I don't think in the history of radio did any average listener admire jocks talking up to the vocals or the post. In research back in the day, they either found it annoying, or sort of like spots, one just lives with it.
Either way, it was never seen as a positive.
I can still hear the evening jock in my mind at the Top 40 station I first worked at. This happened repeatedly most every night:I don't think in the history of radio did any average listener admire jocks talking up to the vocals or the post. In research back in the day, they either found it annoying, or sort of like spots, one just lives with it.
Either way, it was never seen as a positive.
As I recall the programming folks thinking in the day was to allow for more 'non-stop music', so jocks were encouraged to sweep music and other than stopping-down for breaks, just deliver liners, title/artist, banter, weather, time, and an occasional caller over longer intros. That's why guys like Don used to yell (project) so fast, to cram as much personality into :14 as possible without stomping the vocal.Yeah, it was a radio geek thing.
Which, ironically, KFRC, the last station Garland programmed, used—-so it could insert Dave Sholin doing the exact same rap, but faster, so he could say “610 KFRC” in it twice.And "We Built This City" had a version without Les Garland talking in the middle of it:
Frankly, I found the DJs who did that to be annoying even as a teenager back in the late seventies. That was one of the things that drove me over to FM as soon as pop music started appearing on the FM dial in the Seattle/Tacoma market.....but seriously, folks.
Hitting all the posts was great when the format was high energy and the audience was caffeinated teenagers.
It's not that anymore. Hasn't been for a long time.
Completely agree w/ you !I don't think in the history of radio did any average listener admire jocks talking up to the vocals or the post. In research back in the day, they either found it annoying, or sort of like spots, one just lives with it.
Either way, it was never seen as a positive.
That reminds me of a time I was at the same lunch table as Randy Michaels at one of those Dan O’Day seminars. Somehow we got into a battle of “give the call letters and name the city and frequency” where. Others at the table would give the calls. This went on for about 20 minutes between the two of us. Totally useless information, of course.People used to test me all the time by calling out a song, expecting the intro time, total length, and type of ending. I would also deliver the cart number at the time, recognizing there's no way to verify that. But in my mind, I can still see the cart and what position in the cart rack it was. Talk about a useless gift!
Yeah, I probably could have kept up with you for at least ten minutes of that. Stuff gets burned into the brain.That reminds me of a time I was at the same lunch table as Randy Michaels at one of those Dan O’Day seminars. Somehow we got into a battle of “give the call letters and name the city and frequency” where. Others at the table would give the calls. This went on for about 20 minutes between the two of us. Totally useless information, of course.
Except, except, when the next record had a cold open, no instrumental intro. Then the jock would say something over the outro of the previous song, followed by a tight segue into the jingle and the cold open of the next song. (Not the perfect example, but Simon & Garfunkel's At The Zoo. Their vocal hits in that first second.)I will say this----our memories are often flawed.
[...]
The Drake format forbade talking over the end of a record unless you were going into a commercial break---otherwise it was forward momentum---you're focused on what's next, not what was.
It wasn't that loose. What it was was they could hear the ambiance of the last notes fading away in the studio monitors or their headphones, and they wouldn't crack their mics and start speaking until that last sound had evaporated. *Most* listeners weren't listening on good enough equipment to hear what they were hearing in the studio, or were listening in cars where the road noise wiped out most of that fade. But if you were listening in a quiet environment with quality audio equipment, then you probably understood why they held back.And while I've heard jocks roll a record while they were finishing a commercial, that, too, was not happening on KHJ or any Drake station. A live read at the end of a stop set was required to have a jingle between it and the beginning of music.
And the FM album jocks---I mean, they'd let the last sound come off the vinyl before they'd crack the mic, and it was loose, but I haven't heard five seconds of dead air, much less ten. The technique, though, was very much the same as Classical and for that matter, Beautiful Music, where a second and a half to two seconds of dead air between elements was actually part of the format).
Except, except, when the next record had a cold open, no instrumental intro. Then the jock would say something over the outro of the previous song, followed by a tight segue into the jingle and the cold open of the next song. (Not the perfect example, but Simon & Garfunkel's At The Zoo. Their vocal hits in that first second.)
I know you have done a lot of research into KHJ, especially (but not limited to) the years 1965-1970. From your collection of unscoped airchecks, do you hear a lot of talking over the end of records while going into a commercial break where the copy was read live? That practice was permitted. I recall (though I may be mistaken), that it happened frequently.Because Drake stations billed themselves as "more music", they had to squeeze in as many records as they could, I think.I will say this----our memories are often flawed.
Since the beginning of the pandemic, I've been gradually listening to my entire unscoped aircheck collection chronologically, to get a sense of the evolution of California radio.
The Drake format forbade talking over the end of a record unless you were going into a commercial break---otherwise it was forward momentum---you're focused on what's next, not what was. And while I've heard jocks roll a record while they were finishing a commercial, that, too, was not happening on KHJ or any Drake station. A live read at the end of a stop set was required to have a jingle between it and the beginning of music.
And the FM album jocks---I mean, they'd let the last sound come off the vinyl before they'd crack the mic, and it was loose, but I haven't heard five seconds of dead air, much less ten. The technique, though, was very much the same as Classical and for that matter, Beautiful Music, where a second and a half to two seconds of dead air between elements was actually part of the format).
Maybe the difference was in the KHJ verses WOR-FM approaches. WOR-FM was what I had access to 24-7 in the NYC area. (Occasionally CKLW via tropospheric skip, or WRKO when I was in Boston on business, but 99% of the time it was OR-FM.) I recall it happening more often than you do.Not usually. I'd have said that, too---but in what I've heard listening back, it was a no-talk jingle segue---previous record's fade hits 40% or so, the jingle plays, the next record with a cold open starts. If there's a tempo change, a fast to slow or slow to fast jingle aids the transition.
I know you have done a lot of research into KHJ, especially (but not limited to) the years 1965-1970. From your collection of unscoped airchecks, do you hear a lot of talking over the end of records while going into a commercial break where the copy was read live? That practice was permitted.
Yes ! I should have written:Yes, which I said in the post you responded to:
The Drake format forbade talking over the end of a record unless you were going into a commercial break---
And that was regardless of whether the first element in the break was live copy or not. Record fades to 40 percent modulation, back-announce begins and into the break.
The exception was records with cold endings, in which case the back-announce happened in the clear on the way to the break.