Wow! A lot of good comments and ideas here.
Before I comment further, let me state for the record: while I am employed by Cox Radio/Dayton, these are my ideas...and mine alone. I have never spoken with anyone from Atlanta or even senior management in Dayton about this. Take one look at my paycheck, and you'd realize I have nothing to do with corporate.
The reason I raise these points is: AM radio is badly broken. For it to survive, some type of fix is a necessity. Every station on AM can't be syndicated talk, religion or sports. By clearing out some of the "deadwood", the stations that remain might have a chance, especially if they figure out how to fix AM digital, and get the receivers in people's hands.
Kirkiefan: You said it all in your post: you talk about "struggling local market AM's" and that's exactly the point. WIZE is barely a cipher in the Clark County breakout most of the time. WULM hasn't shown up there since the Yontz's owned it. Those stations could be made profitable...but...not as standalones, unless you want to run satellite delivered programming with a skeleton staff, and what good is that to a local community? Now, Radio Maria will own WULM. Good for them. I can't wait to see the ratings for the nighttime programming with that whopping 36 watts (or whatever they have). Does Springfield deserve radio service? Absolutely. Does it need 3 stations? It's a question that could be raised.
For Hippo: Do I agree with the "need" to move a station 60 miles to put it in a bigger market? That depends. Does every small town need a Class B 50 Kilowatter? No. Less ground to cover makes a strong "A" a more wise choice. (Less on the power bill). Could those "B's" be put to better use in a bigger market? Perhaps. But, I agree I see little need to move a station just so it can be a flanker with 1 share.
And, we're in agreement about AM's in medium to large markets that are being "thrown away". So it is rumored, Clear Channel might like to sell WONE. They certainly deserve compensation for it, but I'd rather see that station in the hands of someone like Jim Johnson, who's taken a lousy daytime signal on 1210, kept it above a one share and provides a valuable local radio service with WDAO. That station might pull a 2 or more with a better signal....or the fulltime service might allow him to be more competitive. That might allow the FCC to get rid of 1210 entirely in Dayton. But, if any owner deserves more power and a better signal, it's Jim. But, again, I speak only in the context of: "if I ruled radio, I would..." I point the next comment at no one, but...if you're not trying to run a station to make it work, you shouldn't own the license. Dayton could survive with 2 AM's...maybe 3. Cincinnati and bigger markets, 3 or 4. And the smaller towns nearby a metro could be better served by the regional stations with accountability a requirement (see below).
I raised this idea on another of the boards, and a poster reminded me that there are some smaller communities in mountain regions where AM is viable, because it travels more easily in the rugged terrain. My thought was to reserve a portion of the AM band for "local service" (much like FM cordons off some space for non-comm, educationals), to accomodate AM owners, who, at renewal time can prove they are a viable, profitable part of their community. Let them explain how they handle local news, how they serve their local area...let businessmen in the area write letters to the Commission explaining how these stations help their businesses. These licensees could be granted new licenses in the "local service" portion with, say a minimum of 5 KW full time. Or at the very least, 5 KW day/2.5 KW night. Perhaps a station like WDAO might fit in this catagory. So, too...might the WBZI's of the world. If you gave them a 5K fulltime non-D signal, they probably wouldn't need 3 stations!
Absolutely, I would protect as many 50 K Clears as possible...maybe moving some in the reallocation of the band. Every other "regional" gets 10 K fulltime. But, regionals would also be held to the same standards as the "local service" stations. They'd have to show the FCC that they are truly programming to and covering their region. No daytimers. It's time to end that idea that was good back in the 50's...but makes no sense today. And I'd minimize as much as possible, directional stations. There could be cases where it's necessary and I can see room for some. But, non-D would be the rule of the day as much as humanly possible. I'm not against the idea of having "regional" stations in smaller towns, but the owner's would have to provide, and be ready to prove they are serving the "region". I can live with voicetracking (where it makes sense), I can live with consolidated staffs (actually, I kinda like being able to do different jobs within a station) but, I also want accountability back in ownership.
What do I mean? Every station should have to make a committment to news and public affairs coverage. Be it a small one, or a large one. No Xeroxed "issues list" in a public file that doesn't describe dates and times that programming aired that actually addressed the issues and what they were about. There are broadcasters who do this, others don't do as good of a job.
Every station should have an "emergency coverage plan" in the file, to cover those "what happens if" situations. I've heard it mentioned that the FCC might require daytimers to man their operations 24/7. I don't see where that's necessary or even possible. But at the absolute minimum, there should be a plan to cover those 3 AM emergencies. And the FCC should hold the owner's feet to the fire if they don't come through in a pinch. Though cluster operations in most cities, if not all, should have at least one person in the building 24/7 to handle the 3 AM emergency and call in the troops when needed.
You ask me where to start: I say everywhere. Big markets...and little ones. I'm not trying to "protect" any corporate entity here. I want to see the problem fixed. Radio spectrum is finite. (Unless the FCC changes that!) "Everybody" can't own their own terrestrial radio station...and junking up either AM or FM with more stations than they can handle to satisfy various political factions does radio no good in the long run. Yes, I want, appreciate and welcome minority ownership. But constantly backing off on channel protection standards to allow the "creation" of more tiny stations that will get tiny audiences and make tiny money while interference on FM escalates is not the way to make it happen. If you do, FM will be like AM in about, oh...10 years or less.
Generally, I'm for some level of LP-FM's provided...they offer a unique local service to their coverage area. Sorry, but piped-in religion from a big FM 60 miles away is not a "unique local service" in my book. I also think LP-FM's should be allowed to sell commercial time. Let me do my best Neal Boortz impersonation and call the baby "ugly" here. That stipulation was forced by "Big Radio" (whoever that is), because some people were afraid that somebody might get an LP-FM license and give the bigger local station a run for its' money. The FCC's answer (were it truly concerned about expanding "localism") should have been "tough"! But, in supporting LP-FM, giving 2 or 3 of these peashooters to virtually every community in America would be a nightmare of interference that needs to be avoided, period. Why? Spectrum is finite. If you want a ton of LP-FM's, let's expand the FM band a bit, and carve out some frequencies for the low power guys. Make it (I don't know) 85 Mhz-108 Mhz. Terrestrial TV's about to go away. Maybe a small amount of spectrum space for low powered local stations might make sense.
And, please don't get the idea I'm "anti religious radio". I'm not. WFCJ....WEEC...WCDR...all provide great service to their listeners. I'm just against the idea of a religious broadcaster in, say, Cleveland putting his station's programming on 2,000 LP-FM's..simply...to make money. (Ok, sorry, I'm calling the baby "ugly" here, too...) You want more stations? Buy stations that cover some ground! There are numerous religious entities (not all, to be certain) who could afford it.
All this having been said, I want to repeat something I've said on other boards here. Not every corporation is doing radio right these days...but not every corporation is screwing it up, either. Most radio companies, if they own stations in markets of any size are corporations, anyway. There are "corporate" owners who own 15-25 stations. Corporate owners who own a hundred or less. And, a lot of them do radio pretty well. But, no argument...there's always room for improvement.
OK...I've now written a small book here. If I've forgotten anyone on it, call me on it and I'll respond again. I don't necessarily think I've got everything right here, either. But, I think it's time in the industry to have this discussion. I care...and you should. Let's talk about it.
Before I comment further, let me state for the record: while I am employed by Cox Radio/Dayton, these are my ideas...and mine alone. I have never spoken with anyone from Atlanta or even senior management in Dayton about this. Take one look at my paycheck, and you'd realize I have nothing to do with corporate.
The reason I raise these points is: AM radio is badly broken. For it to survive, some type of fix is a necessity. Every station on AM can't be syndicated talk, religion or sports. By clearing out some of the "deadwood", the stations that remain might have a chance, especially if they figure out how to fix AM digital, and get the receivers in people's hands.
Kirkiefan: You said it all in your post: you talk about "struggling local market AM's" and that's exactly the point. WIZE is barely a cipher in the Clark County breakout most of the time. WULM hasn't shown up there since the Yontz's owned it. Those stations could be made profitable...but...not as standalones, unless you want to run satellite delivered programming with a skeleton staff, and what good is that to a local community? Now, Radio Maria will own WULM. Good for them. I can't wait to see the ratings for the nighttime programming with that whopping 36 watts (or whatever they have). Does Springfield deserve radio service? Absolutely. Does it need 3 stations? It's a question that could be raised.
For Hippo: Do I agree with the "need" to move a station 60 miles to put it in a bigger market? That depends. Does every small town need a Class B 50 Kilowatter? No. Less ground to cover makes a strong "A" a more wise choice. (Less on the power bill). Could those "B's" be put to better use in a bigger market? Perhaps. But, I agree I see little need to move a station just so it can be a flanker with 1 share.
And, we're in agreement about AM's in medium to large markets that are being "thrown away". So it is rumored, Clear Channel might like to sell WONE. They certainly deserve compensation for it, but I'd rather see that station in the hands of someone like Jim Johnson, who's taken a lousy daytime signal on 1210, kept it above a one share and provides a valuable local radio service with WDAO. That station might pull a 2 or more with a better signal....or the fulltime service might allow him to be more competitive. That might allow the FCC to get rid of 1210 entirely in Dayton. But, if any owner deserves more power and a better signal, it's Jim. But, again, I speak only in the context of: "if I ruled radio, I would..." I point the next comment at no one, but...if you're not trying to run a station to make it work, you shouldn't own the license. Dayton could survive with 2 AM's...maybe 3. Cincinnati and bigger markets, 3 or 4. And the smaller towns nearby a metro could be better served by the regional stations with accountability a requirement (see below).
I raised this idea on another of the boards, and a poster reminded me that there are some smaller communities in mountain regions where AM is viable, because it travels more easily in the rugged terrain. My thought was to reserve a portion of the AM band for "local service" (much like FM cordons off some space for non-comm, educationals), to accomodate AM owners, who, at renewal time can prove they are a viable, profitable part of their community. Let them explain how they handle local news, how they serve their local area...let businessmen in the area write letters to the Commission explaining how these stations help their businesses. These licensees could be granted new licenses in the "local service" portion with, say a minimum of 5 KW full time. Or at the very least, 5 KW day/2.5 KW night. Perhaps a station like WDAO might fit in this catagory. So, too...might the WBZI's of the world. If you gave them a 5K fulltime non-D signal, they probably wouldn't need 3 stations!
Absolutely, I would protect as many 50 K Clears as possible...maybe moving some in the reallocation of the band. Every other "regional" gets 10 K fulltime. But, regionals would also be held to the same standards as the "local service" stations. They'd have to show the FCC that they are truly programming to and covering their region. No daytimers. It's time to end that idea that was good back in the 50's...but makes no sense today. And I'd minimize as much as possible, directional stations. There could be cases where it's necessary and I can see room for some. But, non-D would be the rule of the day as much as humanly possible. I'm not against the idea of having "regional" stations in smaller towns, but the owner's would have to provide, and be ready to prove they are serving the "region". I can live with voicetracking (where it makes sense), I can live with consolidated staffs (actually, I kinda like being able to do different jobs within a station) but, I also want accountability back in ownership.
What do I mean? Every station should have to make a committment to news and public affairs coverage. Be it a small one, or a large one. No Xeroxed "issues list" in a public file that doesn't describe dates and times that programming aired that actually addressed the issues and what they were about. There are broadcasters who do this, others don't do as good of a job.
Every station should have an "emergency coverage plan" in the file, to cover those "what happens if" situations. I've heard it mentioned that the FCC might require daytimers to man their operations 24/7. I don't see where that's necessary or even possible. But at the absolute minimum, there should be a plan to cover those 3 AM emergencies. And the FCC should hold the owner's feet to the fire if they don't come through in a pinch. Though cluster operations in most cities, if not all, should have at least one person in the building 24/7 to handle the 3 AM emergency and call in the troops when needed.
You ask me where to start: I say everywhere. Big markets...and little ones. I'm not trying to "protect" any corporate entity here. I want to see the problem fixed. Radio spectrum is finite. (Unless the FCC changes that!) "Everybody" can't own their own terrestrial radio station...and junking up either AM or FM with more stations than they can handle to satisfy various political factions does radio no good in the long run. Yes, I want, appreciate and welcome minority ownership. But constantly backing off on channel protection standards to allow the "creation" of more tiny stations that will get tiny audiences and make tiny money while interference on FM escalates is not the way to make it happen. If you do, FM will be like AM in about, oh...10 years or less.
Generally, I'm for some level of LP-FM's provided...they offer a unique local service to their coverage area. Sorry, but piped-in religion from a big FM 60 miles away is not a "unique local service" in my book. I also think LP-FM's should be allowed to sell commercial time. Let me do my best Neal Boortz impersonation and call the baby "ugly" here. That stipulation was forced by "Big Radio" (whoever that is), because some people were afraid that somebody might get an LP-FM license and give the bigger local station a run for its' money. The FCC's answer (were it truly concerned about expanding "localism") should have been "tough"! But, in supporting LP-FM, giving 2 or 3 of these peashooters to virtually every community in America would be a nightmare of interference that needs to be avoided, period. Why? Spectrum is finite. If you want a ton of LP-FM's, let's expand the FM band a bit, and carve out some frequencies for the low power guys. Make it (I don't know) 85 Mhz-108 Mhz. Terrestrial TV's about to go away. Maybe a small amount of spectrum space for low powered local stations might make sense.
And, please don't get the idea I'm "anti religious radio". I'm not. WFCJ....WEEC...WCDR...all provide great service to their listeners. I'm just against the idea of a religious broadcaster in, say, Cleveland putting his station's programming on 2,000 LP-FM's..simply...to make money. (Ok, sorry, I'm calling the baby "ugly" here, too...) You want more stations? Buy stations that cover some ground! There are numerous religious entities (not all, to be certain) who could afford it.
All this having been said, I want to repeat something I've said on other boards here. Not every corporation is doing radio right these days...but not every corporation is screwing it up, either. Most radio companies, if they own stations in markets of any size are corporations, anyway. There are "corporate" owners who own 15-25 stations. Corporate owners who own a hundred or less. And, a lot of them do radio pretty well. But, no argument...there's always room for improvement.
OK...I've now written a small book here. If I've forgotten anyone on it, call me on it and I'll respond again. I don't necessarily think I've got everything right here, either. But, I think it's time in the industry to have this discussion. I care...and you should. Let's talk about it.