• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

The Trump Administration rants about ABC News And NBC, Says They Should Lose FCC Licenses

Here is the letter former ABC News staff has written in protest of the FCC going after Kimmel and the View.


Last fall, we called on Disney and ABC News to stand up for its journalists, and to resist government pressure to silence voices critical of the Trump administration. This came after Disney pulled talk show host Jimmy Kimmel off the air briefly under threats from the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission. Today, we write to commend Disney and ABC forthe strong stand they are now taking in support of freedom of speech.ABC rightfully argues that the Trump administration is violating its free speech rights and creating a “chilling effect” on First Amendment-protected speech through its regulatory action targeting The View. In its filing with the FCC, ABC argues the FCC has questioned talk shows critical of the president but not those conservative radio talk shows that have featured content supportive of the administration - making plain that this is political retaliation, not regulatory enforcement As ABC's filing notes, with the 2026 midterm elections approaching, Americans need more access to political news, not less.
 

Attachments

  • Statement-of-Support-for-ABC.pdf
    662.1 KB · Views: 0

Here is more on the Disney/FCC issue.


UPDATED: The Walt Disney Co. and ABC are once again pushing back on the FCC, this time over the agency’s demand that it file early renewal applications for its broadcast licenses, a move that the company calls a threat to the First Amendment.

“It is an extraordinary demonstration of power and coercion directed at disfavored editorial voices which sends a clear warning to every broadcaster in America,” the company said in a filing with the agency on Thursday, along with its renewal applications for eight of its stations. “This is a threat to the First Amendment that this Commission and this proceeding must not be permitted to normalize.”
 
Carr keeps insisting this ABC license renewal thing is about DEI. However we should point out that DEI isn't illegal.

Regulations based on executive orders are unconstitutional, because the president doesn't make the law.

 
Carr keeps insisting this ABC license renewal thing is about DEI. However we should point out that DEI isn't illegal.

Regulations based on executive orders are unconstitutional, because the president doesn't make the law.

True we keep running into stuff about the FCC going after Jimmy Kimmel and the View. Yes in each case it’s about the first amendment issue. But they devolved into whatever Trump was offended with at that time.
 
On Thursday, the FCC issued a statement reminding broadcasters of their "public interest obligations:



In it, they say that broadcasters have an obligation to "fairly and impartially inform the public."

That calls into question hundreds of conservative talk radio stations that are anything but impartial in the way they talk about controversial issues.
 
On Thursday, the FCC issued a statement reminding broadcasters of their "public interest obligations:



In it, they say that broadcasters have an obligation to "fairly and impartially inform the public."

That calls into question hundreds of conservative talk radio stations that are anything but impartial in the way they talk about controversial issues.

The only groups this FCC is going to go after on this redefinition are groups that publish or air anything critical of President Trump. The idea of required public service for radio stations is actually a good one but *only* if that requirement applys the same all the way across the board, and Mr. Trump, as he does in other areas, prefers to play favorites!
 
The only groups this FCC is going to go after on this redefinition are groups that publish or air anything critical of President Trump.

Then when that happens, those stations need to have examples of how conservative talk radio stations are doing the same thing. These cases need to be taken out of regulatory agencies and moved to the courts. The courts have already ruled that agencies can't operate as though they're courts.
 
On Thursday, the FCC issued a statement reminding broadcasters of their "public interest obligations:

From the linked article:

“No broadcaster has a ‘right’ to use the public spectrum,” the notice says, adding that denial of a license because “the public interest” requires it “is not a denial of free speech.”

When you grant a broadcaster a license, that gives them a right to use the public airwaves. By definition, that's what a license is. The foundation of the American system of broadcasting is that the government grants licenses, which give broadcasters a right to use the airwaves.

This commission is using the vague words of "the public interest" to act as judge & jury in order to deny free speech. The supreme court ruled in the Chevron case that regulatory agencies can't do this.
 
From the linked article:



When you grant a broadcaster a license, that gives them a right to use the public airwaves. By definition, that's what a license is. The foundation of the American system of broadcasting is that the government grants licenses, which give broadcasters a right to use the airwaves.

This commission is using the vague words of "the public interest" to act as judge & jury in order to deny free speech. The supreme court ruled in the Chevron case that regulatory agencies can't do this.
Are satellite transponders public airwaves? Could they go after cable as well.
 
A recent supreme court decision limits some of the FCC's power regarding the penalties it can impose. The decision says that there needs to be a jury trial if any penalties are imposed. So the commission itself can't take away licenses for example.


This gets back to their Chevron decision regarding the power of regulatory agencies.
 
Carr keeps insisting this ABC license renewal thing is about DEI. However we should point out that DEI isn't illegal.

Regulations based on executive orders are unconstitutional, because the president doesn't make the law.

And matters of law and the Constitution have mattered so far? Other than tariffs, and that of as much about businesse$$ as any trivial matter of law, SCOTUS has twisted the Constitution and precedent like a pretzel to support almost everything the regime desires.
 


Back
Top Bottom