• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Investing in cable networks

It seems like several cable stations are still investing in licensed series that might be expensive for them. For example, both Comedy Central and Adult Swim have gotten non-exclusive rights to Family Guy and Nick at Nite got The Big Bang Theory. Are companies still shelling out a lot of money to acquire shows for their cable nets?
 
I think there's a big difference between licensing a successful off-net series and investing in first run scripted shows. They have to run something, and off-net syndication is cheaper than creating new programming.
Still, some of the bigger name shows probably cost quite a bit. A lot of studios are licensing their content again...for example Big Bang used to just exclusively be on TBS and Family Guy FXX, now they are being licensed for use elsewhere, too. But if I remember those shows cost a lot, so surprised networks are still paying for them. I remember HBO Max (now Max) paying half a billion for Big Bang in 2019.
 
Still, some of the bigger name shows probably cost quite a bit. A lot of studios are licensing their content again...for example Big Bang used to just exclusively be on TBS and Family Guy FXX, now they are being licensed for use elsewhere, too. But if I remember those shows cost a lot, so surprised networks are still paying for them. I remember HBO Max (now Max) paying half a billion for Big Bang in 2019.
You do know the prices go down as a show ages?
 
"A lot" is relative. I don't think it was announced how much TBS is paying for those rights, so "a lot" could be any number. It's surely less than the eyewatering numbers Friends or Seinfeld got 20 years ago.
Still seems like cable viewership is fairly low for them to be shelling out any sum of cash to bulk them up.
 
If TBS can't "shell out any sum of cash", how are networks like CMT or Lifetime, which have much smaller audiences, still able to exist?

They get paid a fee from the cable companies and they sell advertising. So there's some income. And, like radio, they've cut their staff to the bone.
 
Based on ... what?

TBS is in the top tier of cable networks. If TBS can't "shell out any sum of cash", how are networks like CMT or Lifetime, which have much smaller audiences, still able to exist?
No, Nick at Nite bought Big Bang too...that's who I'm talking about. TBS has it until 2028. Comedy Central also bought Family Guy and Adult Swim did too. All of those aren't top 10 cable channels.
 
Maybe the fact that three different sets of cable executives agreeing to buy the same show is a sign that your perception of the death of cable TV is exaggerated.
 
How much of the op is really about production wanting their content via Pluto, tubi and Samsung TV based their data of their target demos.




 





Thus could be a factor here but it's not about traditional cable directly but a focus on streaming TV apps like Xumo, Tubi, PlutoTV and Samsung TV Plus. Ad inventory is also a factor here.
 

If there are production companies really “investing in cable” the reality is the deal is being tied to FAST Free and Streaming Television apps. Case and point how Fox Television stations are putting efforts in streaming such as Live Now and Local Fox Owned stations over on Tubi.

Last year, the Fox streaming news channel LiveNow leveraged user data to add a viewer tally to its broadcast. The rolling figure was a small but critical update, part of LiveNow’s endless efforts to improve its relatively new product, first iterated 10 years ago.
“It obviously is valuable for us to know how many people are watching at any given time,” said Emily Stone, Fox VP of digital content and LiveNow. “For our team, it allows us to make better content decisions. When you see that number go up, you know that people are really interested, and we’re not going to take that content away from them.”

Conversely, if the number goes down, producers will take that as a signal to change things up on the air and find some more compelling content.

Stone also observed that the ticker has an impact on viewers, too.

“When you’re in that live viewing experience … you’re really interested in how many people you’re watching with, and it creates a sense of community,” she said. “That’s a really big deal for LiveNow.”
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom