If I'm not mistaken, KQ played that Jayhawks track when it was new. Closing Time is a bit crispy at this point, the Jayhawks makes people do a double-take. Which for stunting is exactly what you want.
If I'm not mistaken, KQ played that Jayhawks track when it was new. Closing Time is a bit crispy at this point, the Jayhawks makes people do a double-take. Which for stunting is exactly what you want.
I mean, this is still the "stunting" phase but at some point KQ HAS to update their music library (as does 93X). If the demo is 25-54 that means that someone who was 25 in 1995 (and thus would probably really resonate with 80s-90s rock) is now 55.A classic rockish format with a very pronounced 80s / 90s classic alt lean sure seems to be the way KQRS is headed.
KQRS.tunegenie.com for detailed hourly song logs.
I mean, this is still the "stunting" phase but at some point KQ HAS to update their music library (as does 93X). If the demo is 25-54 that means that someone who was 25 in 1995 (and thus would probably really resonate with 80s-90s rock) is now 55.
To stay in the demo, you'd almost have to put the "center" of the format at around 1995, and basically play music from 1985-2005 (with a heaver emphasis on the 90s, a lower emphasis on the 80s and early 2000s). The problem is, I just described where 93X is CURRENTLY.
Now, if they emphasize the "lighter" side of rock and 93X stays to the "heavier" side of that same period, that might work, and is similar to where they were this morning.
If your target is 25-54 or somewhere inside that, you research on the core where the "hump in the graph" is.I mean, this is still the "stunting" phase but at some point KQ HAS to update their music library (as does 93X). If the demo is 25-54 that means that someone who was 25 in 1995 (and thus would probably really resonate with 80s-90s rock) is now 55.
To stay in the demo, you'd almost have to put the "center" of the format at around 1995, and basically play music from 1985-2005 (with a heaver emphasis on the 90s, a lower emphasis on the 80s and early 2000s). The problem is, I just described where 93X is CURRENTLY.
Now, if they emphasize the "lighter" side of rock and 93X stays to the "heavier" side of that same period, that might work, and is similar to where they were this morning.
So far seems like a lot of hype to not much of a format change. First song after the first break was Tom Petty. They rebranded the morning show to "Gorman in the Morning" but the station has remained KQRS which I'm good with. They have Gorman, Ryder and someone named Fletcher I'm unfamiliar with. The new VO voice is really refreshing though, the old one sucked.
I'm really interested what jocks they have on later in the day. I'm hoping Lisa Miller will be back but I'm not keeping my hopes up.
Trolling and goofing around with the audience like this is at least novel instead of looping the song for 24 hours.
At least playing "1999" makes sense. It was the last song WLOL played in 1991. Would Prince fit on the permanent format? Eh… …For those still curious, they're now playing nothing but... Prince. Which may scare away the listeners who lack a sense of humor. Which is probably quite a few.
I was proven correct. I was also correct days ago when I suggested classic alt & AAA elements might be part of the modified KQRS sound.What KQ is doing right now seems to be a better version of what Baltimore's WZBA did in 2024. (WZBA has since unfortunately reverted to a traditional classic rock sound.)
I am quite impressed by some of the hourly logs on KQRS the past couple days. I strongly suspect what we've been hearing is a preview of the sound that will launch officially tomorrow.