Don’t know about that but I beginning to believe they should’ve left the imports to the professionals at BBC America, PBS, A&E, etc.Who could have seen failure coming to the CW?
Don’t know about that but I beginning to believe they should’ve left the imports to the professionals at BBC America, PBS, A&E, etc.Who could have seen failure coming to the CW?
Or at least imported something good like those networks tend to do (everyone has their misfires of course…while the CW is becoming one perpetual misfire)Don’t know about that but I beginning to believe they should’ve left the imports to the professionals at BBC America, PBS, A&E, etc.
I mean that the name of the show stayed the same even after what it described. "Jeopardy" had a whole category of those.Except Jane wasn’t a 17-year-old with a Australian accent…
tvline.com
They’re hoping to continue their stories…Home Economics are over at ABC while new drama High Potential moved to Fall 2024.
![]()
‘Home Economics’ Canceled At ABC, ‘High Potential’ Moves To Fall 2024
ABC is making lineup changes now that the writers strike is over. 'Home Economics' has been canceled after three seasons as 'High Potential' moves to fall 2024.deadline.com
Just like “Kung Fu” and “ICarly?” These show runners chances of bringing their shows back is like hoping for the Milwaukee Brewers winning a World Series (unfortunately they got eliminated by the Arizona Diamondbacks in the 2023 wild card game).🤣🤣🤣They can try.
Right, but that isn’t “coming back.”Sometimes shows come back with the same title but then it's a completely difficult show. There was a show called The Goldbergs in the 1950's and The Goldbergs in 2010's same title 2 different shows.
Which is good that shoe ran its course plus some of the 1980 something references happend in the 1990s like were not supposed to realize that it happened in the 90's and not the 80's.Right, but that isn’t “coming back.”