• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Byron Allen gets the Colbert timeslot

No verified public financial evidence has ever been released to prove The Late Show was losing money.
I tend to agree, I haven't seen any documentation using Generally Accepted Accounting Principals that The Late Show was losing money. If such a document exists for an organization to suddenly discover they were losing $40mill a year, wouldn't CBS show a redacted version. Where in the "double hockey sticks" was CBS Management all these years? Now with cost accounting there is "wiggle" room on assignment of costs. How much did The ED Sullivan Theatre cost to run? What is the deprecation of an ancient building that you have owned for a couple of decades? Is it the only show to use it? Who or what is getting changed with the expenses now? Why isn't it listed for sale now? What would have been the on going expense to move the Late Show to the CBS LA studios or somewhere else?

IMHO the real expense was possible future deals that have to be approved by the White House.
 
What would have been the on going expense to move the Late Show to the CBS LA studios or somewhere else?

CBS Television City was sold several years ago.


As we said earlier in this thread, there were a lot of particulars about doing this show that were part of the contract, including the theater and the name.
 
So CBS has no ability to originate live programming from LA? What about the studio they do the Price is Right split the rent! More practical would be a Paramount sound stage.

Once again, the contract for The Late Show included the studio and the name. It was a package. The way out is to not renew. That's what they did.,
 
So CBS has no ability to originate live programming from LA?

They do, at KCBS, but no stages large enough for something like a late-night show.

*They're not live---they usually tape at 5:00 p.m. Eastern/2:00 p.m. Pacific. There's a fair amount of post-production involved.

What about the studio they do the Price is Right split the rent!

The Price is Right moved to Haven Studios in Glendale (ish) three years ago:


More practical would be a Paramount sound stage.

Depends on space availability and what they could get renting it to other producers. If OTA TV is a short-term play for Paramount---if CBS might get spun in a few years---then it's cleaner to have those shows somewhere other than the Paramount lot.
 
CBS doesn’t own TPIR, Fremantle does that show now in Glendale.
And to that point, even if CBS wanted to pay rent, purely hypothetically, part of the reason that studio was attractive for Fremantle (apart from, you know, keeping their profitable game shows on the air) is the ability to have those sets be more permanent that at Television City. Of course they can strike either show's set, but for an outside party, let's say CBS wanting to run a late night show for the sake of this example, that's going to be a costly endeavor to switch back and forth on a regular basis vs. mostly leaving the game shows in place day to day. Wheel and Jeopardy over at Sony would have the same thing. Both sets can stay put. If someone wanted to pay them a truckload of money to cover the costs, ok, sure, maybe there's an arrangement to be made. But it isn't like "going halvsies" in a new space.
 
CBS Television City was sold several years ago.


As we said earlier in this thread, there were a lot of particulars about doing this show that were part of the contract, including the theater and the name.
If you read the WHOLE article it says after 2008 has CBS moved most of their stuff to 40 acre "CBS Studio Center in Studio City. They just got rid of excess space and netted $750 million. BTW they are still doing the Price is Right and a couple of other shows for 5 years. After the dust settles from the Warner deal I bet CBS LA production will end up at the surviving studio.

In fact getting movie "star" guests to promote their movies might be easier in LA than NYC.
 
If you read the WHOLE article it says after 2008 has CBS moved most of their stuff to 40 acre "CBS Studio Center in Studio City.

CBS sold CBS Studio Center (now Radford Studio Center) to Hackman Capital Partners four years ago:


In the past couple of months, Netflix has been in negotiations to buy Radford:

 
If you read the WHOLE article it says after 2008 has CBS moved most of their stuff to 40 acre "CBS Studio Center in Studio City. They just got rid of excess space and netted $750 million. BTW they are still doing the Price is Right and a couple of other shows for 5 years. After the dust settles from the Warner deal I bet CBS LA production will end up at the surviving studio.

In fact getting movie "star" guests to promote their movies might be easier in LA than NYC.
Price (and Let's Make a Deal) are not in a CBS property. They had their years to move and they did. Post pandemic, when Price had reinstalled some socially distant seating in the audience area, they never went back to the full version until moving to Glendale. No need to pay the cost when the studio was going to end up being rehabbed anyway and the only other occupant for a time was Real Time with Bill Mahr.

Also gone is Bold and the Beautiful which found a new home somewhere or another. Don't recall where, but they moved out.
 
With places like Georgia trying to get movies from LA, and Computer Graphics in movies there will be unused space somewhere in LA.

But back to the original thread subject, where is the the accounting that shows $40 million a year loses?

I don't trust press releases for financial information. World Com was doing "great" until they had to publish their restated P & L.
 
With places like Georgia trying to get movies from LA, and Computer Graphics in movies there will be unused space somewhere in LA.

But back to the original thread subject, where is the the accounting that shows $40 million a year loses?

I don't trust press releases for financial information. World Com was doing "great" until they had to publish their restated P & L.
The source for the accounting is "Trust me, bruh, and it has nothing to do with this deal we just happened to get an important approval on right at the same time."

As for late night, what would be the point of CBS starting up a new franchise anytime soon? They should always keep their eyes open and evaluate opportunities, that's just a part of business. But due diligence aside, you burned every last bit of goodwill to the ground. You can't use the Late Show franchise. What's the play here? Selling the time to Byron Allen for a year or more solves the issue of your own making. Figuratively speaking, their potential audience for a traditional late-night program in the wake of axing Colbert is zero. Someone could hand them a studio with space to do it, and it doesn't make a difference. That bridge is burned to a crisp. If they pursue something down the road, a "Sort of Late Show" isn't going to cut it.
 


Back
Top Bottom