D
Deleted member 108832
Guest
The problem there, of course, is that the service area of this thing is less than that of some LPFMs. It barely, and I mean barely, covers Oakwood and that isn't saying much. Unless there's someone out there who just has an ax to grind with Witkovski himself, no one in their right mind is going to sit there and collect enough evidence of the facility's silence to get the Commission involved. There's maybe 400 folks in Oakwood and, rest assured, there isn't a single one that will take the time, trouble, and effort to go through the procedure. The little town is doing good just to keep the lights on and conducting what little business it has. It's a couple hundred farmers and ranchers who only know enough about radio to turn it on and find the station playing country music.
@lanceventa is right on the money. The STA was filed just after the call sign exchange request, likely due to the perceived notion that EMF might come sniffing around after trying to pick up the calls. Just look at the STA itself. Reasoning is "loss of programming source". Sure seems like something could be patched in from one of the other co-owned stations to remedy that situation, but that would require one of those co-owneds to be operational. I can't name a single one of them down here that is.
@lanceventa is right on the money. The STA was filed just after the call sign exchange request, likely due to the perceived notion that EMF might come sniffing around after trying to pick up the calls. Just look at the STA itself. Reasoning is "loss of programming source". Sure seems like something could be patched in from one of the other co-owned stations to remedy that situation, but that would require one of those co-owneds to be operational. I can't name a single one of them down here that is.