Yeah, in one of the pages I didn't screenshot, the motion says "As the final step in exiting the Bally Sports Arizona RSN, the Debtors have concluded that the Coyotes Agreement is not necessary to the Debtors’ business and is unlikely to provide a net benefit to the Debtors or their estates."According to this article, Bally Sports Arizona is shutting down: Diamond Ditches the NHL's 'Coyotes,' Pulls Plug on Bally Sports Arizona
So who picks up the 'Yotes? Gray has enough on its plate with the Suns and Mercury, and the D'backs are up in the air after this season, unless they continue to let MLB produce their games. It comes down to Fox or Scripps. No way does Tegna get involved, being committed to NBC and with no second station.
The NHL season starts next week. The Coyotes have to find a new station quick or be relegated to oblivion. Out of sight, out of mind.
The Coyotes have been dancing on the edge of oblivion ever since they arrived in Arizona in 1996.😬😖The Coyotes have to find a new station quick or be relegated to oblivion.
Unfortunately, that is 100% correct, and the blame starts with Jerry Colangelo and his ego. He brought the then-Winnipeg Jets here, signed them to play at what was then America West Arena, but had a falling out with the owners. It's gone downhill ever since.The Coyotes have been dancing on the edge of oblivion ever since they arrived in Arizona in 1996.😬😖
KUTP is a good fit, especially after getting rid of popular syndicated reruns. But, does Fox want to invest in the station? Scripps would work too, but only if they could get the games aired on KPPX (I imagine they're fine with the syndicated reruns they have and even The CW on KASW).According to this article, Bally Sports Arizona is shutting down: Diamond Ditches the NHL's 'Coyotes,' Pulls Plug on Bally Sports Arizona
So who picks up the 'Yotes? Gray has enough on its plate with the Suns and Mercury, and the D'backs are up in the air after this season, unless they continue to let MLB produce their games. It comes down to Fox or Scripps. No way does Tegna get involved, being committed to NBC and with no second station.
The NHL season starts next week. The Coyotes have to find a new station quick or be relegated to oblivion. Out of sight, out of mind.
I think Scripps is most likely as they already have broadcast agreement with Coyotes owned AHL team Tucson RoadRunners on KWBA. Plus they have the recent broadcast agreement with the Vegas Golden Knights. In an interview with SBJ the other day NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman actually used the the Golden Knights as an example while talking about what would happen if Diamond defaults on payments. "A number of our clubs, particularly clubs where their contracts were expiring, have made alternate deals. So in the first instance, we're supporting the clubs. We have a backup plan, which will enable any club to distribute its games if it chooses to do it, by that way. But you're seeing a number of clubs, Vegas being good example, going 'back to the future,' which is what I call over-the-air. So in the first instance, it's up to the clubs to decide what they want to do in the local market. But we have backup resources so that nobody will get caught short."KUTP is a good fit, especially after getting rid of popular syndicated reruns. But, does Fox want to invest in the station? Scripps would work too, but only if they could get the games aired on KPPX (I imagine they're fine with the syndicated reruns they have and even The CW on KASW).
Wait: isn't there another station which has market wide cable/satellite and also OTA coverage, and is locally owned (so they have to jump through less corporate hoops than Fox/Scripps)?
Like I said, KASW probably would make more money with its syndicated rerun lineup than running Coyotes hockey. But, if Scripps has a clause with INYO (like a quasi-LMA) to pre-empt ION on KPPX for the Coyotes, it may be an option.I think Scripps is most likely as they already have broadcast agreement with Coyotes owned AHL team Tucson RoadRunners on KWBA. Plus they have the recent broadcast agreement with the Vegas Golden Knights. In an interview with SBJ the other day NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman actually used the the Golden Knights as an example while talking about what would happen if Diamond defaults on payments. "A number of our clubs, particularly clubs where their contracts were expiring, have made alternate deals. So in the first instance, we're supporting the clubs. We have a backup plan, which will enable any club to distribute its games if it chooses to do it, by that way. But you're seeing a number of clubs, Vegas being good example, going 'back to the future,' which is what I call over-the-air. So in the first instance, it's up to the clubs to decide what they want to do in the local market. But we have backup resources so that nobody will get caught short."
![]()
SBJ Unpacks: Gary Bettman sounds off ahead of NHL season
www.sportsbusinessjournal.com
Disagree. Hockey, and most fast moving "ball" sports are definitely better in HD (as is virtually everything else except your local news anchor's face) but hockey has been watched by many people for many years without it. Newbie viewers might have an issue due to their relative inability to predict where the puck is going next but veteran watchers shouldn't have a problem.Now, on to the whole HD question. Hockey is unwatchable on TV without it.
Still on Cox channel 34 airing boxing as I write this.Per the last sentence of the linked article, Bally Sports Arizona is no more. Diamond Sports shut it down yesterday (Can anyone verify? I can't).
![]()
Diamond drops the NHL's Coyotes and pulls the plug on Bally Sports Arizona - Trend Trackers
As expected, bankrupt regional sports network operator Diamond Sports Group is exiting the NHL's Arizona Coyotes and shutting down another network, Ballytrendtrackers.biz.id
It will be there until Brad Cesmat's time buy runs out!Still on Cox channel 34 airing boxing as I write this.
Three words: Glowing blue puck. That was a laughingstock when Fox tried it in the late '90s. Hockey is far better on HD, no matter how many years one has been watching it on TV.Disagree. Hockey, and most fast moving "ball" sports are definitely better in HD (as is virtually everything else except your local news anchor's face) but hockey has been watched by many people for many years without it. Newbie viewers might have an issue due to their relative inability to predict where the puck is going next but veteran watchers shouldn't have a problem.
I remember Peter Puck on NBC back in the 70's as well.Three words: Glowing blue puck. That was a laughingstock when Fox tried it in the late '90s. Hockey is far better on HD, no matter how many years one has been watching it on TV.