• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

1st Public Radio Broadcast 100 Years Ago Today

Where is Willard Scott when you need him?
Wikipedia said:
January 13, 1910 – The first public radio broadcast, a live performance of the opera Cavalleria rusticana, was sent out over the airwaves from the Metropolitan Opera House in New York City.

The Saturday afternoon live broadcasts of the Metropolitan Opera are still heard on public radio stations throughout the US.
 
Hmmm, not exact;y "public radio," as we know it today:

The Met's radio broadcast history dates back to 1910, when radio pioneer Lee De Forest transmitted — experimentally, with erratic signal — two live partial performances from the stage of the Met, which were reportedly heard as far away as Newark, New Jersey. The first of these was a performance of Acts II and III of Tosca on January 12, 1910.
 
MattParker said:
Where is Willard Scott when you need him?
Wikipedia said:
January 13, 1910 – The first public radio broadcast, a live performance of the opera Cavalleria rusticana, was sent out over the airwaves from the Metropolitan Opera House in New York City.

The Saturday afternoon live broadcasts of the Metropolitan Opera are still heard on public radio stations throughout the US.

That's something interesting to think about. It reinforces the truth that radio wasn't created by government decree. "Public" radio is an invention of people, the early pioneers of radio. It wasn't something created by the government.
 
The Met broadcasts may be heard predominantly on public radio these days, but that's only because commercial radio walked away from them. There was no such thing as "commercial radio" when DeForest made his transmission in 1910, of course, and when commercial radio began in earnest a decade later there was plenty of opera heard on it.

KYW began in Chicago with nothing but broadcasts of the Lyric Opera there, and the Met was heard mostly on commercial radio for many, many decades.
 
Scott Fybush said:
The Met broadcasts may be heard predominantly on public radio these days, but that's only because commercial radio walked away from them. There was no such thing as "commercial radio" when DeForest made his transmission in 1910, of course, and when commercial radio began in earnest a decade later there was plenty of opera heard on it.

KYW began in Chicago with nothing but broadcasts of the Lyric Opera there, and the Met was heard mostly on commercial radio for many, many decades.

I can just imagine it: "KYW, all opera, all the time. You give us 2 hours and 22 minutes and we'll give you the fat lady who sings."
 
MattParker said:
Scott Fybush said:
The Met broadcasts may be heard predominantly on public radio these days, but that's only because commercial radio walked away from them. There was no such thing as "commercial radio" when DeForest made his transmission in 1910, of course, and when commercial radio began in earnest a decade later there was plenty of opera heard on it.

KYW began in Chicago with nothing but broadcasts of the Lyric Opera there, and the Met was heard mostly on commercial radio for many, many decades.

I can just imagine it: "KYW, all opera, all the time. You give us 2 hours and 22 minutes and we'll give you the fat lady who sings."

For what it's worth, opera was hot stuff in 1911. Only opera singers had the training to sing loud enough to be recorded well on the old wax cylinders they used back then. Even when they switched to flat platter records, it was still a mechanical recording system, so sheer volume was an important asset to recording anything. Opera was also popular as a live entertainment medium because opera singers could fill an auditorium, while other singers had to stick to small sized venues in those days before the PA system with loudspeakers was invented. I learned this from a close friend who collects and reconditions antique wind-up wax cylinder recorders. He also showed me that around the turn of the century, most wax cylinder players were also recorders, and that home recordings were actually quite common in the few households that could afford an Edison player.

Another fun bit of trivia is that in the early days of silent movies, opera singers were in great demand as actors and actresses. Since opera singers usually sang in Italian or German, they had to communicate the meaning of what they were singing to English speaking audiences through broad gestures. Those same gestures were perfect for silent movies. Stage actors were too accustomed to using their voices to act, and couldn't adapt to the broad gestures needed in the early silent movies. Once movie directors came to rely on closeups instead of just wide shots, the practice of using opera stars in silent movies ended.
 
One other small thing. Technically, the opposite of public radio isn't commercial radio. The opposite is private radio. The title of this thread is correct because the broadcast of 100 years ago was made to anyone in the public who had a receiver tuned to the right frequency.

In 2011, "public radio" is shorthand for "publicly financed radio", as opposed to "commercially financed radio".

In 1911, the means for private radio communications hadn't been invented yet. And, though the broadcast this thread is about wasn't paid for through the sale of commercials, it was paid for by private interests, not government handouts.
 
Talk_Dude said:
In 1911, the means for private radio communications hadn't been invented yet. And, though the broadcast this thread is about wasn't paid for through the sale of commercials, it was paid for by private interests, not government handouts.

One reason: There was no federal income tax until two years later. Once that happened, things began to change, reaching a climax 20 years later.
 
I notice elsewhere on this board, that on the 40th anniversary of the first public radio broadcast El Rushbo entered the world. As a result, radio shifted from the fat lady singing to the fat guy talking. Required lung power appears to have remained the same.

Prior to the income tax, the main source of federal income was duties and tariffs. But the corporations who control the government shifted from protectionism to internationalism - they decided money could be made in importing and exporting and ultimately becoming multi-national. They also decided to shift the burden of supporting the federal government from themselves to us. Corporations use the media to distract people from seeing that corporations really run the government and that government money is spent mostly for the benefit of corporations. War: What is it good for? It's good for business. Government regulations? Eliminates competition. Big companies get bigger.
 
MattParker said:
corporations really run the government and that government money is spent mostly for the benefit of corporations.

Everyone wants jobs. Who does most of the hiring? Who provides the lions share of the health insurance for those workers? Who oversees their retirement? Who is counted on to support charities?

The government helps the poor. The corporations help the middle income. The rich help themselves. That's how things work. I can't tell you how many corporate workers I know who don't know how to live without company benefits, without the company telling them what to do. People want structure in their lives, and they either get it from the job or the government.
 
TheBigA said:
MattParker said:
corporations really run the government and that government money is spent mostly for the benefit of corporations.

Everyone wants jobs. Who does most of the hiring? Who provides the lions share of the health insurance for those workers? Who oversees their retirement? Who is counted on to support charities?

The government helps the poor. The corporations help the middle income. The rich help themselves. That's how things work. I can't tell you how many corporate workers I know who don't know how to live without company benefits, without the company telling them what to do. People want structure in their lives, and they either get it from the job or the government.

Who does most of the firing? Who gives executives inflated salaries and bonuses while doing most of the firing? Who defaults on pensions to retirees? Who gets rid of people before retirement to avoid paying their pensions? Who leads charitable campaigns and pressures their employees to contribute? Who engages in illegal collusion and price-fixing? Who engages in false and deceptive advertising? Who lobbies and buys off politicians?

Not everybody wants structure, at least not that kind of structure. Those that do make it possible for people like Hitler to gain power. You should read Ayn Rand.
 
Anyone want in on a pool about when this gets moved to TIO? Everyone send me a dollar and your bet for when it will be moved. Whoever comes closest without going past the actual time gets the pool, less a 25% service fee for me for running it.
 
MattParker said:
Who does most of the firing? Who gives executives inflated salaries and bonuses while doing most of the firing? Who defaults on pensions to retirees? Who gets rid of people before retirement to avoid paying their pensions?

You sound like one of those "glass half empty" guys.
 
TheBigA said:
MattParker said:
Who does most of the firing? Who gives executives inflated salaries and bonuses while doing most of the firing? Who defaults on pensions to retirees? Who gets rid of people before retirement to avoid paying their pensions?

You sound like one of those "glass half empty" guys.

Half empty if I'm drinking. Half full if I'm pouring.
 
The glass is twice as big as it needs to be.
 
I am a collector of antique audio, and do a weekly radio show about it. Although cylinder records were first, by the mid 1890s, there was already competition between cylinders and discs. Cylinders sounded better then discs through 1905 or so. In 1908, Columbia Records, followed a year or two later by Victor, began marketing "double-sided discs". Two songs for the price of one! One on each side, of course. This was the first big nail in the coffin of the cylinder product. By 1911, disc records had the upper hand. By 1915, I think there were only two cylinder manufacturers in the U.S. - Edison and Indestructible, with Indestructible being a small concern, and Edison surrepititiously admitting that their cylinders were a second-rate product, as their primary focus was on the Edison Diamond Disc. In Sept. 1914, they stopped recording directly for cylinder, and made inferior dubs of their disc masters onto their otherwise upgraded "Blue Amberol cylinders. Once the patents started running out during the World War I era of 1917-1918, the door was flung open for tons of new record brands, none of which were cylinders manufacturers. In the 1920s, Indestructable went out of business (a fire ruined everything, and it wasn't worth starting up again), and Edison slogged along to the end of the decade with every decreasing sales of both cylinders and their disc line, until all of their commercial recording was stopped at the end of October, 1929.
 
People in the music industry blame radio for the collapse of record sales in the 1930s. I'm not kidding. I've had them say it to my face.
 
that would make it 99 years and 49 weeks since the first
Public Radio Pledge Drive... ::)
 
Yeah... The composers complained about sheet music sales dropping from the advent of radio too. It all sort of reminds me of their current complaint about the internet. They like to blame others for their lack of sales in a time period while, in reality, today's problem comes from putting out a inferior product and their resistance to change within their business model.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom