> Just curious...what is any better? Nashville has a heavy
> concentration of AM stations, they might as well be
> religious. What are we lacking? We have two 50kW stations on
> AM: one is news/talk, the other is a country station.
> Elsewhere on AM, you have sports (560), liberal talk (1430),
> standards (1200), spanish-language (too many to count),
> religious (too many to count)...all AM strongholds
> nationwide. Seriously, find me something we don't have.
> Otherwise, one more religious station won't hurt.
Okay, here's how it breaks down on the AM dial in Nashville, according to TVRadioWorld:
11 Country
10 Religious (including southern gospel and black gospel)
03 Spanish (hardly "too many to count")
02 Talk Radio (right-leaning)
01 Talk Radio (left-leaning)
01 Standards
01 Sports
01 Urban (WVOL)
01 Oldies
I'm playing by your definitions here, and I will label WPLN a "left-leaning" station. But that does not make WPLN a counter to WLAC in any way, shape or form. WPLN is not a non-stop political ramrod like WLAC is, but I will identify it as left-leaning. (I do find it interesting, however, that you refer to WPLN as "liberal talk" but refer to WLAC as simply "news/talk".) But I digress.
AM radio in Nashville is saturated with religious stations, all of them sharing a nearly identical ideological/theological/political point of view (i.e., fundamentalist Christianity). How does that serve the public interest? And how does adding an *eleventh* nearly-identical station to the Nashville airwaves fill any kind of void whatsoever?
Don't get me wrong, I'm as opposed to WAMB surrendering it's 50kw signal to yet another religious broadcaster as I am to the rumors of WVOL surrendering it's historic urban format to Air America. This is a diverse city, and our public airwaves should reflect that.