• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Good Karma and Nielsen

As some have speculated, Good Karma has indeed stopped purchasing the Nielsen book in their markets.

 
It was kinda inevitable. Good Karma hasn't subscribed to Nielsen in Cleveland since 2007, and the contracts ending were inherited from Scripps (Milwaukee) or Disney (everywhere else).
 
Craig Karmazin once referred to the then-Arbitron ratings as the product of “a telemarketing agency” in a 2008 Crain’s Cleveland Business article. And that was well before WKNR ventured into social media and digital platforms.

If Arbitron was not worth the added expense even in 2008, why would that have changed with Nielsen in 2024? Good Karma is simply removing money-bleeding expenditures that would have made sense only for a company like Disney, where the stations were merely budget line items.
 
It's an important issue. As broadcasting moves from it's traditional platform to a more diverse package of digital outlets, the need for the PPM is less important. I know owners can see the demographics of the people who use any of their digital products, from social media to YouTube videos. That's what's important in PPM. Not who wins the ratings, but the actual demographics of who is using the content. Nielsen doesn't measure podcasts or non-linear content such as produced highlights from sports events. That's what GKB does. It makes perfect sense to me.
 
It's an important issue. As broadcasting moves from it's traditional platform to a more diverse package of digital outlets, the need for the PPM is less important. I know owners can see the demographics of the people who use any of their digital products, from social media to YouTube videos. That's what's important in PPM. Not who wins the ratings, but the actual demographics of who is using the content. Nielsen doesn't measure podcasts or non-linear content such as produced highlights from sports events. That's what GKB does. It makes perfect sense to me.
And if listeners download the app onto their phone, the owners can see all sorts of stuff, maybe even a little bit of keylogging. Who knows?

The point being that getting your app on someone's phone is a big deal, as an app can be a convenient data mining tool, something that can help a media service target ads to certain demos and individuals.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom