• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

NPR Adds Editorial Oversight

So now we're back to hiring decisions based on political party. BTW NPR isn't the only news organization that receives federal funds.
But it is the major domestic-targeted audio content one.
The Voice of America is FULLY funded by taxpayers. Yet no one has demanded to know the political parties of anyone at VOA. Probably because they have no idea it even exists.
Or because they know that the VOA programs to international audiences who do not vote in American Elections.

VOA reporting about "things" in the USA tend to cover subjects that are not political, whether they be social, economic or cultural.
 
Or because they know that the VOA programs to international audiences who do not vote in American Elections.

I thought the issue was about unbiased reporting and taxpayer funding. Not about influencing elections. Whoops!

VOA reporting about "things" in the USA tend to cover subjects that are not political, whether they be social, economic or cultural.

Although they did cover the Hunter Biden laptop story, and referred to it as an ''October Surprise.''

I think the way NPR News is going to end up handling this is by eliminating any political coverage other than strictly saying this or that happened without any detail.
 
Last edited:
NPR News has hired someone for editorial oversight:

 
When NPR announced this editorial oversight back in May, they also said the funding for it came from an anonymous donor.

Now it's been revealed (to no one's surprise) that source is CPB

Well it's to some people's surprise because they kept it a secret. What was the reason for that? Seems like it should have been welcomed as a good thing all along but keeping it anonymous just raised questions and suspicions.
 
Well it's to some people's surprise because they kept it a secret. What was the reason for that? Seems like it should have been welcomed as a good thing all along but keeping it anonymous just raised questions and suspicions.

It's up to CPB to make that announcement, not NPR. When the announcement came, it came from CPB. It's their money, and they decide how and when the announcement is made.
 
It's up to CPB to make that announcement, not NPR. When the announcement came, it came from CPB. It's their money, and they decide how and when the announcement is made.
I'm not sure I agree.

NPR can set its own standards for how it handles significant donations. If its leadership decides that accepting a large anonymous donation might raise questions about the impartiality of its news product (and there's good reason to think it might), NPR would be entirely within its rights to tell a donor it will only accept funding if its source is disclosed.

And as an actual government-funded entity, everything CPB does should be disclosed transparently.

(Disclaimer: I am an occasional freelance contributor to NPR News. These are solely my opinions.)
 
NPR would be entirely within its rights to tell a donor it will only accept funding if its source is disclosed.

Which is what happened. What they received last spring was a pledge. But the actual grant didn't come until now, and that's when it was disclosed.

The grant came at the same time as several others, so that leads me to believe this is the normal timetable for CPB grants.


In an earlier article I posted in this thread, the source of the funding was referred to in this way:

Chapin, upon being pressed on the matter by Michel Martin, a host of NPR’s “Morning Edition,” declined to identify the source. Chapin, however, did say during an editorial meeting at NPR’s Washington, D.C. headquarters that the funder’s identity wouldn’t come as a surprise to NPR’s editorial staff.

At the time, I thought it might be CPB, and I was right.
 
Last edited:
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom