But robots and automated technologies have always replaced humans doing repetitious assembly jobs, or tasks that can be done by much smaller or less expensive devices. A good quality cart machine used to set a station back between two and six thousand dollars. Stations would have typically at least six of those machines. Now you can buy a workstation that can play all your station audio for less than a thousand bucks, plus literally walk away while it does the work for you. That workstation isn't AI. It's jusy a PC with a sound card that plays a list of audio clips. Oh, and you don't need to buy expensive tape cartridges or clean tape heads every couple days. No tape hiss introduced by tape carts either.^^^^ You make some good points, but when I read in the news articles periodically about AI eventually eliminating about half the jobs in the US economy, over the next couple decades possibly, I would hazard a guess that your broadcast media conglomerates would be definitely on that bandwagon.
My example above replaced board ops, in-person airstaff, or having to staff 24/7. Again; not even close to being AI. It's an inexpensive replacement for what used to be expensive and elaborate separate devices which usually required a lot of human intervention.It's not like technology hasn't eliminated / replaced radio and broadcast jobs before. Even here on RD, the experts have admitted that tech eliminated radio jobs over the years.
Again; a series of sounds produced by an electronic device does not make it intelligent. No more than the aforementioned PC playing a series of songs, commercials, promos, jingles etc. from a list created by a human is AI. A human speaking (producing sounds), produced by a brain means the sounds are created by an (assumed) form of intelligence.AI is tech. And the definition of "AI" has also altered from the specific one you have been using. After all, what is 'intelligence'? Is a spider, which exhibits less brain power than a laptop computer, 'intelligent'?
There is no motivation for radio stations to have a computer use information scraped from social media to drive a digital speech sound generator transmitted over radio. The station loses control over how their station is being presented. Now if a station decided to use a modern version of a digitalker chip to play back liners over the radio, that's not intelligence either. It's playing a sound file, just as when a thousand dollar PC plays a sound file.
If you want to call synthesized voice as technology, I would agree with that label. It's simply not a form of AI technology.