• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

That time of year...

It's that time of year, and ARN are swinging the axe.


 
It's that time of year, and ARN are swinging the axe.



I'm assuming that both shows were axed because they weren't capturing more of the audiences the corporate owner wanted? That said, please note the differences between how ARN axes people and how U.S. radio companies axe people:

1) at ARN, the announcements appear to come over a month ahead of time; in the U.S., hosts are often fired on the same day they are given notice often with no regard to the audience the personality may have had.
2) At ARN, these radio personalities will be allowed to stay on and continue doing their shows until December 12 of this year. While I imagine this as being anathema to @davideduardo I actually think that in most cases, this is probably a good policy.

Somehow with the ancient concept of American exceptionalism, many of us in the U.S. have come to believe that we are better than everybody else and that our laisey faire policies make us better than other people in other countries. (Certainly the current WH occupant thinks like that.) But I can't help thinking that we might be better off as a nation if we learned what other countries do, especially those countries that have been long-time U.S. allies with regard to employment in the broadcast industry.
 
I'm assuming that both shows were axed because they weren't capturing more of the audiences the corporate owner wanted? That said, please note the differences between how ARN axes people and how U.S. radio companies axe people:

1) at ARN, the announcements appear to come over a month ahead of time; in the U.S., hosts are often fired on the same day they are given notice often with no regard to the audience the personality may have had.
2) At ARN, these radio personalities will be allowed to stay on and continue doing their shows until December 12 of this year. While I imagine this as being anathema to @davideduardo I actually think that in most cases, this is probably a good policy.

Somehow with the ancient concept of American exceptionalism, many of us in the U.S. have come to believe that we are better than everybody else and that our laisey faire policies make us better than other people in other countries. (Certainly the current WH occupant thinks like that.) But I can't help thinking that we might be better off as a nation if we learned what other countries do, especially those countries that have been long-time U.S. allies with regard to employment in the broadcast industry.
It's unusual in radio. In the UK, where I work now outside of radio I have employment rights - as an employee I have 28 days paid vacation (plus public holidays and Christmas holiday making 42 days off), sick pay, the right not to get told "that was your last day, you're fired" without a full process taking place. As on air talent in radio, unless you have a staff position somewhere like the BBC, you're generally freelance, have none of the above rights, and can get booted out with no notice.

Perhaps the Australians have different rules and you can't have someone showing up to do the same show at the same station for 20 years in a row and then get told "we never actually employed you, you're a freelancer, we want you out, that was your last show". Moves are afoot in the UK to get rid of similar loopholes, which may have interesting consequences for the radio industry.
 
Perhaps the Australians have different rules and you can't have someone showing up to do the same show at the same station for 20 years in a row and then get told "we never actually employed you, you're a freelancer, we want you out, that was your last show". Moves are afoot in the UK to get rid of similar loopholes, which may have interesting consequences for the radio industry.

Which brings me to this story...

Ben and Liam returned home to Adelaide, know they were finishing up, and I guess Nova (Entertainment) caught wind of their next move. The other piece of the puzzle that I don't thing the public actually caught was the station rebrand, to joint the KIIS Network.
 
So, these moves were made by ARN at the start of this week. Dave was with SCA for decades, until his contract wasn’t renewed. Kerri started in radio, before making her career in TV with the 9 Network.


It will be interesting to see how they go, especially Dave, ARN’s metro stations are going through massive changes, and some strategic rethinks…


With trouble in the Nova camp in Brisbane, that will be the market to watch in 2026.
 


Back
Top Bottom