• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Buyouts not enough to prevent KQED layoffs

Unfortunately, the drumbeat of public-media layoffs continues, with KQED stating that the acceptance of its buyout offers is not enough to forestall layoffs. No union-represented employees accepted buyout packages, according to KQED. From the SFGate (which will deposit a ridiculous amount of cookies in your browser, so proceed accordingly):

 
And some of us keep repeating: Considering the loss of advertising/underwriting nationwide, expect many more cuts to come. And no, it's not 'fatcat management' or 'bean counters' keeping down the man, it's lack of advertising, plus a public weary of the onslaught of charities all vying for your dollar known recently as 'donor fatigue'.
 
And some of us keep repeating: Considering the loss of advertising/underwriting nationwide, expect many more cuts to come. And no, it's not 'fatcat management' or 'bean counters' keeping down the man, it's lack of advertising, plus a public weary of the onslaught of charities all vying for your dollar known recently as 'donor fatigue'.
As a fatigued donor, I fully understand.

I also believe that they might do better if they tried to replicate what WETA does in the DC market, which is to incorporate both news and music.
 
As a fatigued donor, I fully understand.

I also believe that they might do better if they tried to replicate what WETA does in the DC market, which is to incorporate both news and music.
I've watched the WETA begathon, and don't really see anything different in presentation than any other public TV station.

I think donor fatigue is the combination of fundraising from all sources: Retail ('would you like to round up your purchase to help wayward radio nerds?'), TV: kids who are now 30 years old pitching for Shriner's Hospital, homeless teens, ASPCA, various veterans organizations, instruments for teens, Commercial Radio: Kars for Kids, the list goes on and on. Then public stations take a week to fund raise every quarter. Given the high price of food and living, once someone feels guilty about the shivering dog on TV and gives their $19.99 per month, they don't have enough disposable income to give their local NPR affiliate another $19 a month.
 
Unfortunately, the drumbeat of public-media layoffs continues, with KQED stating that the acceptance of its buyout offers is not enough to forestall layoffs. No union-represented employees accepted buyout packages, according to KQED. From the SFGate (which will deposit a ridiculous amount of cookies in your browser, so proceed accordingly):

Obiously u need to paywall to access SFGATE's parent site SF Chronicle. Typical Hearst, we are now cashstrapped in subscriptions and donations.
 
And some of us keep repeating: Considering the loss of advertising/underwriting nationwide, expect many more cuts to come. And no, it's not 'fatcat management' or 'bean counters' keeping down the man, it's lack of advertising, plus a public weary of the onslaught of charities all vying for your dollar known recently as 'donor fatigue'.
Public radio doesnt do ads, just sponsorships which are different part of how pubilc radio does have "commercial" breaks.
 
I've watched the WETA begathon, and don't really see anything different in presentation than any other public TV station.

I think donor fatigue is the combination of fundraising from all sources: Retail ('would you like to round up your purchase to help wayward radio nerds?'), TV: kids who are now 30 years old pitching for Shriner's Hospital, homeless teens, ASPCA, various veterans organizations, instruments for teens, Commercial Radio: Kars for Kids, the list goes on and on. Then public stations take a week to fund raise every quarter. Given the high price of food and living, once someone feels guilty about the shivering dog on TV and gives their $19.99 per month, they don't have enough disposable income to give their local NPR affiliate another $19 a month.
People should be capable of deciding which cause they choose to support. You can avoid "Donor Fatigue" by saying No. Many folks bemoan that they're strapped for cash, but they don't seem to have any trouble getting daily Amazon deliveries or a $10 Starbucks coffee each morning.

Times change. TV networks gutted news programming because it was too expensive. Printed versions of Newspapers and magazines are nearly extinct. Commercial and Public Radio have issues to address. However, you can't cut your way to prosperity...
 
Last edited:
The changes in the amount of money someone can deduct as a charitable donation haven’t helped. The standard deduction is higher now and itemizing is required to deduct charitable giving. Plus if you get something from a public radio/TV station for donating, that can impact how much of the donation you can deduct. This site has more info & talks about how the tax deductible donation limits have changed:
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom