It's easy to avoid if you simply keep using what works. For example, I still use Office 2003 because it does everything I need.AI-generated software is getting pretty hard to avoid if you use a computer, however.
It's easy to avoid if you simply keep using what works. For example, I still use Office 2003 because it does everything I need.AI-generated software is getting pretty hard to avoid if you use a computer, however.
Absolutely!It's easy to avoid if you simply keep using what works. For example, I still use Office 2003 because it does everything I need.
For whatever it's worth: I block Youtube's embed JavaScript in my browser. One side-effect is that Youtube thumbnails don't appear in those embeds, only direct links. Had I known that video had a slop thumbnail, I'd have included a clarification assuring the video itself was real.I never click on a video that has an obviously AI-generated thumbnail. If they can't be bothered to make a real thumbnail for it, I can't be bothered to watch it. Plus, I don't feel like gambling on whether or not the entire video will be AI-generated slop.
I know the guy, I'll ask him. My guess is that he used one of those tools that offers to generate an AI thumbnail for you when you upload a video.And now that I'm looking at it, @Mediafrog+ is correct that the model in the video is the same as what's in the slop thumbnail (black face). I have no idea why the uploader decided to generate it with his Slopomatic '76 when he could have just photographed the actual radio. Maybe he was after the dramatic lighting effects.
They are killing off some of the smaller ones where Radio 5 is the only station left. The sites used to be shared, but one by one the other AM stations have gone, and the resource required to broadcast just Radio 5 on AM to a town of say, 50,000 where most people are listening on DAB isn't worth it.I saw a recent post on another forum that Radio 5 is already in the process of turning off its remaining mediumwave transmitters.
radiotoday.co.uk
With the closure of 198, was there any publicity in the UK relating to the end of the TeleSwitch data service that was transmitted on the longwave signal?They are killing off some of the smaller ones where Radio 5 is the only station left. The sites used to be shared, but one by one the other AM stations have gone, and the resource required to broadcast just Radio 5 on AM to a town of say, 50,000 where most people are listening on DAB isn't worth it.
I’ve been reading and hearing a lot of stories about the UK housing shortage, so I would think the pressure to redevelop land will only increase.We also have the same issue as the U.S. where the land is worth more as a development site for residential or business than as a radio station. Both the sites that are closing this month are on the edge of towns with housing developments butting right up against them, and will have houses on them as soon as the towers come down.
As I understand it, 198 was kept around longer than the BBC really wanted it to be kept around, purely because of the electricity metering stuff on the signal. The electricity companies were the ones paying for it for the past few years, not the BBC.With the closure of 198, was there any publicity in the UK relating to the end of the TeleSwitch data service that was transmitted on the longwave signal?
They can't build them fast enough, it's crazy. My town is encircled on three sides by brand new housing developments and it still isn't touching the sides of what's needed. It's not just the UK - the Netherlands is in a worse situation, I was there last month and the whole place looks like a giant apartment construction site, there are whole new cities going up in places like Almere Poort, and still they have a housing crisis. Ireland is the same, to the extent that radio is full of angry songs literally about the housing crisis like this one.I’ve been reading and hearing a lot of stories about the UK housing shortage, so I would think the pressure to redevelop land will only increase.
Is the new housing built in a cheap/slipshod way there or does it depend on the housebuilder/area? An ex bought a townhouse that was only a few years old and it was very drafty around the windows. A handyman took off the window casings and found out the drafts were because the builder hadn't caulked/foamed around the window frames!As I understand it, 198 was kept around longer than the BBC really wanted it to be kept around, purely because of the electricity metering stuff on the signal. The electricity companies were the ones paying for it for the past few years, not the BBC.
I'm not up on the detail, but I read that the requirement for it from the electricity companies has now ended as they have spent the past few years going around replacing all the old meters with 4G-connected "smart" ones, which is why it got shut off when it did, rather than being driven by the BBC.
They can't build them fast enough, it's crazy. My town is encircled on three sides by brand new housing developments and it still isn't touching the sides of what's needed. It's not just the UK - the Netherlands is in a worse situation, I was there last month and the whole place looks like a giant apartment construction site, there are whole new cities going up in places like Almere Poort, and still they have a housing crisis. Ireland is the same, to the extent that radio is full of angry songs literally about the housing crisis like this one.
Back in the UK, I was lucky to grab a property in need of some redecoration for about $225k, but that's considered crazy low. They were short sighted through the late 20th and early 21st century in terms of not building the amount of housing needed for a growing population and structural changes like more one-person households, and now Europe is playing catch-up while the U.S. pretty much kept building throughout.
New houses tend to have minor faults and snags, but I'm not overly familiar with it because my house is from 1934 and I've never lived in a brand new one.Is the new housing built in a cheap/slipshod way there or does it depend on the housebuilder/area? An ex bought a townhouse that was only a few years old and it was very drafty around the windows. A handyman took off the window casings and found out the drafts were because the builder hadn't caulked/foamed around the window frames!
Neither have I. That is terrible about the Mica scandal, thanks for the link.New houses tend to have minor faults and snags, but I'm not overly familiar with it because my house is from 1934 and I've never lived in a brand new one.
Nothing as bad as the "Mica scandal" in Ireland:
![]()
‘Blocks like Weetabix:’ how mica scandal upended lives in Ireland
Residents living in buildings that have to be demolished due to defective blocks describe anguishwww.theguardian.com
Longwave has incredible groundwave coverage during the day, often 1,000 miles or more depending on transmitter power. It was great for fill-in coverage where mediumwave and FM didn’t reach.Its sad they are doing away with those low band freqs,I think ther are awesome to be honest!
I’ve seen reports that 251 kHz “AM” in Amarillo still has spoken weather reports, but most of those are now gone. GLS 206 in Galveston, Texas and GNI 236 in Grand Isle, Louisiana were two more powerful examples and widely heard decades ago, but both also long gone. I recall being able to hear GLS in Amarillo in the middle of the day, some 600 miles away in the early 1980s.Are there still any dual-purpose beacon/aero weather stations left on longwave in North America? Back in the last millennium, I remember hearing "TUK" in Nantucket, MA, and "LQ" in Lynn, MA, transmitting spoken weather reports and forecasts over the steady repetition of their identifiers in Morse 24/7. Neither has been doing that for many years now. What's going on elsewhere?
I think LQ operated on 382 kHz and TUK on 193.
The list shows LQ now assigned to a beacon in Springfield, IL, while TUK is no longer on the air. I also see that "MMK" Meriden, CT, and "OX," Oxford, CT, the nearest beacons to me when I lived in Connecticut, are not on the list either.I’ve seen reports that 251 kHz “AM” in Amarillo still has spoken weather reports, but most of those are now gone. GLS 206 in Galveston, Texas and GNI 236 in Grand Isle, Louisiana were two more powerful examples and widely heard decades ago, but both also long gone. I recall being able to hear GLS in Amarillo in the middle of the day, some 600 miles away in the early 1980s.
TUK was on 194 kHz.
Current longwave beacons:
McGRath, Alaska doesnt have a combo, but just the usual NDB, VTR on 350.... but it has the distinction of being fairly high powered at 1kw and uses an NVIS antenna. It will eventually go away as its broken down a few times and parts are becoming unobtanium.Are there still any dual-purpose beacon/aero weather stations left on longwave in North America? Back in the last millennium, I remember hearing "TUK" in Nantucket, MA, and "LQ" in Lynn, MA, transmitting spoken weather reports and forecasts over the steady repetition of their identifiers in Morse 24/7. Neither has been doing that for many years now. What's going on elsewhere?
I think LQ operated on 382 kHz and TUK on 193.
