I’m curious if the current tarriff turmoil is hurting mauntaung or getting new advertising. What’s the mood out there?
While I agree with your analysis, I think that the President's chaotic on-again off-again behaviors around these tariffs will have a chilling effect on future advertising campaigns. Businesses of all shapes and sizes need economic stability in order to function efficiently and profitably and Mr. Trump is creating a lot of economic instability with his tariff pronouncements.Not meaningfully, yet. Or at least not enough to tease it apart from longer-term revenue struggles.
I think, for the moment, most businesses are taking a wait and see approach to the US government's tariff policy, because they haven't yet had time to determine the impacts on their cost of revenue or what mitigations they might be able to deploy.
The less free the market, the less advertising. There weren't any radio commercials in the Eastern Bloc. Where the government has picked a winner, either by owning the means of production directly or just by picking a favored option by slapping punitive taxes and regulations on others, there's not as much need to advertise.In my opinion, there's something very socialistic about these tariffs. While the government wouldn't "own" the means of production, the tariffs are in essence determining the means of production. So the mythology of a free market economy is completely destroyed. Companies would be forced, by reaction to the tariffs, to completely change their business model. What we're seeing is that the government wants to have a hand in all private businesses. By doing so, the government deputizes private companies into becoming tax collectors.
How would that effect radio? Advertising is an expense. If companies need to reinvest in different production systems or eat a chunk of profit so the tariff-inducted prices don't kill their business, that leaves less money to buy advertising.
I don't know about radio, but there definitely were TV commercials in the Soviet Union in the 1980s:There weren't any radio commercials in the Eastern Bloc.
Having said that, I'm always baffled by some of the stuff that gets advertised. I saw a TV commercial for water recently - not bottled water, just the water supply. "Makes life flow better." Nobody can choose to go without it, you don't get a choice of which water supply you have at your house, so why?! A better slogan might be "if you don't drink this, you die".
In the 90's, several international broadcasters had radio stations in Russia. Metromedia had stations in Moscow and St. Petersburg.I don't know about radio, but there definitely were TV commercials in the Soviet Union in the 1980s:
In our side of the world, we have Cuba that does not allow any advertising on its 100% state owned electronic media.The less free the market, the less advertising. There weren't any radio commercials in the Eastern Bloc. Where the government has picked a winner, either by owning the means of production directly or just by picking a favored option by slapping punitive taxes and regulations on others, there's not as much need to advertise.
Any of you in the business side of radio who can explain the difference?
The fundamental difference is magnitude. 22% cumulative inflation over 4 or 5 years is very different than import taxes of 20% to 145% on essentially all imported goods, which take effect on a certain date.Any of you in the business side of radio who can explain the difference?
The fear, which again has not yet been realized, is that one of the costs business executives will cut is advertising. Advertising is usually one of the first things cut when consumer sales slow.