(I'm putting this in General Radio Topics rather than Missouri or San Francisco because there may be implications for multiple markets.)
Cumulus has filed to extend the silent STA for KLIK(AM) Jefferson City, Missouri, with an exhibit that has some interesting language:
Cumulus Licensing LLC (“Cumulus”), licensee of Station KLIK(AM), Jefferson City,
Missouri, respectfully requests an extension of its silent authority. Cumulus is in the
process of considering proposals by interested parties to purchase stations like this one
that are currently silent. Since there are several Cumulus stations that have filed for silent
authority, it has taken longer than expected to conclude the process.
Emphasis mine. In the same market, Cumulus used the same language to require a silent STA extension for KJMO(FM), Linn, Missouri.
That last sentence in the exhibit is also notable. Would these be possible individual station sales, or sales of groups of stations?
This boilerplate language was used in at least one other instance, judging by the title of the PDFs with both the KLIK exhibit and the KJMO exhibit: "WYMB Silent STA Extension Exhibit.docx". WYMB is in South Carolina. (The PDF title probably comes from the document metadata..."Properties"...that the author overlooked.)
Last week, Cumulus filed an STAextension request for KZAC(AM) San Francisco using somewhat different wording:
Radio License Holdings, LLC (“RLH”), licensee of Station KZAC(AM), San
Francisco, CA, respectfully requests authority to remain silent. RLH is in the process of
selling this station and inadvertently failed to file this STA within the 30 day period and to
file a resumption of service notification after having suspended operations previously in
March 2025. Now that RLH is negotiating a purchase contract, it hopes to clear up its
operation status and resume service in the near future.
Again, emphasis mine. This seems to be more definite about an impending sale than the Missouri language, and the title for this document is simply "Document1". It could indicate that any sale of KZAC is on its own track compared to some of the other silent Cumulus stations. That wouldn't be surprising.
Edit: The KZAC request is for a silent STA, not an extension, since Cumulus indicated that it failed to file a timely STA earlier in the year.
Cumulus has filed to extend the silent STA for KLIK(AM) Jefferson City, Missouri, with an exhibit that has some interesting language:
Cumulus Licensing LLC (“Cumulus”), licensee of Station KLIK(AM), Jefferson City,
Missouri, respectfully requests an extension of its silent authority. Cumulus is in the
process of considering proposals by interested parties to purchase stations like this one
that are currently silent. Since there are several Cumulus stations that have filed for silent
authority, it has taken longer than expected to conclude the process.
Emphasis mine. In the same market, Cumulus used the same language to require a silent STA extension for KJMO(FM), Linn, Missouri.
That last sentence in the exhibit is also notable. Would these be possible individual station sales, or sales of groups of stations?
This boilerplate language was used in at least one other instance, judging by the title of the PDFs with both the KLIK exhibit and the KJMO exhibit: "WYMB Silent STA Extension Exhibit.docx". WYMB is in South Carolina. (The PDF title probably comes from the document metadata..."Properties"...that the author overlooked.)
Last week, Cumulus filed an STA
Radio License Holdings, LLC (“RLH”), licensee of Station KZAC(AM), San
Francisco, CA, respectfully requests authority to remain silent. RLH is in the process of
selling this station and inadvertently failed to file this STA within the 30 day period and to
file a resumption of service notification after having suspended operations previously in
March 2025. Now that RLH is negotiating a purchase contract, it hopes to clear up its
operation status and resume service in the near future.
Again, emphasis mine. This seems to be more definite about an impending sale than the Missouri language, and the title for this document is simply "Document1". It could indicate that any sale of KZAC is on its own track compared to some of the other silent Cumulus stations. That wouldn't be surprising.
Edit: The KZAC request is for a silent STA, not an extension, since Cumulus indicated that it failed to file a timely STA earlier in the year.