• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

101.1 filings

Checking up on 101.1 related filings via the FCC website:

License to modify:
BMLED-20100716ABW 302-FM 07/19/2010 Info | Application
Listed is a Petition to Deny Filed 08/30/2010 by The Ohio State University

Voluntary Assignment of License:
BALH-20100630BQB 314 07/02/2010 Info | Application
Listed are Informal Objection Filed 08/10/2010 by Robert W. Harmon, Opposition Filed 08/26/2010 by THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, Reply Filed 09/09/2010 by Robert W. Harmon
 
teched said:
Checking up on 101.1 related filings via the FCC website:

License to modify:
BMLED-20100716ABW 302-FM 07/19/2010 Info | Application
Listed is a Petition to Deny Filed 08/30/2010 by The Ohio State University

Voluntary Assignment of License:
BALH-20100630BQB 314 07/02/2010 Info | Application
Listed are Informal Objection Filed 08/10/2010 by Robert W. Harmon, Opposition Filed 08/26/2010 by THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, Reply Filed 09/09/2010 by Robert W. Harmon

Any idea why Robert is fighting their proposal?
 
teched said:
License to modify:
BMLED-20100716ABW 302-FM 07/19/2010 Info | Application
Listed is a Petition to Deny Filed 08/30/2010 by The Ohio State University


OSU is the party applying for this action and OSU is the one filing a petition to deny. Am I reading this correctly or do I need to get some more sleep?
 
C414B said:
teched said:
License to modify:
BMLED-20100716ABW 302-FM 07/19/2010 Info | Application
Listed is a Petition to Deny Filed 08/30/2010 by The Ohio State University

I think you nailed it. And now I'm puzzled on why OSU filed a petition to deny ???


OSU is the party applying for this action and OSU is the one filing a petition to deny. Am I reading this correctly or do I need to get some more sleep?
 
allstar2003 said:
I think you nailed it. And now I'm puzzled on why OSU filed a petition to deny ???

OK. Glad to see I'm not the only one confused about this....
 
Mr. Harmon filed an objection
Ohio State filed an opposition to Mr. Harmon
Mr. Harmon filed a reply

Mr. Harmon's objection will only delay the aquisition by few months.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom