carolinaradio said:I still have Beatles, Beach Boys, and Supremes burnout from the "good times, great oldies" era of the format in the early 2000s.
Good radio wouldn't have burned you out on them. Bad radio did.
carolinaradio said:I still have Beatles, Beach Boys, and Supremes burnout from the "good times, great oldies" era of the format in the early 2000s.
I don't consider the typical "good times, great oldies" format good radio - good songs, but most were played to death. At least the oldies/classic hits stations today aren't quite as repetitive.jakej said:carolinaradio said:I still have Beatles, Beach Boys, and Supremes burnout from the "good times, great oldies" era of the format in the early 2000s.
Good radio wouldn't have burned you out on them. Bad radio did.
carolinaradio said:I don't consider the typical "good times, great oldies" format good radio - good songs, but most were played to death. At least the oldies/classic hits stations today aren't quite as repetitive.
jakej said:Nu_Roo_2 said:VODood said:Regarding Minneapolis, Pittsburgh and Cleveland. All midwest towns with a rock/Top 40 heritage.
That statement is very true for Columbus too, although in keeping with Cbus' perennial anonymity that fact isn't nationally recognized. Won't go into the history here, but there's plenty of it, dating further back than most markets. I'd imagine this is one assertion where jakej, who formerly published a local fanzine, would be in full agreement, even though -- unlike me -- he wouldn't want to use it to justify giving Columbus the somewhat edgier and/or slightly broader types of Oldies/Classic Hits stations you currently see in Pittsburgh, Minneapolis and Cleveland.
Jason Roberts said:Yes, Jake...most people like the hits. I know you don't believe that. But, it's true.
Okay, you guys sound like you're trying to spur me into posting again today, so I won't let you down! I'm not sure how Columbus' rock and roll scene compared to what was happening in other towns back during the '60s and '70s, but throughout the 1980s there were a lot of great things that happened here, I think it's fair to say that we were the envy of many towns that were our size and larger, and I published The Offense to give our city's many enthusiastic fans an opportunity to document all of that excitement that was being felt everywhere.
But now fast-forward twenty years, from 1980-89 to 2000-08 -- I'm visiting our radio stations trying to get a show or format on the air, anytime that someone meets with me I give him a back issue or two of the zine, usually no one meets with me so I can only leave it at the front desk for him instead, but in either case, no one in the business seems particularly impressed with The Offense -- to them it doesn't matter, proves nothing, waste of good paper. The copies of it are treated with the same disdain that the promotional copies of albums were that I handed out or dropped off at the same places some twenty years earlier. When I booked a band into the Newport or Stache's back during the '80s that was touring to support an LP of theirs that had recently been released, I'd usually be sent twenty or so copies of the record, and even though I soon realized that I was wasting my time trying to get FM airplay for any of those records, I'd keep visiting the stations with the stuff anyways, just to let them know that despite their best efforts, they hadn't succeeded in getting rid of me or the music yet. This was a war that they were not going to win. And they didn't. Instead of the music being killed, bands like Nirvana eventually came along, and the music took over.
People who like the hits will like "Secrets" tonight -- "Poor Baby" by the Cowsills, "Pretty Baby" by Blondie, "Pretty Ballerina" by the Left Banke, weren't those ... sort of hits, anyways??? And Friday's show will be even better, because I figure a lot of people will be listening to President Obama instead of me at 7:00 tonight, and so I'm saving my choice words about 93.3's format switch for tomorrow night's episode. But tonight will still be good, and thanks, Dispatch, for including "Yesterday's Top Secrets" in your TV/Radio "Highlights" block in today's edition. That is, seriously, about the 60th time that we've popped up in there!
jakej said:carolinaradio said:I still have Beatles, Beach Boys, and Supremes burnout from the "good times, great oldies" era of the format in the early 2000s.
Good radio wouldn't have burned you out on them. Bad radio did.
Jason Roberts said:My only sole contention with you, Jake over the years...is your view that playing "stiffs" equates to getting listeners. It does not and that's been proven over and over and over....even right there in Columbus!
There are "stiffs" and lots of them...but there are also well known songs not always played on radio that can be played in the right circumstance. Some companies choose to ignore that fact, others don't.
But, I have no problem with what you're doing with your show. You're trying to appeal to a niche audience (though it's a minority of the audience)...but, a small station doing that as a specialty show is fine. But, that kind of show never works on a station that actually has to get ratings and a large audience to make money. Which is why none of the program directors would take you up on your offer.
Now, you can choose not to believe that...you're not the first to try what you're doing...but it's the truth.
jakej said:Just because something was a stiff in terms of sales when it first came out 20, 30, 40, or 50 years ago, I don't know how it can automatically be assumed that people wouldn't enjoy listening to it now.
Nu_Roo_2 said:I notice they're still playing that syndicated Saturday night rhythmic-oldies show music, but with the the standard Oldies 93.3 imaging. Almost wish they wouldn't do that, as it just drives home how many wonderful, uptempo hits are missing from the regular programming -- and that's only on the rhythmic side.Perhaps 1/3 or more of these tunes were smash hits, while some are very secondary.
Nu_Roo_2 said:I notice they're still playing that syndicated Saturday night rhythmic-oldies show music, but with the the standard Oldies 93.3 imaging. Almost wish they wouldn't do that, as it just drives home how many wonderful, uptempo hits are missing from the regular programming -- and that's only on the rhythmic side.Perhaps 1/3 or more of these tunes were smash hits, while some are very secondary.
kirschner said:Nu_Roo_2 said:I notice they're still playing that syndicated Saturday night rhythmic-oldies show music, but with the the standard Oldies 93.3 imaging. Almost wish they wouldn't do that, as it just drives home how many wonderful, uptempo hits are missing from the regular programming -- and that's only on the rhythmic side.Perhaps 1/3 or more of these tunes were smash hits, while some are very secondary.
Hi Roo...
Sorry to disappoint you, but Saturday nights on 93.3 are not syndicated and haven't been for at least the past 4 years. I've been in-studio on W. 5th every Saturday night taking requests and playing them for listeners right here in Columbus since 2007.
Need proof? Call me some night and I'll give you the correct pronunciation of "Olentangy" or "Gahanna." ;D
KK
Nu_Roo_2 said:kirschner said:Nu_Roo_2 said:I notice they're still playing that syndicated Saturday night rhythmic-oldies show music, but with the the standard Oldies 93.3 imaging. Almost wish they wouldn't do that, as it just drives home how many wonderful, uptempo hits are missing from the regular programming -- and that's only on the rhythmic side.Perhaps 1/3 or more of these tunes were smash hits, while some are very secondary.
Hi Roo...
Sorry to disappoint you, but Saturday nights on 93.3 are not syndicated and haven't been for at least the past 4 years. I've been in-studio on W. 5th every Saturday night taking requests and playing them for listeners right here in Columbus since 2007.
Need proof? Call me some night and I'll give you the correct pronunciation of "Olentangy" or "Gahanna." ;D
KK
Mea Culpa Kirsch, I should have known that! :-[ <--(R-I's poor attempt at an "embarrassed" emoticon)
As for "Olentangy" and "Gahanna," the fact that I've never noticed you mispronouncing either one on Gen-X is proof enough that you know how to say them. Or maybe that you've never needed to? OK, I guess the latter is highly unlikely.![]()
pbf1 said:jakej said:Just because something was a stiff in terms of sales when it first came out 20, 30, 40, or 50 years ago, I don't know how it can automatically be assumed that people wouldn't enjoy listening to it now.
EXTREMELY true. Case in point: "What I Like About You" by the Romantics.