• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Weekend trip to southern California

Over the weekend, I took a road trip to southern California, particularly the Riverside and Long Beach areas. I took a portable radio that had some issues with me and I used it at the two destinations and during the return trip. Here is some of what I found and didn't find.

The best surprise for me was Quartzsite's KCNl (105.9 mHz). Driving on I-10 east, I was able to receive the station from just east of Desert Center, CA, to just east of the COL of Quartzsite (AZ) with hardly any issues. The station no longer has a website and it doesn't stream, but its programming was quite good, at least to my taste. KCNL plays classic rock/hits from the 1960s ("The Wind Cries Mary," by the Jimi Hendrix Experience) to the 1990s. While the programming is automated, it didn't appear to be satellite-based. While the station is a commercial operation, I heard only one actual commercial during my time of listening (and I was switching around the dial to see what else I could hear so I could have missed some) and that was an advertisement for a local hardware store located in Blythe, CA.

The owner of KCNl also owns KBUX at 96.5 mHz. The station used to be at 94.3 mHz but moved to allow Salome, AZ to get a commercial radio station at 94.1 mHz (whose construction permit was cancelled a while back if memory serves). Anyway, the Quartzsite-licensed noncommercial outlet is currently programming automated oldies (not from satellite) and is playing some real forgotten tunes (I heard The Olympics' minor 1960 hit, "Big Boy Pete," while listening to this station). Unfortunately, KBUX doesn't currently have a website, has never streamed, and I was only able to hear the station for about 10 minutes from the east side of Quartzsite going southeast on I-10.

Quartzsite has two other stations licensed to it: public radio outlet KAWQ (simulcasting Yuma's NPR outlet, KAWC) at 90.1 mHz and KYLN at 91.3 mHz which simulcasts the religious programming of Lake Havasu City-based KNLB. Both radio stations could be heard in both Quartzsite and Blythe well (as well as in Ripley, west of Blythe), but both had some terrain blocking (by low mountains) between Blythe and Quartzsite.

In Blythe itself, all three of its licensed radio stations are still broadcasting with the same formats as they had when I last traveled through there (though I should point out that KBJF at 97.3 mHz was not yet on the air when I traveled through last). The strongest of the three is still noncommercial KERU (88.5 mHz) which carries the Fresno-based Radio Bilingua feed. KJMB at 100.7 mHz is running a soft AC format whose signal can be heard up to about 20 miles west of Blythe and 15 miles east of Blythe. While the station does make it to Quartzsite, AZ, it does so with a lot of hiss.

KBJF at 97.3 mHz is both the newest and weakest of the Blythe-licensed stations as its signal covers from about 3 miles west of Blythe to about 3 miles east of Blythe. As I was keeping an eye on these stations during my Sunday return trip, I heard neither commercials nor PSAs on either one.

Though I didn't travel through either Parker or Lake Havasu City, AZ, or Big River, CA, I did hear a couple of outlets from those locations. KFLG-FM came in off and on from just east of Desert Center (right around the rest area) to just east of Quartzsite, and I could hear Parker's KPKR with its adult hits format at 95.7 mHz in Quartzsite.

One station I was unable to hear (though I wanted to for verification) was KLPZ-FM (90.7 mHz) licensed as a non-commercial outlet to Salome, AZ. It's owned by New Path Communications, and I'm guessing that the format is protestant religious, but the station currently has no website or stream to verify my suspicion.

In Palm Springs, CA, both KKGX (920 kHz) and KWXY (1340 kHz) are back on the air. KKGX was carrying BBC programming, including a notice that occurs every 30 minutes that that programming comes courtesy of PRI. I haven't seen KKGX listed as a non-commercial station but perhaps it has become that.

KWXY (1340 kHz) dropped its easy listening format a while back and is now programming automated rock/classic rock on that frequency. It's anybody's guess how long that one will last. The licenses at 1010, 1200, 1400, and 1450 kHz are silent and are currently listed as either cancelled or with STAs, and I'm guessing that none of these stations will come back.

The Los Angeles and San Bernardino/Riverside stations were what I expected to hear. It's too bad that even 1960s oldies are unable to be commercially viable in either of these markets but time marches on. I did hear an unidentified outlet on 88.7 mHz while we stayed in San Pedro on Saturday broadcasting Spanish talk. (I thought/think it was Spanish religious but I never heard the Spanish words Dios (God) or Cristo (Christ) uttered during the brief times I listened to it.)

Anyway, those are some of my radio observations of my weekend road trip to southern California.
 
I thought KJMB was on 100.3 in Blythe. They have a website, mentioning independently owned and operated since 1981. Is the station satellite-fed or local? There is no webstream.
 
I thought KJMB was on 100.3 in Blythe. They have a website, mentioning independently owned and operated since 1981. Is the station satellite-fed or local? There is no webstream.

You are correct about KJMB's frequency. Though I went through my writing before I posted, I missed that glaring error. There is a website for KJMB (correct), and you are correct that it doesn't stream. When I was listening, I heard no station breaks, leading me to believe that the satellite programming I heard in the past on the station may have been dropped.

Interesting about the date of first airing. Wikipedia also lists the station's first air date as 1981. However, the first time I heard a station at 100.3 licensed to Blythe was on my Thanksgiving 1976 trip to the Glamis Sand Dunes. The callsign then was KYOR-FM, and the format was automated easy listening (or beautiful) music.
 
Sounds like ya had fun!

I reckon both AM and FM dial is loaded like crazy there!!

Depends on where the "there" is that you are referring to. Both Los Angeles and San Bernardino had all of the AM frequencies operating that I first heard back in the early 1970s (with the move-in from Big Bear that occurred, if memory serves, in the early 2000s). Riverside did lose one of its two radio outlets (1570 KPRO) during the first decade of the 2000s, and Palm Springs/Indio, as mentioned in my original post, has lost four AM stations thus far to date. Blythe lost its only AM, KYOR at 1450 kHz, during the 1980s, and Parker lost its only AM outlet (KLPZ at 1380 kHz) during the last decade. And the 560 kHz station I would have heard from Yuma, AZ, KBLU, went silent last year (though this one may be coming back per @SomeRadioGuy on another thread).
 
Depends on where the "there" is that you are referring to. Both Los Angeles and San Bernardino had all of the AM frequencies operating that I first heard back in the early 1970s (with the move-in from Big Bear that occurred, if memory serves, in the early 2000s). Riverside did lose one of its two radio outlets (1570 KPRO) during the first decade of the 2000s, and Palm Springs/Indio, as mentioned in my original post, has lost four AM stations thus far to date. Blythe lost its only AM, KYOR at 1450 kHz, during the 1980s, and Parker lost its only AM outlet (KLPZ at 1380 kHz) during the last decade. And the 560 kHz station I would have heard from Yuma, AZ, KBLU, went silent last year (though this one may be coming back per @SomeRadioGuy on another thread).

Yup, it was sold and if the equipment sold with the station is accurate, they have to go back on the air with, but they already have a studio at the buyers office thats been used for web only broadcasts. i recall the tower rent was exorbinant....... )went back in LMS to look...... nearly $3000 a month
 
You are correct about KJMB's frequency. Though I went through my writing before I posted, I missed that glaring error. There is a website for KJMB (correct), and you are correct that it doesn't stream. When I was listening, I heard no station breaks, leading me to believe that the satellite programming I heard in the past on the station may have been dropped.

Interesting about the date of first airing. Wikipedia also lists the station's first air date as 1981. However, the first time I heard a station at 100.3 licensed to Blythe was on my Thanksgiving 1976 trip to the Glamis Sand Dunes. The callsign then was KYOR-FM, and the format was automated easy listening (or beautiful) music.

100.3 in Blythe appeared to have signed on in early 1975, according to the FCC history cards: https://cdbs.recnet.com/corres/?doc=72385

At that time, it appears that it broadcast from a tower near the current location of this tower: FCCInfo Structure Registration Results

KJMB appeared to move to their current site around 1987.

Also, 97.3 is KBHJ and signed on back in 2017. Its original CP had it permitted to broadcast from the same tower that KERU and KCNL broadcast from, but downgraded to a short tower in Blythe before signing on.
 
100.3 in Blythe appeared to have signed on in early 1975, according to the FCC history cards: https://cdbs.recnet.com/corres/?doc=72385

At that time, it appears that it broadcast from a tower near the current location of this tower: FCCInfo Structure Registration Results

KJMB appeared to move to their current site around 1987.

Also, 97.3 is KBHJ and signed on back in 2017. Its original CP had it permitted to broadcast from the same tower that KERU and KCNL broadcast from, but downgraded to a short tower in Blythe before signing on.

Thanks for the corrections. Since my family traveled annually to Glamis every Thanksgiving weekend between 1972 and 1977 and since I always took a radio along, it must have been on the 1975 trip when I first heard KYOR-FM. (Memories due become sketchy in old age.)

I'm now wondering why KBHJ opted for the shorter tower. 97.3 before KBHJ's license had been the frequency for KPKR, and I assumed that after KPKR moved to 95.7 mHz that to be licensed to Blythe, KBHJ had to cut power in order to comply with the wishes of Mexican authorities. (It's my understanding that new U.S. radio licenses within 120 miles of the Mexican border have to get clearances from both the U.S. and Mexican governments before they can go on the air--but I'm definitely willing to be corrected on that.)
 
Interesting about the date of first airing. Wikipedia also lists the station's first air date as 1981.

Ted, I am surprised that you don't know by now that Wikipedia information needs to be verified by outside sources. @ftballfan proves this by his correction of the post I partially quoted.

