• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Airchecks from cassette tapes

I'm re-digitizing some cassette tapes and am looking for opinions on the following:

There's obviously a gap in audio with the tape leader and when flipping over the cassette from one side to another. My past practice has been to have each side of the cassette as a separate file. But I can also paste the two sides together in the same file. The gap, of course, remains. So which would seem better - having each side of the tape digitized to a separate file? - or put the two sides together in the same file? I can see pros and cons either way.
 
I'm re-digitizing some cassette tapes and am looking for opinions on the following:

There's obviously a gap in audio with the tape leader and when flipping over the cassette from one side to another. My past practice has been to have each side of the cassette as a separate file. But I can also paste the two sides together in the same file. The gap, of course, remains. So which would seem better - having each side of the tape digitized to a separate file? - or put the two sides together in the same file? I can see pros and cons either way.
My preference would be for fading out side 1, giving it 3 seconds of dead air, and then fading in side 2, all in one file. Assuming you're not sampling at such a high bit rate that the file is extraordinarily large.
 
My preference would be for fading out side 1, giving it 3 seconds of dead air, and then fading in side 2, all in one file. Assuming you're not sampling at such a high bit rate that the file is extraordinarily large.
These are coming off C-110 cassettes, so file sizes are ones I can easily handle. I just finished a bunch of airchecks from Hi-Fi VCR tapes which can run up to 8h10m, and those I did have to split up. Sometimes I could split them logically because they had discrete programs; others, I just split in half. File sizes were pretty big even so.

Some of these will eventually go to archives in Missouri, so I'm trying to do both lossy and lossless formats.
 
I think it entirely depends on the goal/purpose for the resulting digital files. Are they to be actual, near-identical representations of the physical tapes? If so, it might be best to make each side a separate digital file (as you’re doing) — because each side was originally “separate” (plus, content might also be more easily discoverable by future users). Or, is it more content-driven? For example, do the two sides present a single show/program? If so, it would seem to make more sense to combine them into a single file (so future users could easily find the specific program or show they’re seeking).

In this sense, I would think consideration also should be given to the anticipated future use. You mentioned some of the digital files are ultimately destined for Missouri archives. Whether this refers to an academic institution, state broadcasters association, or something else, I cannot tell. Either way, however, it sounds like they’re for archival, “historic” storage purposes (for use, potentially, by future documentarians or historians, possibly). If that’s the case, then separate files for each side would seem most appropriate.

Conversely, if presenting complete programs/shows today is the goal, a single file of individual programs/shows (combining the cassette sides) would seem highly appropriate (plus, in this scenario, I’d also see no reason to not remove the “gaps” from the leader tape). That’s what I’m doing here, in presenting today old airchecks — of distinct individual shows — from my former all-request radio show:

The Jukebox: Radio Archive (June 19, 1999)

For this podcast — which presents full shows — I even add “swoosh” SFX whenever audio is cut off (due to cassette tape running out), as in this example. Plus, in show notes for this episode, I even included the following explanatory note:

05:42 Tom/Rochester (“All I Have To Do Is Dream”) (Note: Cassette tape ran out in the middle of this phone call; it would seem as though I flipped over the tape during on-air playback of the call)

In summary, I’d say it mostly depends on how you foresee future users using the files.
 
I've been digitizing mine...I usually leave a little gap between sides. To keep me motivated to keep digitizing them since I have hundreds and hundreds of tapes that are deteriorating...as well as old folders of bumper stickers, notes, and radio station history from my days running 100000watts[.]com, I've turned into a project and post the scoped versions of them and musings and history on a Substack (since I also had a 2024 goal to try to work on writing this year...so I'm cleaning out boxes in the closet, digitizing old airchecks, and working on writing at the same time...).

I just sent out the newest one from this week if any of these airchecks are of interest to anyone...

Radio This Week Back Then #22: June 16-22...

Capital 95.8, Kiss 100, Virgin 1215 London, 1994
WPLJ and WHTZ New York, 1991
KEGL D/FW, 1990
WAAF Boston, 1991
KZBS and KJYO Oklahoma City, 1989
WSSX and WCOO Charleston, 2010
WZBQ Tuscaloosa, 2010

I have just over 200 of them converted...the index is here Aircheck Index. You can search in the search box to filter it or sort the columns to change the order.
 
In this sense, I would think consideration also should be given to the anticipated future use. You mentioned some of the digital files are ultimately destined for Missouri archives. Whether this refers to an academic institution, state broadcasters association, or something else, I cannot tell.
State historical society.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom