• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

House Seeks to Defund CPB

Here we go again! Every time repubs are in charge, they try to defund CPB or some part of public broadcasting:


The battle they'll have to fight will come from several red states that depend on federal funding for their state radio & TV networks. The blue states don't need the money. But West Virginia, South Carolina, and Mississippi do.
 
Here is a copy of the email I'm sending out to our elected officials using direct contact info provided to stations by our public radio consortium in the state, highly edited for my situation

Paul Walker
KSKO FM Mcgrath Alaska

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Paul B. Walker, Jr. <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 9:15 AM
Subject: CPB Funding Is Vital To Public Radio In Alaska!
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>



Senator Murkowski:

I am writing to ask you to safeguard funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) in the FY2024 Labor-HHS Appropriations bill. As it currently stands, the House version of the bill eliminates the two-year advance appropriation for CPB and funding for the interconnection system.

I am the program director for KSKO- FM, based in McGrath with FM repeaters in Nikolai, Anvik, Grayling, Shageluk, Holy Cross, Sleetmute & Crooked Creek. We serve about 1200 people spanning 150 miles

Many in our region are elders who don't own computers and smartphones, therefore they don't have internet access. That's due in part to the cost barrier in getting internet set up and keeping it.

Some have tv, which is either a satellite system that will have “local channels” from Fairbanks or Anchorage 250-300 miles away. Some villages might have a low powered tv broadcast signal but all that Carries is Fairbanks or Anchorage signals. Those tv stations nearly 300 miles report on nothing that really matters to residents in my listening area.

An elimination of federal funding would devastate the entire system but be especially devastating and potentially deadly to our station. We would be unable to provide ESSENTIAL services to our listening area including:

* River break up forecasts and flooding potential. When rivers begin to melt and start flowing again, we provide critical information to help residents prepare to save property and life. They won’t get this detail anywhere else.

*Critical weather information such as extreme heat or cold. Our staff knows how to interpret local weather patterns and what is tolerable weather to locals, so we know how and when to alert residents to potential uncomfortable/dangerous weather.

*reporting on wildfires. Wildfires can easily decimate our region in the summer. We regularly stay in contact with local officials and wildfire officials to report on the latest conditions when wildfires threaten our region. Officials provide us with wildfire forecast info and help us alert our audience to save property or life when it threatens a village.

*Subsistence fishing information. Our region survives on subsistence living, it is a means for families to provide food for much of the year. We provide info on when certain types of gear or fishing is allowed or isn’t allowed or when certain fish need to be released or can be kept.

*Covid 19/other major health concerns. During the pandemic, we brought our residents vital information including community town halls from local health officials providing vital information on how to stay safe and health

My job is to know and to understand our listeners wants, needs and desires while understanding nuances and the effects of native tradition in our communities.. something no one else but public radio can do. We have the time and it is part of the sole reason we exist, our mission is to serve these people as no other media can do it. We compile all of the information mentioned above and more then present it in a fashion and manner for everyone, getting all the info they need from one source, rather then TRYING to find it from multiple sources and very likely missing out on much needed critical information.

I was on the air at 1230am when water came up over the banks in one village and began to enter town. I was then on the air from 6am to 3pm on and off providing needed health and safety information. I have been on the air to announce when a person can't be located and needs to be found.

I recognize that budgeting can be challenging and there are alot of cuts to lots of funding. However, a complete elimination of CPB funding would absolutely threaten the survival of public media and would absolutely spell the end to the station I manage in McGrath Alaska, therefore endangering health and safety in the long run. I am asking you to please protect CPB funding in the Senate Appropriations Committed and work through out the rest of the funding process to maintain this funding, ensuring that these invaluable sources in Alaska are maintained. From the bottom of my heart, I thank you for your support of KSKO

If you or anyone would like to speak to me by phone, testify/speak to any committee or provide any additional information, I am more than glad to do that ANY TIME, day or night. PLEASE call my cell phone at 907-XXX-XXXX

Regards,
Paul Walker
KSKO-FM McGrath, Alaska
Program Director, Morning/Lunch Show Host, Assistant Engineer, Cleaning Assistant, Secretary, Assistant Promotions Person, snow Shoveler, Moose Shooer Awayer & Treato Giver To ALL The Village Doggos
 
Great letter. Federal money is even more important in Alaska given the cutbacks in state funding.

These politicians need to understand that you're not asking for 100% funding. Your station does outreach for local funding as well. Politicians think it's all one big handout, and it's not.

The other part of this is they would defund the interconnection system, which is the satellite that connects you to other programming around the state and country. So this would be a major problem for you and for the people in your state.
 
Great letter. Federal money is even more important in Alaska given the cutbacks in state funding.

These politicians need to understand that you're not asking for 100% funding. Your station does outreach for local funding as well. Politicians think it's all one big handout, and it's not.

The other part of this is they would defund the interconnection system, which is the satellite that connects you to other programming around the state and country. So this would be a major problem for you and for the people in your state.

Yup.. because we're out of the beam of some other services.... like i think.. NPR! Some stations like KUHB and KIYU get their NPR feed from another station like KMXT or KUAC because KUAC is on the satellite and is much easier to reach
 
Yeah exactly. Previous attempts at this have gone nowhere; in some cases, funding has increased, not decreased or eliminated.
 
This will go nowhere in the U.S. Senate.
Given the GOP’s razor-thin majority in the House, there’s a realistic possibility this proposal doesn’t even clear that chamber, let alone die in the senate.

If it’s attached to a spending bill (which might be the only possible path here) it’d be stripped out in any senate reconciliation.
 
Here we go again! Every time repubs are in charge, they try to defund CPB or some part of public broadcasting:


The battle they'll have to fight will come from several red states that depend on federal funding for their state radio & TV networks. The blue states don't need the money. But West Virginia, South Carolina, and Mississippi do.
We had this same issue with PBS Affiliate OETA Oklahoma over the funding of the states PBS affiliate. When we were digging the cause of this it's because for some reason they made claims about kids shows that is not even true on the affiliate. We tried digging for segments that aired on PBS News hour, Frontline and their local equivalents with stories that might offend certain politicians in the state with no direct link but a correlation to that.

 
Great letter. Federal money is even more important in Alaska given the cutbacks in state funding.

These politicians need to understand that you're not asking for 100% funding. Your station does outreach for local funding as well. Politicians think it's all one big handout, and it's not.

The other part of this is they would defund the interconnection system, which is the satellite that connects you to other programming around the state and country. So this would be a major problem for you and for the people in your state.

We generally bust our butts for the funding we get locally/regionally and state wide from orgs/biz groups.

The 2 day music festival were broadcasting live on the radio this weekend is one example
 
This will go nowhere in the U.S. Senate.
This is what I call "stunt legislation."

They know it's going to go nowhere, but they introduce the bill, bray about it for a bit, complain when it fails, and when it comes time to campaign they point to it as an accomplishment.

Bills to de-fund public media. Bills to ban flag-burning. Bills to make the Pledge of Allegiance mandatory. Any number of official declarations of a "day of prayer" or other "affirmation of American freedom/values."

They know it won't pass muster, but they do it so they can send out an email when they need to raise money/win the primary touting all the "things I've done to fight for my constituents."

Awhile back, I checked on the federal layout for public media. The numbers may have changed somewhat, but from my reading, the entire taxpayer "burden" for NPR, PBS, etc. came out to less than the cost to build (but not operate or maintain) a single F-35 fighter. And again, most of the money comes from donations.

This is just pandering.
 
This is what I call "stunt legislation."

They know it's going to go nowhere, but they introduce the bill, bray about it for a bit, complain when it fails, and when it comes time to campaign they point to it as an accomplishment.

Bills to de-fund public media. Bills to ban flag-burning. Bills to make the Pledge of Allegiance mandatory. Any number of official declarations of a "day of prayer" or other "affirmation of American freedom/values."

They know it won't pass muster, but they do it so they can send out an email when they need to raise money/win the primary touting all the "things I've done to fight for my constituents."

Awhile back, I checked on the federal layout for public media. The numbers may have changed somewhat, but from my reading, the entire taxpayer "burden" for NPR, PBS, etc. came out to less than the cost to build (but not operate or maintain) a single F-35 fighter. And again, most of the money comes from donations.

This is just pandering.

Probably true but when our station survives on CPB funding we dont take chance.. losing CPB funding would destroy KSKO
 
Here we go again! Every time repubs are in charge, they try to defund CPB or some part of public broadcasting:
The problem with taxpayer funding of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting is, from a taxpayer perspective, that Public Broadcasting System content and perspective seem to favor Liberal, Progressive, or Democratic views or perspective. It gives the appearance of propaganda funded by all Americans, and all Americans do not hold those views. This is why you are seeing pushback, and until CPB adopts a neutral perpective where all voices are heard, opposition to the misuse of taxpayer funds will continue.
 
The problem with taxpayer funding of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting is, from a taxpayer perspective, that Public Broadcasting System content and perspective seem to favor Liberal, Progressive, or Democratic views or perspective.

CPB primarily funds local stations. The stations buy the programming from various places, including PBS. The reason for CPB is mainly because they wanted an intermediary between the politicians and the broadcasters. The CEO of CPB is a Trump appointee. So are several board members. The financial distribution system they use now was created in 1983 during the Reagan administration. They didn't want the government giving out welfare to broadcasters. So the money they give is directly based on local money raised in the community.

A lot of the NPR and PBS stations are owned by state governments, and about half of those states are run by Republicans. If there was anything liberal, progressive, or democratic, I would expect those governors or legislatures would object. In recent memory, only one governor has. It was in Oklahoma. He vetoed a state appropriation to the PBS station. His veto was overruled by the Republican legislature.
 
The problem with taxpayer funding of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting is, from a taxpayer perspective, that Public Broadcasting System content and perspective seem to favor Liberal, Progressive, or Democratic views or perspective. It gives the appearance of propaganda funded by all Americans, and all Americans do not hold those views. This is why you are seeing pushback, and until CPB adopts a neutral perpective where all voices are heard, opposition to the misuse of taxpayer funds will continue.

If there was an NPR station that broadcast primarily republican trump stuff, theyd probably still get funding

NPR is devoted to truth, factual reporting.. which is different than CPB and its funding.
 
From the article in the OP:

There is also no funding for system interconnection and infrastructure for FY 2024, a cut of $60 million from current levels.

The system interconnection has no role in content. It is strictly a technical operation, and it is available for use by program producers and distributors regardless of politics.
 
If there was an NPR station that broadcast primarily republican trump stuff, theyd probably still get funding
But they don't. Which is the reason for the taxpayer pushback. Remember, if they offer something of value that appeals to Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians, and so forth, they will not be want for funding, because people will line up to make donations. If they don't, then they won't. This is the way broadcasting works.
 
But they don't. Which is the reason for the taxpayer pushback.

Give some examples of grant applications that were turned down by CPB.

Also I don't see this "taxpayer pushback" you're talking about. In the local states, the taxpayers are not protesting their local stations or demanding their governors cut funding. What this is is a handful of republicans on a committee who are objecting at an early stage in the appropriation process. This happens all the time. It happened when the republicans controlled all three parts of the process. Ultimately, when the entire congress voted, the appropriation passed. I'm expecting the same thing will happen this time. The republican governors who run the public broadcasting operations in red states depend on this money.
 


Back
Top Bottom