Very interesting article demonstrating not only that classic hits is moving more toward the 80s but that musically the top 20 are a bit more rock oriented than the prior list.
As for the 1,000 songs, if I was in a position to hire you to set up a format for me, you'd be my first call. I really agree that music is only part of the mix. There are so many elements of programming and marketplace promotion and imaging that goes in to creating a successful station. And none of it comes without hard work and a never give up attitude. You might be just a shade ahead of your time. You are on to a trend in my opinion waiting on radio to react to what you already see.
I say this because in 1976, I was discovering top 40 was not pacing as it should with a 40% currents/60% recurrent and oldies. I pondered playing just the hits. Four years later Michael Joseph launched hot hits. It wasn't that I was some programming guru, never have been, but rather noticed a trend. It took a while before radio simply reacted. At that time I had no place to try my idea and more often than not, my ideas have no stage to test them. That's okay, I'm not unusual because there are others out there that will find a stage and try it.
I consider myself really lucky in that I began as a jock, then in to programming (all small town and smaller rated cities) before being forced in to sales and finally getting in to management. Unlike many GMs that have no time in the programming/on air side, I have a chicken and egg theory about sales and programming. You can't have the egg without the chicken and you can't have the chicken without the egg. I put programming and sales on equal footing although I realize the station revolves around the almighty dollar. I refuse to sacrifice one for the other for fast cash because such a decision is always paid back later, usually in a more costly way.
It's very true sales are swayed by the personality and likability of the sales person but you still have to offer a great product. The challenge is to find the programming talent and the sales talent with great communications skills, ethics, can play well with others and driven to work for others' success. When you hit that point of nirvana, a good GM sits back and basks in the warm glow of a group of people that exceed your expectations while thanking your lucky stars. After all, it's a great group of talent that makes a great GM.
The shared talent here is not wasted on me. Differing opinions and suggestions are certainly a reason to dig deeper and learn more.
As for the 1,000 songs, if I was in a position to hire you to set up a format for me, you'd be my first call. I really agree that music is only part of the mix. There are so many elements of programming and marketplace promotion and imaging that goes in to creating a successful station. And none of it comes without hard work and a never give up attitude. You might be just a shade ahead of your time. You are on to a trend in my opinion waiting on radio to react to what you already see.
I say this because in 1976, I was discovering top 40 was not pacing as it should with a 40% currents/60% recurrent and oldies. I pondered playing just the hits. Four years later Michael Joseph launched hot hits. It wasn't that I was some programming guru, never have been, but rather noticed a trend. It took a while before radio simply reacted. At that time I had no place to try my idea and more often than not, my ideas have no stage to test them. That's okay, I'm not unusual because there are others out there that will find a stage and try it.
I consider myself really lucky in that I began as a jock, then in to programming (all small town and smaller rated cities) before being forced in to sales and finally getting in to management. Unlike many GMs that have no time in the programming/on air side, I have a chicken and egg theory about sales and programming. You can't have the egg without the chicken and you can't have the chicken without the egg. I put programming and sales on equal footing although I realize the station revolves around the almighty dollar. I refuse to sacrifice one for the other for fast cash because such a decision is always paid back later, usually in a more costly way.
It's very true sales are swayed by the personality and likability of the sales person but you still have to offer a great product. The challenge is to find the programming talent and the sales talent with great communications skills, ethics, can play well with others and driven to work for others' success. When you hit that point of nirvana, a good GM sits back and basks in the warm glow of a group of people that exceed your expectations while thanking your lucky stars. After all, it's a great group of talent that makes a great GM.
The shared talent here is not wasted on me. Differing opinions and suggestions are certainly a reason to dig deeper and learn more.
Last edited: