Part 1- Change. Is it always good?
Season’s Greetings. I wish you all the very best this holiday season and for the New Year. This “reflections” string has become a tradition for our board going on 12 years. This time, it was hard to motivate myself to do it. Perhaps you'll understand why once I post everything.
There’s a lot of frustration and anger out there. Overall, the folks are disgusted because they feel they have no voice. We see that in various polls. People are frustrated with dysfunction in government, politicians, and the political establishment who don't seem to listen. On the subject of radio, listeners use the station’s social media to sometimes sound off about any number of things. It’s rare to see responses and sometimes comments do get deleted if there is major change. It reinforces the feeling of having no voice. It seems we're getting more introverted and happier in our own little worlds. Indeed, we are in control there!
The younger generation almost always have their heads buried in any number of tech toys. Adults are almost as absorbed. It’s all an escape and surprisingly I’m not challenging any of that. Music is my big escape today. While I always was into music, it was more about enjoying than seeking escape.
Whenever anyone challenges the status quo, it often invites a critique of the messenger. I see Corporate America, of which I had a long career, in the same way I see radio. Strategic decision making is often concentrated at the top. Perhaps there’s some going through the motions soliciting feedback at the local/lower management level but it almost always comes down to what the company wants and not what those in the trenches see as better alternatives. I often see merits of both sides and look for solutions that give a little something to both. But the reality is, that doesn't happen nearly enough.
Few have the brass to protest. It’s all about being the stand-up guy. It’s about not making waves. Disagree too much and you’re out or demoted. Not all decisions are perfect. As I have long said “decisions have consequences.” Bad decisions can result in the loss of one’s livelihood. This is serious stuff.
I don’t view radio change as a positive or negative until I sort through it. If the listeners or the community as a whole benefit from the change, then I’m usually on board.This is not easy as you would think because it's important to put personal preferences aside. In one of my last posts in this string, I will elaborate on this more. I’ve seen radio justify virtually every decision they make even when overwhelming consensus of opinion disagrees. Even when those decisions result in format failure, how often do you see the company admit mistakes? Ratings and revenue weigh heavily but when haven’t they?
The core values of the individual company come in to play when ratings, revenue and other factors are analyzed and used as justification for change. We’ve seen ratings and revenue track records pass muster at one company but fail to make the cut with another or even a successor company. The kicker is those successor companies are often the lean and mean ones who are in better financial health than the companies that earn admiration from some of us.
In my view, a good deal of the business side of radio is nothing less than brutal. The operating procedures of increasing numbers of radio companies today distress me. Many of the programming practices, listener centered decisions, and the roles of talent I have long supported are all at odds with most current thinking. There are still some radio companies around that do things a little differently. Perhaps it can be said they take a higher road but their numbers are dwindling. I’ll speak of one a bit later in this string.
Next: WOKV & Bucking The Trends
Season’s Greetings. I wish you all the very best this holiday season and for the New Year. This “reflections” string has become a tradition for our board going on 12 years. This time, it was hard to motivate myself to do it. Perhaps you'll understand why once I post everything.
There’s a lot of frustration and anger out there. Overall, the folks are disgusted because they feel they have no voice. We see that in various polls. People are frustrated with dysfunction in government, politicians, and the political establishment who don't seem to listen. On the subject of radio, listeners use the station’s social media to sometimes sound off about any number of things. It’s rare to see responses and sometimes comments do get deleted if there is major change. It reinforces the feeling of having no voice. It seems we're getting more introverted and happier in our own little worlds. Indeed, we are in control there!
The younger generation almost always have their heads buried in any number of tech toys. Adults are almost as absorbed. It’s all an escape and surprisingly I’m not challenging any of that. Music is my big escape today. While I always was into music, it was more about enjoying than seeking escape.
Whenever anyone challenges the status quo, it often invites a critique of the messenger. I see Corporate America, of which I had a long career, in the same way I see radio. Strategic decision making is often concentrated at the top. Perhaps there’s some going through the motions soliciting feedback at the local/lower management level but it almost always comes down to what the company wants and not what those in the trenches see as better alternatives. I often see merits of both sides and look for solutions that give a little something to both. But the reality is, that doesn't happen nearly enough.
Few have the brass to protest. It’s all about being the stand-up guy. It’s about not making waves. Disagree too much and you’re out or demoted. Not all decisions are perfect. As I have long said “decisions have consequences.” Bad decisions can result in the loss of one’s livelihood. This is serious stuff.
I don’t view radio change as a positive or negative until I sort through it. If the listeners or the community as a whole benefit from the change, then I’m usually on board.This is not easy as you would think because it's important to put personal preferences aside. In one of my last posts in this string, I will elaborate on this more. I’ve seen radio justify virtually every decision they make even when overwhelming consensus of opinion disagrees. Even when those decisions result in format failure, how often do you see the company admit mistakes? Ratings and revenue weigh heavily but when haven’t they?
The core values of the individual company come in to play when ratings, revenue and other factors are analyzed and used as justification for change. We’ve seen ratings and revenue track records pass muster at one company but fail to make the cut with another or even a successor company. The kicker is those successor companies are often the lean and mean ones who are in better financial health than the companies that earn admiration from some of us.
In my view, a good deal of the business side of radio is nothing less than brutal. The operating procedures of increasing numbers of radio companies today distress me. Many of the programming practices, listener centered decisions, and the roles of talent I have long supported are all at odds with most current thinking. There are still some radio companies around that do things a little differently. Perhaps it can be said they take a higher road but their numbers are dwindling. I’ll speak of one a bit later in this string.
Next: WOKV & Bucking The Trends
Last edited: