I wasn't aware that the school board had any connection to the content. How many station employees are paid by the school board?
Well supposedly that's what the former board chair was trying to argue. That they wanted more control of the content and that was first amendment violation and something something Trump.
I read what the Board wanted more as "Hey, if this ends up being owned by us, we don't want it to be completely detached from our main brand." The agreement seems to suggest the school board will have more seats on the SFPMG board and more supervisory power, no doubt to make sure this doesn't happen again.
From the document:
The agreement outlines SFPMG’s broad operational responsibilities, including programming, staffing, fundraising, compliance, and day-to-day management, while preserving the School Board’s authority as FCC licensee and its
right to oversee and engage in key decisions. The agreement requires that all funds, endowments, donor lists, and revenues, including those tied to the Educational Broadband Service License WHR-866 trust and used solely for the benefit of the stations, with strict accounting, audit, and transparency obligations.
The Amended Management and Program Service Agreement imposes non-compete restrictions, governance provisions
(including expanded Board representation), and
detailed requirements for programming standards, educational services, and community engagement. Finally, it sets a seven- year term (with a possible three-year extension) and includes extensive legal provisions governing compliance, indemnification, records, and transition of operations upon termination.