Assuming media consumers are somehow fatigued by radio or TV isn't accurate. I instead contribute to the losses in traditional media use to increases in consumers spending more time on social media, or getting their 'news' or entertainment online.I really don't think it's "donor fatigue" as much as TV/radio fatigue.
Back in the early 2000s, the traditional media company I worked for paid for a fairly extensive study on media consumption trends. Aside from a couple of misses like hyper-local news publishing becoming a thing, they hit the target by predicting increasing use of the Internet would create a 'two-way' form of media consumption that traditional media can't compete with.
That turned out to be true. After all; here we are having a textual conversation via an Internet forum rather than actively listening to the radio or watching TV.
There are several out there, but here's a blog from Indiana University intended for charity organizations talking about the donor fatigue theory and potentially how to avoid it:Is there any proof that the average American donates less money to charities in 2024 than in 2020 or 2010? Yes, inflation has made us all reevaluate our spending. But inflation is now close to manageable levels. Unemployment is at a record low. The stock market is at a record high.
Donor fatigue; is it real?
Over the last year we’ve heard a lot about fatigue—pandemic fatigue, COVID fatigue, Zoom fatigue. You may be experiencing all of these and more including donor fatigue. The question is, while you may be feeling it, is it real?
blog.philanthropy.indianapolis.iu.edu
So, as you can see, charitable giving, whether it is for public media or other causes is concerned about the same things.
Statistically what you say is true, but the emphasis on ratings as being some sort of bellwether for the success or failure of traditional media (radio/TV) is completely overblown in modern times. Media customers are donors or advertisers, not just numbers of listeners or viewers. Advertisers have moved toward the digital/Internet media model of advertising, forcing traditional media to compete with the same. Also, online advertising inherently comes with analytics which provide almost immediate data about what type of consumer is seeing or paying attention to an ad. Using AI, those analytics can provide so much more lifestyle and demographic data than a thousand one-way media consumers wearing a PPM device, or filling out a diary. And that online data is super cheap by comparison.In fact, if you look at the ratings for each large market, you see public radio listening is stronger than ten or twenty years ago. WNYC-FM is #10 in NYC. It wasn't that long ago it was around #17 or so. WAMU is #1 in Washington, KQED-FM #2 in San Francisco, KPBS-FM #2 San Diego, WBUR #4 and WGBH #10 in Boston. I'd say if you looked at ratings in 2000, these stations were not this highly rated. But we can also say public radio takes up a larger slice of a shrinking pie. Being #2 in 2024 means you probably have fewer people listening than being #10 in 2000.
But that's the thing, podcasting may be the buzz, but many media organizations have needed to cut their budgets which included podcasts, because there are so many online all competing for the same ad dollar. The podcast media market is completely saturated, so except for folks like Joe Rogan, nobody is making money in podcasting either.The same thing that's happening to ad sales on commercial stations is happening to donations on public radio stations. In a world of streaming and podcasts, we just aren't listening as much and donating as much as in past decades.