• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Cumulus shutdown tracker

Question: Can a broadcaster legally take an AM station off the air, move its formatting to an HD subchannel of one of its FM stations, and then reroute the translator to broadcast the HD2 (or whatever) subchannel of the FM? I suspect it's legal (I'm thikinng that the latest time this happened was in St. George, Utah, when KHKR-AM was yanked from the air), but I don't really know.
It depends on how the translator was originally constructed/licensed. If it was bound to the AM, under current regulations, no. If the AM dies, the translator goes with it. If it was not "bound" to an AM during its original license, then yes, it can re-broadcast any station. There was also a class of translators that were bound for a specific time period, but most, if not all, of those are now able to be re-assigned to any station. @fybush, correct or did I miss something?
 
Question: Can a broadcaster legally take an AM station off the air, move its formatting to an HD subchannel of one of its FM stations, and then reroute the translator to broadcast the HD2 (or whatever) subchannel of the FM?
Yes, assuming the translator wasn’t “tied” to the AM under FCC regulations.
 
Question: Can a broadcaster legally take an AM station off the air, move its formatting to an HD subchannel of one of its FM stations, and then reroute the translator to broadcast the HD2 (or whatever) subchannel of the FM?

It seems to me the issue would be how the station obtained the translator. If it was part of the AM rejuvenation plan, and it was attached to an AM, then I don't think it can be split off.
 
Woof. Inside Radio is really killing it again, including Audacy’s KMOX as an example where Cumulus kept the AM signal but added an FM simulcast. 🙄
The wording is just vague enough that they can say they were simply using KMOX as an example of what they were talking about, without actually (mistakenly) claiming it's owned by Cumulus.

But in that case, writing it as "That played out Monday in St. Louis as the Audacy-owned legacy AM powerhouse 'News Radio 1120' KMOX..." would've been a well-needed clarification.
 
The article doesn't mention that the station in question is owned by Cumulus. But they are now syndicating its programming to other co-owned stations in the region:


This is part of the same strategy that is affecting a number of Cumulus AMs. In these cases, they're not shutting the stations down, but replacing the local programming with that from a nearby station.
 
Question: Can a broadcaster legally take an AM station off the air, move its formatting to an HD subchannel of one of its FM stations, and then reroute the translator to broadcast the HD2 (or whatever) subchannel of the FM? I suspect it's legal (I'm thikinng that the latest time this happened was in St. George, Utah, when KHKR-AM was yanked from the air), but I don't really know.
Depends...

Some AMs were granted FM translators as part of the AM revitalization program and the FM translator is bound to the AM for a period of time (4 years??? I don't remember exactly).

In cases where an owner simply acquired or had a FM translator in the cluster that they happened to use to relay an AM station, they can change the originating station to another station or HD subchannel.
 
And, just so it doesn't get lost, Cumulus took 560 in San Francisco (the old KSFO) off the air last week.
To bring this back around to the original purpose of the thread, I think you can argue that the station whose plug was pulled on March 3 was actually KGO…KZAC was a placeholder on 560 while KSFO swallowed up the old KGO when it moved to 810. It was pretty obvious that KZAC wasn’t a long-term proposition. Strictly speaking, yes, it was KZAC 560 that was shut down but the real corpse was KGO.
 
I’m keeping an eye on a couple of Missouri Cumulus stations as candidates for the radio boneyard.
 
To bring this back around to the original purpose of the thread, I think you can argue that the station whose plug was pulled on March 3 was actually KGO…KZAC was a placeholder on 560 while KSFO swallowed up the old KGO when it moved to 810. It was pretty obvious that KZAC wasn’t a long-term proposition. Strictly speaking, yes, it was KZAC 560 that was shut down but the real corpse was KGO.

KGO's been a corpse since 2011. And then there was the defiling of the corpse (the sports betting format) in 2022.

Screw semantics. Cumulus is keeping 810 on the air and has pulled the plug on 560. Period.
 
KGO's been a corpse since 2011. And then there was the defiling of the corpse (the sports betting format) in 2022.

But it was still on the air, as KGO, even if unrecognizable in the sports-betting format. The all-news format, and the successor talk format were clearly branded as KGO.

The term “zombie” would be more appropriate, in my opinion.
Screw semantics. Cumulus is keeping 810 on the air and has pulled the plug on 560. Period.
If you view it strictly as a matter of frequencies, yes. When you bring actual programming into the picture, it’s more nuanced.
 
Question: Can a broadcaster legally take an AM station off the air, move its formatting to an HD subchannel of one of its FM stations, and then reroute the translator to broadcast the HD2 (or whatever) subchannel of the FM? I suspect it's legal (I'm thikinng that the latest time this happened was in St. George, Utah, when KHKR-AM was yanked from the air), but I don't really know.
It happened at the end of 2024 in the VT/NH Upper Valley. WTSL Hanover, NH, was running an adult contemporary format on 1400 AM along with a couple of translators. In late December, 1400 went dark, along with one of the translators (97.5). The format was continued on an HD subchannel of WHDQ Claremont, and the 106.7 translator previously used to carry the oldies format that WHDQ had been running on the HD subchannel started carrying the AC programming that replaced the oldies. Interestingly, 600-watt 96.3 WFYX Walpole also had been carrying the oldies format and flipped to AC as well. (Radio-Locator, as is its habit, still thinks it's an oldies station.)
 
Last edited:
Question: Can a broadcaster legally take an AM station off the air, move its formatting to an HD subchannel of one of its FM stations, and then reroute the translator to broadcast the HD2 (or whatever) subchannel of the FM?
In most cases, yes.

There is an exception, for certain stations which received an FM translator during a special filing window, where the licenses for the AM and the translator are permanently tied together.
I think this was the window which closed February 2018, but the FCC's Third Report & Order which established it has vanished from the Commission's web site so I can't check the details.
 
But it was still on the air, as KGO, even if unrecognizable in the sports-betting format. The all-news format, and the successor talk format were clearly branded as KGO.

The term “zombie” would be more appropriate, in my opinion.

If you view it strictly as a matter of frequencies, yes. When you bring actual programming into the picture, it’s more nuanced.

Programming is intellectual property, Mark. It can be and has been transferred, along with call letters from frequency to frequency, for decades, in markets across the country.

The signal on a frequency is what's gone dark, in the case of 560.
 
Programming is intellectual property, Mark. It can be and has been transferred, along with call letters from frequency to frequency, for decades, in markets across the country.

Did I say otherwise?
The signal on a frequency is what's gone dark, in the case of 560.
What, then, would you call the extinguishing of intellectual property?

By the way, until the 560 license is surrendered, I don’t think it should be called a corpse. Comatose, or perhaps hibernating.
 


Back
Top Bottom