought. Most people bought no more than a couple radios. People used radio because it was on their clocks, flashlights, microwaves, etc. You don't see that so much anymore. Now, I can pull up my local radio station with an app on my phone. That's easier than adding a radio dongle to it (if you can even find one of those these days). Only headache is listening to sports.
 
While a translator will not replace WNAX or kFYR, it will be better than all but one or two of the AMs in Albuquerque.
Situations will vary. Most places don't have a Sandia Crest looming over them, providing the opportunity for full city coverage by an FM translator even at low power. And three of the Albuquerque AMs that had better coverage have downgraded significantly in recent years (920, 1150, 1310) in order to "diplex" on the KRZY (1450) tower. A good test of the current situation is coverage in Santa Fe. Really, the only two usable Albuquerque AM signals in Santa Fe any more are 610 and 770.

In Denver, translators have a tougher time, particularly with multipath near downtown.
 
Simply put, radio isn't something I'm willing to work at to enjoy, and building my own playlists and/or adding variety to playlists on streaming services is work.
Also, it costs money.

Though I have made lists of three groups of songs I would want to listen to on this site. These were not complete and I keep adding to them. I'm not sure how to show people the current lists, but I do know people found them interesting.
 
Though I have made lists of three groups of songs I would want to listen to on this site. These were not complete and I keep adding to them. I'm not sure how to show people the current lists, but I do know people found them interesting.
Are these people in the room with you right now?
 
The oldest GenXers will hit 55 in six years. The youngest ones in 13 years. So---yeah, if they're the ball game, but they're also the smallest generation born after 1945.

But after that come Millennials (now 27 to 42 years old). It's a huge demographic, so there's that, and a decent percentage of them are clearly listening to radio now, or 18-34 and 18-49 numbers would have cratered.

But past them, Gen Z, as I mentioned in another thread, is five years away from being the majority of the 18-34 demo. And that's where radio listening gets really dicey---far worse than Millennials.
You seem to be in cross purposes here: You said in a previous post that the youngest boomers aged out five years ago but the oldest Gen-Xers will age out six years from now! Shouldn't the youngest and oldest of each group age out at the same time?
 
You seem to be in cross purposes here: You said in a previous post that the youngest boomers aged out five years ago but the oldest Gen-Xers will age out six years from now! Shouldn't the youngest and oldest of each group age out at the same time?
You missed this:

The oldest GenXers are turning 58 this year, having been born in 1965. The GenX cohort is already aging out of radio’s target demos.

Math is hard. You're right.
 
Believe it or not, dial up is still a thing (and it can still work to an extent on those newfangled fiber-based VoIP things they call landlines nowadays, though usually at slower speeds due to limited audio bandwidth resulting from the digital compression algorithms most telcos use). Emulators also exist that allow one to use older computers from the 80s and early 90s, which were usually designed first and foremost for networking over dial up.

Ethernet was a thing back then, but it was often very expensive, and before the 90s, commonly used coaxial cables that were very cumbersome and difficult to install, so outside of big organizations, most people never bothered with it. It wasn't until high speed home internet became relatively common and affordable in the very late 90s and 2000s that it was worth the effort for the average home computer user (and, of course, by then, the modern form of twisted-pair ethernet became the standard, so having a home ethernet-based network became quite easy). Unless you had a Mac, which could be networked with other Macs using LocalTalk, which was slower, but far simpler to implement because it used the comparatively simple RS-422 standard.

As you can probably guess, antique radios (and radio broadcast bands) aren't my only hobby ;)

c
 
Last edited:
Our friend Barry Mishkind "The Eclectic Engineer" has written a thoughtful piece about the future of AM radio at:


"The discussion about the fate of the AM band has reached many parts of the industry – and now into Congress as well. What are the key issues? Will the Bills now moving through Congress provide the right answers? Or, is AM doomed no matter what happens? Take a look and see how this may affect you – even if you are not an AM station. "

Note: No paywall! Explore Barry's site for more interesting content with a technical focus.
Noticed Barry uses old school ad banners. Noice.
 
Anyway, back to something resembling the original topic:

As for the viability of AM, I can't speak for the majority of other places, but it seems like here in the east SFBA, particularly in the hills where there's little to no cellular service (believe it or not, many such places still exist – Tilden Park in Oakland, for example) and FM reception is spotty and bad sounding. AM, for all its shortcomings, tends to perform far better than both FM and streaming, because you can't stream when there's no cellular service!

Also, despite the relative lack of programming, the SF AM dial is still fairly robust, with several locals KCBS, KSFO, and KNEW) and some good DX that comes in the evening and overnight (KFI, KNX and KABC, to name a few), not to mention the numerous ethnic (mostly Spanish, but also Indian and Chinese, among others) and all manor of religious stations, so AM is not dead here, yet.

I suppose SiriusXM is an alternative that would work, but not everyone wants to subscribe to it when AM/FM and most streaming stations are free (I certainly don't; I have enough trouble affording cellular service as it is).

c
 
Last edited:
Meanwhile, The Arizona Borad of Regents - University of Arizona, have applied to move 50 kw daytimer KUAZ 1550 to a new site SE of Tucson.
Put up 3 towers. Add night-time service of 425 watts directional upgrading KUAT from Class D to Class B.
Daytime 50 kw will be directional with the same pattern.

View attachment 5296
This is all about providing better coverage of Sierra Vista, which is the next largest city outside of the Tucson metro, and more importantly, add more members and $$$$. But couldn't they just find an open frequency down there for a translator, and save all that contributed money for something more worthwhile?
 
Arizona Public Media, i.e. the University of Arizona, already simulcasts KUAZ on KUAS (88.9) Sierra Vista. There is a translator of KUAZ as well on 91.3.

 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom