vibe said:I might be wrong but isn't there a direct correlation between income and % of people using cable/satelite?
Yeah, I've gone by my share of run down houses with new pick ups, a bass boat, and a dish but correct me if I'm wrong, I believe the correlation is there.
Conventional wisdom says that there is a correlation, but I'm a bit skeptical. Aside from all the anecdotal comments that I've seen in this thread about poor people with cable or satellite (and I've seen plenty of that, too), I also know a bunch of middle class people (myself included) who are OTA-only. In my case, that's OTA digital...I tend to ignore the analog broadcasts completely, since the digital signals look so much better. While there may yet be a link between income and OTA TV viewing, the correlation may not be as simple as believed -- for example, I wouldn't be surprised to see that the cable/satellite subscription rate is higher for the poor and the well-off than it is for the middle class that falls between.
One correlation that apparently is real is a racial one: Hispanics are less likely to subscribe to cable or satellite than are other groups. Which makes sense, since it isn't like there is a huge amount of extra programming for Hispanic viewers on cable and satellite to justify the cost of a subscription.