• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Audacy Filed For Bankruptcy

It's really hilarious how freaked out some people are getting about this story:


The NY Post article linked in the story quotes one employee as saying "This is scary." Far right media has done a great job convincing it's audience that Soros is the devil.

First of all Audacy owns 223 radio stations. Only 18 of them are news/talk.

Audacy hasn't made the level of investment in conservative talk made by iHeart and Cumulus.

The people who listen to conservative media are not going to change their opinions because their radio station has a new owner. There's nothing that owner can do to change their political opinions, whatever they are.

There's no reason to believe Soros will make content changes in the Audacy stations. As noted, there have been no programming changes made to the LMN stations. Some former Univision employees quit, but the stations they left are still doing the same thing.
 
Last edited:
Different situations.

Cumulus had a Dickey problem and bad management. They deserved to be taken over.

Clear Channel had a deal based on an offer the Mays family and "Red" could not refuse.Red and Lowry wanted to prepare for "senior years" and the two sons were in agreement. Then the depression hit and the buyers tried to back out; courts made them do a deal that everyone knew was not sustainable.

Entercom was a well run company that had absorbed quite a few smaller companies and groups. But the bigger CBS deal met all the "best to worst" financial models for them and the lenders. Then we got the pandemic: radio lost 50% of its revenue and did not recuperate even partially until this year (and it is still just barely at 2019 levels and not adjusted for the huge inflation of the last 4 years.

Entercom, as I have said before, was hit by a perfect storm of the pandemic, hyper price-based inflation and four years of limited if any profitability.

If it were not for the pandemic and the resultant economic issues, Entercom would have been fine.
*insert Beavis/Butthead laugh* "Dickey problem."Beavis_and_Butthead.jpg
 
Last edited:
What'll happen between WAXY and WAQI? Will one of them end up in the same situation as WQBA was post-Univision/HBC merger?
After the Heftel / Tichenor merger (not the Univision acquisition years later), WQBA tried to become the "less Cuban" of the WAQI / WQBA combo. The idea was to appeal to later Cuban immigrants as well as the big and growing Nicaraguan, Colombian and Venezuelan communities in Miami.

I was in charge of trying to make WQBA be more broad and more about lifestyles in Miami and less... lots less... about Cuba and Castro. It did not work. There was just not enough commonality in lifestyle, culture, language usage and interests among the other non-Cuban groups. We tried, and it failed.

Today, the Cuban emigrants who arrived in the 60's and 70's are either gone or over 70 years old now. The younger Cuban first generation immigrants are not as interested in reclaiming what they lost when Castro took over as they had not had property or money for more than two decades. So talking all day about the communists and "restoring" Cuba is of no interest.
 
Now we know to whom JPM Chase likely sold its debt last autumn! :)

I suspect few (if any) traditional banks will be among the equity holders as of the plan effective date; it's going to be a slew of hedge funds.
I don't care for hedge funds. Take Eddie Lampert, for example. As Owner/CEO/whatever of the holding company formed by the merger of K-Mart and Sears, he systematically gutted the company of all its valuable real estate assets, and rather than reinvesting the funds obtained by selling off that real estate, he pocketed it and put it into his hedge fund. It was no surprise, therefore, that K-Mart and Sears died the slow, miserable death that they did.

I doubt that George Soros would do this to Audacy, however. Contrary to anything the far right says, he seems relatively respectable, but I still don't like hedge funds!

c
 
It's really hilarious how freaked out some people are getting about this story:


The NY Post article linked in the story quotes one employee as saying "This is scary." Far right media has done a great job convincing it's audience that Soros is the devil.

First of all Audacy owns 223 radio stations. Only 18 of them are news/talk.

Audacy hasn't made the level of investment in conservative talk made by iHeart and Cumulus.

The people who listen to conservative media are not going to change their opinions because their radio station has a new owner. There's nothing that owner can do to change their political opinions, whatever they are.

There's no reason to believe Soros will make content changes in the Audacy stations. As noted, there have been no programming changes made to the LMN stations. Some former Univision employees quit, but the stations they left are still doing the same thing.
But......but......but subliminal Communist messages in the songs!
 
