Is it your belief that the position you quit wasn't filled? It was. There was someone who needed a job more than you needed it. There always is. Whoever's got that gig now probably makes less than you did and is doing someone else's job besides.
Precisely. If an employer is willing to make compromises that don't overtly cost money, they'll go for the cheaper choice. There's always someone who needs to make the rent.
The message may be getting through to the upcoming generations. I've read multiple articles over the last few years decrying the lack of male TV anchors. Potential candidates can make more money doing something else. So they do.
This also comes across in what you see on TV and hear on radio. The quality has slipped. But "quality" doesn't show up on a P&L.
I couldn't imagine it in 1986, seeing the decline of radio news and being personally affected by it. I'm not setting myself up as a role model here; I'm just describing my own thought processes. I would never encourage anyone to go down the road I went. It was difficult to change to a new career and I was fortunate to have strong family support. My point is that very difficulty is what keeps people stuck with part-time gigs with no benefits.Wow, part time hours, 17.60 an hour, and no benefits. In California, fast food workers start out at $20 hourly. So someone flipping burgers at Jack In The Box, gets paid more than a news editor starting out at iHeart.
Yep, I can't imagine anyone trying to make radio a career in 2025.
My first job in my new career paid reasonably well, came with health insurance (80% covered; 90% for a small monthly extra fee), dental insurance, vision insurance, profit sharing, thrift plans (predecessors to 401(k)s), and other benefits that I never saw in radio. Some benefits have eroded over time, particularly health insurance, but others have gotten better. None of this required a union, by the way. It did require being in a profession where skills were in short supply, granting the ability to walk away from bad job offers. It also helped that I had no dependents. Recently, the labor market for that profession has changed a lot. AI gets the blame but there are other factors that are too off-topic to go into here.
Reliance on a union also depends on state laws and the likelihood of federal support through the NLRB and other agencies. Right now, that likelihood is low, even with the working-class posturing of the MAGA crowd. When it comes time to implement or retain meaningful help for working people, MAGA sells them out. (Exhibit A: Medicaid) At the state level, labor protections vary widely. California is the strongest; Washington is pretty close; Colorado is catching up. But Texas? Oklahoma? Arkansas? Good luck with that. They'd rather legitimize child labor than support workers.
I suspect pay at KTRH was on the low side in the mid-1980s, though higher than other stations in the market. But costs were also low, the health insurance was decent, and I was actually able to save a little money. But I had no student loans to deal with and housing costs required a lower percentage of income than they do now.That wasn't epic money then, but I was 18 years old. It was just enough---51 years ago---for a young man to begin to go out on his own, feed and clothe himself and have an address other than "Blue Ford Mustang, California License 625 NCS".