With the way most 'high-tech' radio stations have treated the 'call letters / city of license' FCC requirement like we treat junk mail, I find it curious that nowhere I've tuned in have I heard something like
. _ _ _ _ . _ _ . . _ . . _ _ . . . . _ , . _ . _ . _ .. . . . _ . . . _ . . . _ . . .
(WQDD Girardville)
the way a wee licensed station some friends had up this way years ago used each hour. It used the regular, spoken ID, of course. That gave the calls, COL, and 'serving (three other localities in the signal area)', and ran :08. Often we'd use it to nail the vocal of a song. But the series of those long distance / short wave image beeps, moderately punched to run discreetly for :14 seconds, were sheer added image. The station was easy listening Standards that was designed to sound like some tropical grass hut on a shore for 9 months, and a log cabin chalet for three in winter. Same music all year.
The small WQDD used them just for added effect -- a bit of nostalgia style, so no problem there. For example, WTIC in Hartford CT, instead of a TOH time tone, uses that reassuring, quirky 4-beep Beethoven's 5th riff.
Now, from what I've heard and read, Morse Code ID's on FCC licensed stations are valid and legal. It would seem possible for some stations to actually ID the station that way if they desired.
So many radio ads regale patience with senselessly auctioneered obedience to the disclaimer mandates. Many bury the calls and some distasteful, tertiary, shoehorned COLs as quickly as can be arranged in compliant disgust. So why not give an equally rapid-fire, super World War 2 'fist' of a legal Morse ID instead? The five or six seconds it would take could be mixed with or under anything ; music, jingles, disclaimers, show-theme pads ..... would tend to stand out and cause some curiosity ..... and (engineers here, pls?) might benefit AM radio stations. Especially at DX time, hi.
I pose that last muse as a question, because those solid 100% modulation tones really cut through the clutter on DX tests (I think the 800 hz ones are more incisive than the 1000 hz ones are, but that's by the by).
Engineers here: Just curious. Would PPM meters in a moving NYC car tuned to a shoehorned Class A *FM* frequency with alternating and oft-overlapping signals -- 92.7, 94.3, 107.1 and the like -- and given that all are PPM encoded when they transmit -- tend to respond, recognize, and count a tone more readily than other music or voice audio?
In any event, God Bless KPH. The @$$umption here is that they'll be starting at 8:01 EDST, so I should find a decent SW radio between now and then.