Within what our lawmakers hopefully determine to be the start of life.But with respect, that's something you believe that isn't shared by all. A person should have a choice whether or not to abort based on their own beliefs and whether it's medically safe.
That is prevention on of pregnancy, not the termination of what may be... at some time in the future... be agreed on to be the start of life.If I believed (and I don't) that having children was terrible for the planet because human overpopulation causes climate change, I may choose not to have a child myself. But would I go around telling others not to have children? Or push for legislation that bans having children? Of course not, because I don't have the right to force others to live by my values.
I've lived much of my life in nations where there were more than two significant political parties, and in those cases things are always decided by the joining of two or more parties on a particular subject to reach a majority agreement. What we are seeing now is the need for sub-groups to unite to consider issues, not the particular flag their party flies.To take things back to radio, I think we need a lot more listening, a lot more conversation and a lot less preaching - whether that's religious preaching over the airwaves, or conservative or liberal talk hosts talking past one another to their own audiences. It's the only way to fix a divided society.