• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

107.5 problems

R

rbrucecarter

Guest
What happened to their output power? Last time I went down to Houston, they made it almost to Centerville. Now, they are having problems even making it to Huntsville. Does going digital sap that much power out of the analog? If so, IBOC will cause major coverage problems!
 
> What happened to their output power? Last time I went down
> to Houston, they made it almost to Centerville. Now, they
> are having problems even making it to Huntsville. Does
> going digital sap that much power out of the analog? If so,
> IBOC will cause major coverage problems!
>

I don't know, but their stick is down in Lake Jackson, which is due south of downtown Houston, so if you were getting them that far north, you were doing good. I remember when KTBZ occupied that frequency, I'd start to lose them just north of Conroe. <P ID="signature">______________
The Bitterness of Poor Quality Lingers Long After The Sweetness of Low Price Is Long Forgotten.</P>
 
> I don't know, but their stick is down in Lake Jackson, which
> is due south of downtown Houston, so if you were getting
> them that far north, you were doing good. I remember when
> KTBZ occupied that frequency, I'd start to lose them just
> north of Conroe.

Nope - this just started. I have had them by Centerville for the past 2 or 3 years, every trip down from Dallas. They were one of the stronger Houston signals in that area, one of the first to come in and last to fade when I went back North. The coverage difference is very obvious. The only thing I can think of that changed is that they went digital. IBOC must drain transmitter power to a much larger degree than I thought. If I owned an FM, I would be very concerned about losing that much coverage. If my listeners want good signal quality out in the suburbs - loss of coverage would be a compelling reason NOT to go digital.

This could also explain some really crummy reception I am getting on some locals. I thought it was just the heat wave - but maybe it is IBOC sucking the transmitter power away from the fringes.
 
> > I don't know, but their stick is down in Lake Jackson,
> which
> > is due south of downtown Houston, so if you were getting
> > them that far north, you were doing good. I remember when
>
> > KTBZ occupied that frequency, I'd start to lose them just
> > north of Conroe.
>
> Nope - this just started. I have had them by Centerville
> for the past 2 or 3 years, every trip down from Dallas.
> They were one of the stronger Houston signals in that area,
> one of the first to come in and last to fade when I went
> back North. The coverage difference is very obvious. The
> only thing I can think of that changed is that they went
> digital. IBOC must drain transmitter power to a much larger
> degree than I thought. If I owned an FM, I would be very
> concerned about losing that much coverage. If my listeners
> want good signal quality out in the suburbs - loss of
> coverage would be a compelling reason NOT to go digital.
>
> This could also explain some really crummy reception I am
> getting on some locals. I thought it was just the heat wave
> - but maybe it is IBOC sucking the transmitter power away
> from the fringes.
>
strange, KLDE at 107.5 was one of the first ones to lose when driving north of Conroe, understandable since their transmitter is between Texas City and Lake Jackson.
Heres the link for the coverage map.
http://www.radio-locator.com/cgi-bin/pat?call=KLDE&service=FM&status=L&hours=U
 
> This could also explain some really crummy reception I am
> getting on some locals. I thought it was just the heat wave
> - but maybe it is IBOC sucking the transmitter power away
> from the fringes.

Take this with the appropriate grain of salt: I am not an engineer, nor have I discussed this with one. It's just my best guess.

Before they turned on the IBOC they installed a new antenna system.

I'd bet that has more to do with coverage than the IBOC.

Also, remember, they're trying to put the most signal over where the most people in the Houston market live... and that's not Centerville and points north of there.<P ID="signature">______________
...co-moderator of the Satellite Radio, Phoenix, and San Diego boards...</P>
 
> Also, remember, they're trying to put the most signal over
> where the most people in the Houston market live... and
> that's not Centerville and points north of there.

A new antenna would probably explain it - the coverage was stable well North of Huntsville to Centerville for years. Every trip, I could predict where to tune in by landmarks.

I would think, though, that if a top of the line Pioneer Supertuner, with the narrow ceramic filter trick effectively increasing its sensitivity even more has trouble with KLDE in Huntsville, normal radios are losing it well to the South in the "Houston suburbs" like the Woodlands and Conroe. Now THAT would be serious issue for KLDE. If I were KLDE, I would seriously consider dropping IBOC that nobody can hear, and get back listeners that definitely can hear analog. They may not be going for Centerville, but directionality puts signal up that direction, and a good signal in Centerville means dependable coverage in Conroe on $5 clock radios. Or car radios with crappy antennas. You want your deep fringe signal level as far away as possible, and not over populated, affluant areas.

I would even be upset over losing Huntsville, there are a lot of people there, a significant chunk of listeners.
 
> A new antenna would probably explain it - the coverage was
> stable well North of Huntsville to Centerville for years.
> Every trip, I could predict where to tune in by landmarks.

107.5 was running a Shivley antenna for the longest (thanks to former DOE Burt Goldman from Secret/Shamrock days...then he went to ABC and is now with First Broadcast)...Shivley's have a great pattern...just dont let an ant pee on it!!
or any ICE at ALL form...then it goes to crap! I hate Shivleys....not impressed with them....

> I would think, though, that if a top of the line Pioneer
> Supertuner, with the narrow ceramic filter trick effectively
> increasing its sensitivity even more has trouble with KLDE
> in Huntsville, normal radios are losing it well to the South
> in the "Houston suburbs" like the Woodlands and Conroe. Now
> THAT would be serious issue for KLDE. If I were KLDE, I
> would seriously consider dropping IBOC that nobody can hear,
> and get back listeners that definitely can hear analog.
> They may not be going for Centerville, but directionality
> puts signal up that direction, and a good signal in
> Centerville means dependable coverage in Conroe on $5 clock
> radios. Or car radios with crappy antennas. You want your
> deep fringe signal level as far away as possible, and not
> over populated, affluant areas.

Huntsville is not in the Houston DMA for Arbitron....so it doesnt matter...remember NUMBERS in their market is what counts..not fringe area...
If they go to a new antenna that has downtilt and moves the signal from the horizon at Centerville to putting MORE signal into Houston and the suburban areas, they dont care if they lose the fringe...they are NOT selling spots there!
A good signal at the extreme range can mean poor signal closer in due to the high gain and narrow beamwidth of the signal....thats NOT what they want...
Loss of signal at the horizon can mean they went to downtilt or nullfill and thus putting more signal over their advertiser area...which is what they DO want.
IBOC on FM does NOT affect analog coverage...in fact, it is usually a separate transmitter that is doing about 10% ERP of the analog signal...those that do low level combining (which requires a new transmitter since normal FMs run Class C in the amp stages and digital requires linear or Class B or AB mode) usually dont have any changes...those running HI level combining will lose about 90% of their digital signal in a dummy load (the xmtr is doing almost as much as the analog but only 10% gets to the antenna) and the analog must do more to make up for loss in the combiner (about 10-20%)....
BUT IBOC on FM does not cause the problems as it does on AM!!
 
> > Also, remember, they're trying to put the most signal over
>
> > where the most people in the Houston market live... and
> > that's not Centerville and points north of there.
>
> A new antenna would probably explain it - the coverage was
> stable well North of Huntsville to Centerville for years.
> Every trip, I could predict where to tune in by landmarks.
>
>
> I would think, though, that if a top of the line Pioneer
> Supertuner, with the narrow ceramic filter trick effectively
> increasing its sensitivity even more has trouble with KLDE
> in Huntsville, normal radios are losing it well to the South
> in the "Houston suburbs" like the Woodlands and Conroe. Now
> THAT would be serious issue for KLDE. If I were KLDE, I
> would seriously consider dropping IBOC that nobody can hear,
> and get back listeners that definitely can hear analog.
> They may not be going for Centerville, but directionality
> puts signal up that direction, and a good signal in
> Centerville means dependable coverage in Conroe on $5 clock
> radios. Or car radios with crappy antennas. You want your
> deep fringe signal level as far away as possible, and not
> over populated, affluant areas.
>
> I would even be upset over losing Huntsville, there are a
> lot of people there, a significant chunk of listeners.
>
I drive to Dallas at least six to eight times a year and KLDE has been a regular to Centerville for years. I did some digging in the web last night and came across many articles that stated the analog signal lost 11% of the power when IBOC is installed, even Ibiquity acknowledges this. Now 11% percent wouldn't make that drastic difference, but there was one article by an engineer that stated the power loss can actually be up to 60% of the analog signal, depending on the installation. Does anyone have any reports on KKRW, they are using IBOC aren't they? There are too many articles to list, go to the search engine www.dogpile.com and enter in "Loss of Analog Coverage to FM stations with IBOC Digital radio" and you will get a ton of returns.

This may explain why I get much more fading of KIOL when I am driving around Houston than the other rim shot stations. Listening to KIOL is more like listening to one of the LA stations when you get down to the San Diego County line.

I have worked in Huntsville and Bay City and both cities listen to the Houston FM stations over any others. If Ibiquity's digital plan actually makes it or is shoved down our throat by the government, and the FCC has already shown how little they knew about HDTV and the fragility of the digital signal, yet presented HDTV to the citizens like they had all the answers. HD-R is not any better than HDTV, probably worse since it is being used in vehicles and the terrain, buildings and other factors that weren't suppose to cause problems to digital radio are as bad, maybe worse than analog stereo.

The digital signal is only good to the 1mV/m or 60dbu signal strength at best, the number that is being used more frequently now is 2mV/m. Once the digital signal drops below the threashold of say 1mV/m the signal just drops out. If there is no analog signal to fall back on, you will have hiss.

KLDE on my OEM Chevy Truck radio circa 1991 has a great signal(it did the last trip to Dallas) and the approximate strength in Huntsville is 36.82dbu or 0.069mV/m, and still very listenable, but generally weak is 23.77dbu or 0.015mV/m in Centerville. Depends on the ducting, as I usually drive up to Dallas leaving Houston around 10pm to 1am when the traffic is usually very light and you can make some time. Come back from Dallas on Friday evening, leaving Richardson around 5pm to 6pm. With the exception of the stations on Cedar Hill that share frequencies with Houston stations, I have had many Houston stations in Stereo right into downtown Dallas and the Mixmaster before they drop out.

If there is a "sunset date" for analog radio and digital is all we have and it is Ibiquity's system, Conroe will be the end of the line for most all of the Houston stations. KIOL which is usually very listenable at home has a signal of 57.4dbu where I live, I probably can not get a digital signal from KIOL or KACC if they were only digital as they strength drops down to 48.9dbu where I live, yet most of the time I have a good signal. If FM or AM is only good in digital to 60dbu (FM) which is 1mV/m or 1mV/m on AM, traveling is going to be a much bigger hastle changing stations frequently, unless you load up on CD's.

I read several articles last night that said stations should be driving around now if they have IBOC installed and identify the drop out areas and start making plans for booster stations in those areas. This does not sound like a great improvement over what we have now for anyone, except Ibiquity. One paragraph that made a lot of sense was in a moving vehicle with road and traffic noise, you would never be able to tell the difference from a CD and FM Stereo. While you may need a 10mV/m AM signal in the city, like Houston, on the open road out in the country, you can get a very good sound from a signal as weak as 0.25mV/m, well below the strength you could hear the station in digital. What I found disturbing, well one of many things, was that now the digital signal is being pushed up to the 2mV/m strength for "realiable coverage" from 1mV/m. This decreases the size of a stations coverage area even more than what was originally discussed. I would love to know what Ibiquity's definition of "realiable coverage" is, the signal only drops out every few minutes or rarely?

AM radio will remain a non music source, the chances of Ibiquity's IBOC working does not look very healthy. For one thing IBOC can not handle the sharp nulls that many directional patterns have on AM stations, especially at night. IBOC will take a null and round it out and change the directional pattern of a station, which means it no longer meets FCC specs and must reduce power or go off the air. The station reduces power, goes off the air or the FCC accepts the new IBOC pattern which will only add more interference to a band that is plaqued by interference at night. In all three cases many AM stations will become unlistenable at night, very effectively making AM a daytime band. KPRC 950 wouldn't make it outside of The Loop without interference which also kills the IBOC signal.

I am all for digital radio, but the system that the US and only the US is going to be using does not sound like it had the actual listener in mind at all. No wonder Ibiquity is pressing so hard to sell as many IBOC units as possible before their house of cards comes tumbling down. If KLDE's 25% loss of coverage of their analog signal is because of IBOC, the Senior Road tenents may hold off on the installation even longer. These "delays" may be more to study the effects of IBOC on KLDE and KKRW and KIOL than anything.

I have KRBE on, and at 10:35pm and they had a call from Huntsville, so the use of FM signals beyond the the 60dbu {1mV/m} or worse the 66dbu {2mV/m} signal is very commmon. If KRBE was all digital that call would have never happened because the woman that called would never had heard KRBE.

Huntsville may not be part of Houston officially, but believe me there is a lot of people that live in one of the two cities and work in the other. Anyone that drives the 45 north knows how the traffic thins out after Huntsville most of the time, except hunting season and weekends. The 59 towards El Campo is not much different. No need to mention the 10.

Mike O
 
Read the post above yours --- they seem very knowledgable about the subject.

That post spells DOOM for FM IBOC! If that 60% signal loss is anywhere close to real, it just won't be worth it in areas like Houston and DFW where population growth has occurred far from the tower site.

I was noticing that some Dallas stations are not getting out like they used to, either. And this could account for some of the dropouts / weak spots I get 60 to 70 miles from the towers - right in the middle of Plano / Allen / Mc Kinney one of the prime audiences for most DFW stations. IBOC in DFW may be even more disasterous. Unlike Houston, where the bulk of the city is near Missouri City, in DFW the towers are South of Ft. Worth. Then comes the mid-cities, then Dallas, finally the wealthy suburbs of Richardson, Plano, McKinney. The affluent audience is at the fringes!!!

I doubt people in the Woodlands or Conroe will appreciate IBOC if it means they can only get their stations in the car, and then poorly. And that is where the most affluent listeners in Houston are.
 
> Read the post above yours --- they seem very knowledgable
> about the subject.

If CW is the engineer that I suspect he is, you shouldn't be dismissing what he has to say, because he knows what he is talking about!<P ID="signature">______________
...co-moderator of the Satellite Radio, Phoenix, and San Diego boards...</P>
 
> Read the post above yours --- they seem very knowledgable
> about the subject.

Were you meaning Mike or the article he was mentioning? I dont believe Mike is a broadcast engineer....and I am not sure what publication he got that from...
(Hmmm I need to renew a couple come to think of it!)...an analog FM station MUST maintain its transmitter power output and ERP it is licensed for...and under FCC Part 73 rules, they can only be 5% above or 10% below that before they must do something to correct it...(if the power drops to below 90%, a station has 30days to correct it before requesting a STA from the FCC).

SOOO to post a correct statement, the LOSS mentioned COULD be loss in a combiner with the digital xmtr injected after the FM analog....but a FM going IBOC MUST maintain their ANALOG ERP....so a 100KW FM C is still a 100KW station...the digital signal is much less..Here is a real case scenario:
A FM 100KW Class C at 1600ft and an 8 bay antenna using 3 1/8 rigid line; analog xmtr is doing 32.5KW out. Assuming HIGH level combining, the analog transmitter MUST go up to 36.6KW to maintain 100KW ERP at the antenna...the digital xmtr is running 3.3KW avg and after the 10db coupler, the digital ERP is 1 KW avg/3.56 KW PK !!! There is your 60db difference..BTW 6500watts is LOST in a reject dummy load of the combiner...wasted heat and RF!

Other ways of better doing it are lowlevel combining (which requires a NEW analog xmtr that can handle FM AND AM signals...most FM transmitters run non linear amps in the final...higher efficiency...but that does not work with IBOC....it requires a LINEAR amp which is not as eff as a Class C amp)..or separate antennas on the tower; called space combining...or
the 3db combining (at the antenna or through a split combiner operating in reverse for the digital..) These are much more efficient than high level combining...but costs more...and the ERP is the SAME as I noted before.

(BTW I have been a broadcast engineer since the 70s and a member of the Society of Broadcast Engineers.....I have read all the documentation on IBOC and even talked to those involved in IBOC conversions....)

> That post spells DOOM for FM IBOC! If that 60% signal loss
> is anywhere close to real, it just won't be worth it in
> areas like Houston and DFW where population growth has
> occurred far from the tower site.

Only the fringe will see problems...also cochannel interference will really kill the decoders...but listeners in Conroe, etc wont notice any difference....if the fringe goes away, there is no loss of advertising dollars and thats what counts. City grade coverage for 100KW at 2000ft is about 45 miles or so.

> I was noticing that some Dallas stations are not getting out
> like they used to, either. And this could account for some
> of the dropouts / weak spots I get 60 to 70 miles from the
> towers - right in the middle of Plano / Allen / Mc Kinney
> one of the prime audiences for most DFW stations. IBOC in
> DFW may be even more disasterous. Unlike Houston, where the
> bulk of the city is near Missouri City, in DFW the towers
> are South of Ft. Worth. Then comes the mid-cities, then

Nope...the major DFW antenna farm is Cedar Hill....SW of Dallas on Hwy 67...
it is closer to Dallas than Ft Worth....and the hill is a 300+ ridge....with the towers at 1600ft there, the range is pretty close to the 2000ft in Houston...

> Dallas, finally the wealthy suburbs of Richardson, Plano,
> McKinney. The affluent audience is at the fringes!!!

KSOC 94.5 which is a rimshot in DFW (45m north of downtown Dallas) is running IBOC and not losing any analog range....as for the IBOC coverage....how many have a rcvr to check ?? :)
I understand another FM there is running IBOC but I dont recall who it is.
 
> > Read the post above yours --- they seem very knowledgable
> > about the subject.
>
> If CW is the engineer that I suspect he is, you shouldn't be
> dismissing what he has to say, because he knows what he is
> talking about!

Thanks John! I appreciate the kind words...
 
> KSOC 94.5 which is a rimshot in DFW (45m north of downtown
> Dallas) is running IBOC and not losing any analog
> range....as for the IBOC coverage....how many have a rcvr to
> check ?? :)

If tropo is your friend, you can hear KSOC in digital at Love Field without falling back to analog.

Under normal conditions, it picket-fences back and forth from digital to analog.

I wonder how well IBOC will penetrate buildings. I've only heard it in the car.<P ID="signature">______________
...co-moderator of the Satellite Radio, Phoenix, and San Diego boards...</P>
 
> I understand another FM there is running IBOC but I dont
> recall who it is.

There was a posting a while back on the DFW board that KOAI 107.5 had fired up IBOC. Guess you can drive along I-45 with your "HD" receiver to see where there's any digital clash with KLDE.
 
> I drive to Dallas at least six to eight times a year and
> KLDE has been a regular to Centerville for years.

There are some stretches of I-45 in Leon and Freestone counties where the 107.5 signal had been surprisingly listenable in the past, such as the KZFX years after the 2000' facility went on the air in 1986. The KOAI (and predecessors) signal on 107.5 usually was toast south of the Freestone/Navarro county line.
 
> There was a posting a while back on the DFW board that KOAI
> 107.5 had fired up IBOC. Guess you can drive along I-45
> with your "HD" receiver to see where there's any digital
> clash with KLDE.

It would be really strange to have the digital on one drop out and blend with the analog from the other. Given the loss in coverage that seems to come with IBOC, it may never happen.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom