R
radioelizabeth
Guest
bueller said:Absolute nonsense and defense of the status quo.
Would you care to address my point about how broadcasters like EMF have driven up entry costs and taken frequencies? I imagine not, because you can't defend their tactics and see any reasonable way for the independents to compete against them.
As for Clear Channel, the fact you defend a company that has raped radio speaks volumes. You can't defend the pillaging of a youth ministry in OKC for a satellite delivered, non local, generic product targeted at a totally different audience. That frequency was completely done wrong at the hands of EMF. No excuses.
Please show me where I posted nonsense.
I addressed the concept of competition. That ought to cover the defense you are after.
It does speak volumes. What you hear in it is up to your ears, but I stand behind the post.
Again, you call it pillaging. You think the frequency was done wrong. But you are blaming the wrong people. If you think it was wrong for that format to switch, take it up with the sellers...not the buyers.
So again, the posts are bias as well.