Wikipedia is a social experiment gone awry. The egalitarian concept of "the encyclopedia anyone can edit" has resulted in a lot of misinformation all over the spectrum of its pages. I think their founders failed to contemplate the fact that there are people out here in cyberspace who will post "facts" based on their own faulty memories. That Wikipedia still fails to require citable sources for entries in the Infobox is beyond my comprehension.

It is fairly common knowledge that I began my broadcast career at age 12, working for the ill-fated KKOG-TV in Ventura CA for the entire nine months of its existence. (In fact, until its founder/owner Julian Myers passed away in December 2013, he and I were the only two people who had been there on both its first and last days on the air.) I once spent an entire half-hour removing all kinds of erroneous entries on poor channel 16's page, including a long, fanciful set of paragraphs from someone who posted their own "history" of what the station "would have done" if it had lasted past September 1969.

So ... don't take Wikipedia at face value. For anything broadcast related, there are plenty of resources available to confirm or deny information posted there, especially @davideduardo's World Radio History and @Michi's FCCData.
 
Thanks for the corrections. Since my family traveled annually to Glamis every Thanksgiving weekend between 1972 and 1977 and since I always took a radio along, it must have been on the 1975 trip when I first heard KYOR-FM. (Memories due become sketchy in old age.)

I've wondered why KBHJ
Ted, I am surprised that you don't know by now that Wikipedia information needs to be verified by outside sources. @ftballfan proves this by his correction of the post I partially quoted.

Wikipedia is a social experiment gone awry. The egalitarian concept of "the encyclopedia anyone can edit" has resulted in a lot of misinformation all over the spectrum of its pages. I think their founders failed to contemplate the fact that there are people out here in cyberspace who will post "facts" based on their own faulty memories. That Wikipedia still fails to require citable sources for entries in the Infobox is beyond my comprehension.

It is fairly common knowledge that I began my broadcast career at age 12, working for the ill-fated KKOG-TV in Ventura CA for the entire nine months of its existence. (In fact, until its founder/owner Julian Myers passed away in December 2013, he and I were the only two people who had been there on both its first and last days on the air.) I once spent an entire half-hour removing all kinds of erroneous entries on poor channel 16's page, including a long, fanciful set of paragraphs from someone who posted their own "history" of what the station "would have done" if it had lasted past September 1969.

So ... don't take Wikipedia at face value. For anything broadcast related, there are plenty of resources available to confirm or deny information posted there, especially @davideduardo's World Radio History and @Michi's FCCData.

While I am sure you mean well, I should point out to you that for me, accessibility (that is to screenreading software used by the blind and visually impaired) has to trump everything else when I look up information. Sadly, the sites you mention have a lot more accessibility issues than Wikipedia does. So, until such time as those issues are solved, I will continue to rely on Wikipedia, knowing full well of the issues you've laid out surrounding some of its entries.
 
While I am sure you mean well, I should point out to you that for me, accessibility (that is to screenreading software used by the blind and visually impaired) has to trump everything else when I look up information. Sadly, the sites you mention have a lot more accessibility issues than Wikipedia does. So, until such time as those issues are solved, I will continue to rely on Wikipedia, knowing full well of the issues you've laid out surrounding some of its entries.

Not being visually impaired, I have no first hand knowledge of that, Ted, so I accept your statement as being "expert by experience". And I have to now wonder why that software apparently can't handle PDFs (which I surmise is a problem for you in using World Radio History).

I'm not sure why Michi's site would be problematic, other than the signal maps, which I presume would be a problem for you on any such site.
 
Not being visually impaired, I have no first hand knowledge of that, Ted, so I accept your statement as being "expert by experience". And I have to now wonder why that software apparently can't handle PDFs (which I surmise is a problem for you in using World Radio History).

I'm not sure why Michi's site would be problematic, other than the signal maps, which I presume would be a problem for you on any such site.

@Michi's site, the last time I checked it, had a lot of graphics that were improperly labeled for screenreader usage, making it more difficult to find information on it. As to .pdfs, as I understand it, the default setting is for the information you're putting into it to be copied as a picture of the page you are trying to enter. Screenreaders in and of themselves are unable to read text information that is inside of a picture. With AI, in some cases, you can get the screenreader to sometimes interpret what is inside the picture, but that tends to take a little longer and, at least for the moment, the results of what is being read can be less trustworthy than reading a Wikipedia page.

You know, it's one thing to be an outlier with regard to over-the-air music radio--you have Internet options or you can (as I did over many decades) purchase the music you like on CD or album. Being an outlier because of a disability to website information raises much thornier issues. Businesses don't really want to serve you because there are too few (in terms of percentages of the country's entire population) to make it worthwhile. So those with visual impairments like myself work to get laws passed to force business compliance only to see businesses fight back against us in courts and in the halls of state and federal legislatures--topics that would not (normally) be covered on this Board. So what can I do but to go where it appears the sites are accessible and hope for the best.
 


Back
Top Bottom