Maybe on a sub-feed but not the main channel.ESPN will have Chris Berman call Super Bowl Games.
Maybe on a sub-feed but not the main channel.ESPN will have Chris Berman call Super Bowl Games.
Isn't Berman retired? He and his corny old shtick were being pushed out the door by ESPN for years. Why on earth would they want him to call the Super Bowl?Sprectrum will get rid of SD versions of HD channels,add Decades and so on National Feeds,Other local News Channels.
CCI will add channels to all its Lineups to have all the same.
ESPN will have Chris Berman call Super Bowl Games.
...This may be especially true for those who cut the cord in the first place primarily to save $$$. At one time lots of quality content was available for free via the web, and national networks and some other programming was available OTA to many, so between the two and maybe a Netflix subscription they were covered. Now, a lot of the types of programming that could once be found and streamed at no cost, requires a subscription and all of those various services for all the content some want to see adds up.More people get frustrated with streaming (as we see with the disputes between Disney and YouTubeTV) and head back to cable.
...This may be especially true for those who cut the cord in the first place primarily to save $$$. At one time lots of quality content was available for free via the web, and national networks and some other programming was available OTA to many, so between the two and maybe a Netflix subscription they were covered. Now, a lot of the types of programming that could once be found and streamed at no cost, requires a subscription and all of those various services for all the content some want to see adds up.
Discovery is a good example where lots of their archived programs and old episodes of popular shows from the various networks they own was once available free of charge on their various websites. Now you pay to see it on Discovery+. Once it becomes a situation where people start paying "too much" in their opinions for all those different streaming services and regional sports networks and other programming they'll need to pay for piecemeal, then cable or dish may become attractive again...Unless, of course, in the example of the Notre Dame game in the post above, that horse has already bolted and they may be surprised to find that not everything that was once available via a cable subscription is always still going to be there.
The other thing I noted about HGTV in particular is that they'll have endless reruns and "marathons" of a show like Home Town, then during the breaks they'll show teasers for some really attractive and interesting looking programs, and tell you at the end that "You can see all this and more with a subscription to Discovery+...Now back to endless episodes of worn out, boring ole' Home Town via your cable provider".
MTV and VH-1 haven't played music videos in years, much less non-stop, 24/7 with well-known "VJs" as they did decades ago.1. innovate (MTV playing 24/7 "Ridiculousness" is the lazy programmer's way out)
Actually, most initially "cut the cord" with cable and dish as they were paying astronomical monthly fees, and when many people looked at what they were actually viewing, they maybe only watched 1/2 dozen or fewer channels on a regular basis, yet were paying for 800 or more. For many it made more sense to stream only the stuff they wanted to watch, much of it available until relatively recently for free or at minimal cost, and maybe pick up a subscription service like Netflix for movies.2. limit commercial breaks (having more ads than content is the reason why people cancelled cable/satellite in droves).
MTV and VH-1 haven't played music videos in years, much less non-stop, 24/7 with well-known "VJs" as they did decades ago.
Actually, most initially "cut the cord" with cable and dish as they were paying astronomical monthly fees, and when many people looked at what they were actually viewing, they maybe only watched 1/2 dozen or fewer channels on a regular basis, yet were paying for 800 or more. For many it made more sense to stream only the stuff they wanted to watch, much of it available until relatively recently for free or at minimal cost, and maybe pick up a subscription service like Netflix for movies.
We rarely sit through commercials, though we subscribe to cable (for our particular case and viewing habits, it was the best option. That may change one day, depending). Comcast allows one to use the pause button on the remote to buffer up to 30 minutes of programming. For a sporting event that starts at 7, we can start watching at 7:30 and the buffer allows us to sail through commercials and even stuff like 1/2 time highlights and interviews we don't care to see, as we're most interested in the actual contest. While some "on-demand" programs forbid using fast forward at least during commercial breaks, much of the programming will allow you to forward through everything. Subscribers to Comcast get complimentary access to Peacock premium. The few programs we've watched there have allowed us to jump ahead to anywhere within the program, including skipping past breaks.
My wife (a huge Pioneer Woman fan) was excited about the Food Network's movie in which Ree Drummond makes an appearance, only to find out it's only on Discovery Plus. Fortunately, I found a free trial. Ms. Drummond was on-screen a total of 5 minutes...This may be especially true for those who cut the cord in the first place primarily to save $$$. At one time lots of quality content was available for free via the web, and national networks and some other programming was available OTA to many, so between the two and maybe a Netflix subscription they were covered. Now, a lot of the types of programming that could once be found and streamed at no cost, requires a subscription and all of those various services for all the content some want to see adds up.
Discovery is a good example where lots of their archived programs and old episodes of popular shows from the various networks they own was once available free of charge on their various websites. Now you pay to see it on Discovery+. Once it becomes a situation where people start paying "too much" in their opinions for all those different streaming services and regional sports networks and other programming they'll need to pay for piecemeal, then cable or dish may become attractive again...Unless, of course, in the example of the Notre Dame game in the post above, that horse has already bolted and they may be surprised to find that not everything that was once available via a cable subscription is always still going to be there.
The other thing I noted about HGTV in particular is that they'll have endless reruns and "marathons" of a show like Home Town, then during the breaks they'll show teasers for some really attractive and interesting looking programs, and tell you at the end that "You can see all this and more with a subscription to Discovery+...Now back to endless episodes of worn out, boring ole' Home Town via your cable provider".
I am frustrated with streaming right now, but not so much that I would head back to cable. I mean I would be getting the same problem. On Hulu, my main concerns are the occasional connection problem (this happens on cable too) and the price ($70, although a lot, is still better than the $120+ I probably paid for cable). I would go buy an ATSC 3.0 tuner before I would go back, just saying.More people get frustrated with streaming (as we see with the disputes between Disney and YouTubeTV) and head back to cable.
Welcome to the modern world. Binging is the name of the game. That's not lazy, it's adapting to consumer behavior."Marathoning" episodes of one program has been a very common programming model with cable TV for two decades, but it's become a lazy way to program channels. I miss the days where there was a set schedule of a number of different programs.
I don't think so, since reality TV is not their forte.The CW could change to a mostly "producer pays the network for airtime" model, a la the PAX/"i" model of the 2000's, if they haven't gotten that far with their non-scripted series already.
Specifically the behavior of consumers in the demographic that is barely represented, if at all, in this forum.Welcome to the modern world. Binging is the name of the game. That's not lazy, it's adapting to consumer behavior.
I look at them continuing to broadcast "Masters of Illusion" and the iHeartRadio specials and wonder if the producers are paying the network for airtime. "Masters of Illusion" and its sibling specials like the "Hollywood Christmas Parade" aren't necessarily "network quality" shows (you can argue that they're not even "CW-quality" shows), and any executive at The CW would probably agree. The CW doesn't make money airing scripted programs - they get more viewers for those shows on streaming platforms.I don't think so, since reality TV is not their forte.
Welcome to the modern world. Binging is the name of the game. That's not lazy, it's adapting to consumer behavior.
No one ever went broke underestimating the tastes of the American public.I look at them continuing to broadcast "Masters of Illusion" and the iHeartRadio specials and wonder if the producers are paying the network for airtime. "Masters of Illusion" and its sibling specials like the "Hollywood Christmas Parade" aren't necessarily "network quality" shows (you can argue that they're not even "CW-quality" shows), and any executive at The CW would probably agree. The CW doesn't make money airing scripted programs - they get more viewers for those shows on streaming platforms.
But how many times can one watch an repeat episode of "Ridiculousness" or "Say Yes To The Dress" before getting tired of it? It's not like these networks have 1,000 episodes of each show at their disposal.
Cord cutting. My Comcast subscription (from my bill). $90 for Internet, $10 for landline, leaves $80 for TV (including HBO)No one ever went broke underestimating the tastes of the American public.
When it stops working, they'll move on.But how many times can one watch an repeat episode of "Ridiculousness" or "Say Yes To The Dress" before getting tired of it? It's not like these networks have 1,000 episodes of each show at their disposal.