jas2525 said:Bob Grant at EIGHTY would do better locally than Hannity is doing now. Guaranteed.
Not an option. And he's 82.
jas2525 said:Bob Grant at EIGHTY would do better locally than Hannity is doing now. Guaranteed.
TheBigA said:jas2525 said:Bob Grant at EIGHTY would do better locally than Hannity is doing now. Guaranteed.
Not an option. And he's 82.
jas2525 said:Fact is, WABC has the ability to get who they want and sign them contractually in a way that precludes any syndication---and if you think, especially with all the talent on the beach, that they couldn't get soembody solid who's willing to JUST be local in NYC and take less than a mil in salary, you're being naive...or maybe just characteristically contrarian.
TheBigA said:jas2525 said:Fact is, WABC has the ability to get who they want and sign them contractually in a way that precludes any syndication---and if you think, especially with all the talent on the beach, that they couldn't get soembody solid who's willing to JUST be local in NYC and take less than a mil in salary, you're being naive...or maybe just characteristically contrarian.
No, I'm being realistic. The goal in radio is to make money. They're doing that now. No need to change.
TheBigA said:radioguy39nj said:Malzberg on WOR beats Hannity in PM Drive. He's not 100% local, but he's on far fewer stations than Hannity. This allows Malzberg to be a bit more "local" since he doesn't have to tailor himself for an audience in middle America.![]()
Malzberg is under contract to WOR. They aren't giving him up. Who could WABC hire that would beat him? For less money than Hannity?
The other side of the coin is WABC gives up Hannity, and they will have to compete against him AND Malzberg.
radioguy39nj said:Rush and Sean are not under contract to WABC.
jas2525 said:If that's the way radio is to be, than radio deserves to lose audience to other media. There's nothing about that station that will attract or breed loyalty in any locals at this point. Unlike the last decade, there is nothing special about WABC any longer.
jas2525 said:Like I said, it's a rotten shame that the most recognized call letters in the biz has programming far less unique and local than stations that used to not be able to hold a candle to it.
Unlike the last decade, there is nothing special about WABC any longer.
TheBigA said:jas2525 said:If that's the way radio is to be, than radio deserves to lose audience to other media. There's nothing about that station that will attract or breed loyalty in any locals at this point. Unlike the last decade, there is nothing special about WABC any longer.
Just like to point out that over a million people disagree. This station is just 1/10th of a point behind WCBS and WINS in the ratings.
And if radio is losing audience to other media, it's not because they have local talk. You're not going to hear local talk on Pandora or an iPod.
jas2525 said:The audience (and cume) that was built over the years while they were relating directly to and reflecting NYC, will gradually evaporate due to attrition. There will be very few "new" listeners to that station.
jas2525 said:It shouldn't surprise anyone that they still have a massive cume. Heritage does that for you. But how long can you hold on to them? The point is they have done and could be doing a lot better, but they have painted themselves into a corner that for now, doesn't seem like a big deal, but in 10 years most assuredly will be.
The audience (and cume) that was built over the years while they were relating directly to and reflecting NYC, will gradually evaporate due to attrition. There will be very few "new" listeners to that station.
As I said, there is no longer anything special or unique about a once-great talk station.
jas2525 said:And pinning the 2.2 of WPHT on their latest changes is ridiculous and you know it.
OhioMediaWatch said:Both Rush and Hannity started with local WABC shows.
Oh, sure, we all knew about Sean's stint as a local PM driver on WABC until syndication, but Rush also had a (separate) local show when he started on WABC in the summer of 1988.
It was by design, not because WABC wanted a local show out of him...but because his contract at KFBK specified he could only end the deal if he got a show in a top 10 market.
Since it said nothing about syndication, WABC gave him an extra hour or two of local talk, which didn't last long...eventually, only his syndicated show aired.
radioguy39nj said:Rush's local show on WABC must've been so short-lived I don't even remember it!
...it took some contractual maneuvering to bring that about (and it would not have happened if I had not secured a clause in my contract saying I could leave for an offer in the top-ten market). So the deal was put together that I would go to network and do a local show from 10 a.m. to 12 noon. I would not be paid for that show, but WABC would run our national commercials so that we could tell our advertisers we were in the number-one market.
Sponsors didn't really care. They just wanted their spots to air in a number-one market. I then did a national show from noon to 2 p.m.