I don't care for hedge funds. Take Eddie Lampert, for example. As Owner/CEO/whatever of the holding company formed by the merger of K-Mart and Sears, he systematically gutted the company of all its valuable real estate assets, and rather than reinvesting the funds obtained by selling off that real estate, he pocketed it and put it into his hedge fund. It was no surprise, therefore, that K-Mart and Sears died the slow, miserable death that they did.

That tends to be how private equity operates in general. Forstmann-Little and Bain may have taken Citadel and iHeart into bankruptcy, but I can't imagine they lost money themselves. After the Tribune bankruptcy, Zell was reported to have said that he didn't lose money on the deal.

I doubt that George Soros would do this to Audacy, however. Contrary to anything the far right says, he seems relatively respectable, but I still don't like hedge funds!

Soros is a boogeyman to the right-wing, and that's kind of funny to me. He may be a socially liberal Trump hater, but he didn't become a billionaire through socialism and high taxes. He knows and understands that. While I suppose we can't completely rule out that he's buying into Audacy for ideological purposes, he's most likely buying into it thinking he can make money. When your goal is to make money, you're only as liberal (or conservative, for that matter) as the market allows you to be.
 
Soros is a boogeyman to the right-wing, and that's kind of funny to me. He may be a socially liberal Trump hater, but he didn't become a billionaire through socialism and high taxes. He knows and understands that. While I suppose we can't completely rule out that he's buying into Audacy for ideological purposes, he's most likely buying into it thinking he can make money.

I agree. I haven't seen him buy something and then use his power to force his ideology. He invests in companies he believes in, and his money helps them achieve their goals. Then he hopes to make a profit. My take is he approves of the way the company runs its all-news stations, and wants to see them preserved. No other radio company is that invested in all-news as a format.
 
But......but......but subliminal Communist messages in the songs!
Soros doesn’t strike me as a music guy (and neither does his son, who runs the day-to-day now), so the Soros family investing in a radio conglomerate with a lot of music stations is interesting to say the least.

I doubt that we’re suddenly going to be hearing Rage Against the Machine on WXRT all the same.
 
That tends to be how private equity operates in general. Forstmann-Little and Bain may have taken Citadel and iHeart into bankruptcy, but I can't imagine they lost money themselves.
I think the Clear Channel deal was not profitable in that they had to be forced to complete it even when they knew the vale had declined along with revenue.
 
I think the Clear Channel deal was not profitable in that they had to be forced to complete it even when they knew the vale had declined along with revenue.

Apparently Bain and Lee broke even as of the bankruptcy in 2018;

In the end, the two firms will emerge from the restructuring with a 10% ownership stake and reportedly still break even, in part because they bought the debt at ultra-low, pre-Recession levels.
 
Apparently Bain and Lee broke even as of the bankruptcy in 2018;
But… “breaking even“ means a zero return on capital, plus the loss in the value of the money due to inflation.
 
An ironic chuckle from us in Houston, as Bain Capital also had a stake in Cumulus Media Partners, which owned two FMs here. As Clear Channel already had five FMs in the market, Bain was considered over the market cap and CC was forced to divest KHMX and KLOL. To whom? CBS Radio, which of course is now Audacy.🤪🤭
The reason Clear Channel was forced to divest KHMX & KLOL in 2008 wasn’t the FCC’s market cap but the DOJ was concerned about market concentration of revenue and wouldn’t approve the deal without the sale.
 
A few more details on the court proceedings:

George Soros' fund owns 40%+ of the company debt with other large debtholders being HG Vora Capital Management, SI Capital Commercial Finance, and PGIM.

While the company says trade and other unsecured creditors will not be impaired, existing shareholders are expected to be wiped out, while high-ranking creditors like Soros would be repaid with stock in the restructured company in a debt-for-equity swap.

Oracle America, and 5670 Wilshire Owner were the only two creditors who filed objections to the plan.
 
One thing not included in the reporting is if Field has accepted the new employment offer. Only mention is this:

The new Board of Directors of Audacy will include Field or any successor as CEO, a Chairman and two other members selected by Soros Fund Management as majority shareholder (and an additional member should it increase its holdings to 50.1% of the company), two others nominated by the other First Lien debt-holders, and the Second Lien debt-holders will choose one member as long as they hold 80% of the outstanding common stock.

Key words: Field or any successor as CEO. So the decision hasn't been made. I think he has until May.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom