What is "true internet radio"? The figures are based on people listening to live radio broadcast services over the internet, regardless of platform. It could be smart speaker, TuneIn, an app, a station's own website, but it's all radio. Spotify and the like don't come into it.^^^ That could be because of Spotify Sirus XM and Tunein not true internet radio
What is "true internet radio"? The figures are based on people listening to live radio broadcast services over the internet, regardless of platform. It could be smart speaker, TuneIn, an app, a station's own website, but it's all radio. Spotify and the like don't come into it.
I think what you're moaning about is that nobody is listening to your internet radio station, despite it having "168k traxx".

I am well aware of what Spotify is, as I'm sure are most of the people on this site given its subject matter. I'm still not sure what point you're trying to make.Spotify is a on demand service where you get to pick what you want to listen to when you want to, with internet radio you just to what is being played you have no choice.
if a little driveway damage affects the "value" of your home you have serious problems. It's a house! live in it!Cable TV WAS job one for Cox. Now they're trying to be a cell phone provider that also deals with internet. Other cable companies are doing the same thing, but I don't know if they're as aggressive as Cox has been with the mobile side.
Fiber companies are building out in many areas. However, some contractors have been hasty and causing property damage when they lay the fiber, giving homeowners a headache and leaving a bad taste in people's mouths.
![]()
'Someone's got to be responsible': Gilbert residents say high-speed fiber optic internet project damaged their property
The Town of Gilbert says they aren't responsible for the damage. Residents push back, saying the town signed off on the permits and are making money on the deal.www.12news.com
Back in 2005, I was mostly listening to songs I'd ripped from my own CDs and mp3's obtained elsewhere. Streaming music was mostly limited to OTA radio stations. I listened a lot to WOXY, with a modern rock format unavailable in my area. In those days, there weren't that many streaming music alternatives. I still listen to streams of interesting radio outside my area (KEXP etc) but most of my streaming now is Spotify. I'm not surprised that streaming and DAB are catching up with OTA listening, but with all the other music options out there, it's a different world.I am well aware of what Spotify is, as I'm sure are most of the people on this site given its subject matter. I'm still not sure what point you're trying to make.
Perhaps he's referring to independent, internet radio stations. There were a lot of them in the early days. I worked with a guy who had one he started in 2003-2004 or so. It was combined with another operation in 2010, and although that combined operation is still running, who knows how many listeners it actually gets? A lot of small independent internet radio stations are struggling.I am well aware of what Spotify is, as I'm sure are most of the people on this site given its subject matter. I'm still not sure what point you're trying to make.
This is not a problem that everyone has. Obviously I can't know what your technical issue. I get my wireless internet though my cable company and it's great all the time. I stream on an old Toshiba flat screen tv with a Roku.Here we are, almost 25 years into the 21st century, and for some reason, we still can't get streaming working quite right.
We have virtually unlimited bandwidth, always on connections, and more content than ever, so why do we get choppiness and stuttering when we should be getting that smooth perfection with boundless content choices that we've been promised for, what, 30 plus years now?
I'm just frustrated because every time I go to try streaming something, it'll work for a little while, but it'll inevitably fail either with some sort of vague error that doesn't make any sense, or it will simply go silent for no reason. Sometimes it will get glitchy sounding and skip parts of songs. Sometimes it will not work in the first place.
All this on a tested and known working 1 Gbps internet connection.
Meanwhile, every other alternative is being slowly taken away, either via attrition because all the "good" content is being redirected to streams (broadcast radio and TV), or because the medium carrying said content is disappearing altogether.
It's not just audio streams, either.
I recently got new TV service, and when I asked the technician where the TV box was, he brought this little IPTV device that had only three ports for Ethernet, HDMI and power that only seems to work on certain TVs (I have a 10 or 15 year old LG that's perfectly fine and has at least two good working HDMI inputs that have worked fine with everything else, except inexplicably for this box).
Anyway, I managed to find another TV that worked, and I've been watching it for awhile now.
It's decent, and has a fair selection of channels that seem better than the other service I had, but the picture is choppy. I mean, it's sharp and everything, but the motion isn't smooth. Plus it buffers and glitches every now and then for no apparent reason (same fast connection that works perfectly fine otherwise).
Is it just me having bad luck, or do people actually put up with this mediocre and inconsistent performance from their modern entertainment services?
I never had these problems with analog radio and TV.
c
AAC-HE at 24bps isn't bad, and sounds OK on cheap speakers at 16kb. We keep a coupe demo streams up that I had forgotten about:I was playing around a bit this morning, so for fun I thought I'd set up a local Icecast stream using the lowest possible settings (8kbps with an 8000kHz sample rate) to see how it works.
It's undoubtedly very dial up friendly, but it sounds absolutely horrible, pretty much on par with typical telephone on-hold music. I don't recommend that anyone use these settings unless, for some bizarre reason, they still are on dial up. Using a 9,600 bit/s modem.
I couldn't set the bit-depth for some reason, or else I could probably make it sound even worse.
c
It literally is that. I wouldn't be surprised if call centers use it to feed their hold music.It's undoubtedly very dial up friendly, but it sounds absolutely horrible, pretty much on par with typical telephone on-hold music.
That 24 kbps demo is actually really impressive.AAC-HE at 24bps isn't bad, and sounds OK on cheap speakers at 16kb. We keep a coupe demo streams up that I had forgotten about:
It's actually 32 kbps streamThat 24 kbps demo is actually really impressive.
General
Complete name : Z:\groovesalad-32-aac.aac
Format : ADTS
Format/Info : Audio Data Transport Stream
File size : 480 KiB
Overall bit rate mode : Variable
Audio
Format : AAC
Format/Info : Advanced Audio Codec
Format version : Version 2
Format profile : HE-AAC / LC
Bit rate mode : Variable
Bit rate : 31.2 Kbps
Channel(s) : 2 channels
Channel positions : Front: L R
Sampling rate : 44.1 KHz / 22.05 KHz
Compression mode : Lossy
Stream size : 480 KiB (100%)