• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

95.5 Mason

Strange that it's airing Air1 since it is reportedly programmed by Clear Channel as listed on radio locator. Did CC trade this translator to KLOVE? The transmitter is at the 1360 tower running 70 watts.
 
95.5 is on the WLW aux tower in Mason. 1360 is in Mount Healthy.
96.9 is also using a WKFS HD signal. Must be a CC/EMF deal.
Radio-Locator doesn't say who is programming it, just which signal is being translated.
 
microbob said:
Strange that it's airing Air1 since it is reportedly programmed by Clear Channel as listed on radio locator.

EMF is using a HD Channel belonging to one of Clear Channel's FM stations to feed this translator.. They are doing this because they can't feed 95.5 via satellite directly due to it being in the commercial band.

CC/EMF have many partnerships in many cities.. including Cincinnati .. That's how the project works at 100.7... It's actually an EMF owned translator that CC's programming via one of their own HD signals.
 
schmave said:
How long before Cox (rightly) complains? That's cutting right into 95.3 and 95.7.
Is there really anything Cox can truely Complain about their Dayton Stations getting cut out of the cincinnati Market.

95.3 & 95.7 are marketed to the Dayton market last i recalled not the cincinnati Market. and 95.5 translator is market towards the Cincy market
 
MikeStandardsFromIndiana said:
schmave said:
How long before Cox (rightly) complains? That's cutting right into 95.3 and 95.7.
Is there really anything Cox can truely Complain about their Dayton Stations getting cut out of the cincinnati Market.

95.3 & 95.7 are marketed to the Dayton market last i recalled not the cincinnati Market. and 95.5 translator is market towards the Cincy market

I am well aware they are not marketed to Cincinnati, but if the 95.5 signal is cutting into 95.3 or 95.7 in northern Warren County or the southern part of the Dayton metro, Cox would have every right to complain.
 
At 70watts, it would seem that unless they are on a tall tower, they are using the Aux WLW tower, the signal should be confined to their COL. Tropo conditions might cause problems in those areas on occasion though.
 
MikeStandardsFromIndiana said:
Is there really anything Cox can truely Complain about their Dayton Stations getting cut out of the cincinnati Market.
95.3 & 95.7 are marketed to the Dayton market last i recalled not the cincinnati Market. and 95.5 translator is market towards the Cincy market

If a regular listener complains to the station that he can no longer hear it, his location doesn't matter. He can be well outside the station's service contour. Cox, however, can't complain unless a listener complains to them first.
 
schmave said:
How long before Cox (rightly) complains? That's cutting right into 95.3 and 95.7.

I will only speak for myself here...but just how much real interference does 70 watts make?

I program a 100 watt station that gets about 10 miles on good weather days. I don't see that 70 watts in Mason will make that big of difference to a station in Xenia, and another whose tower is in Southern Shelby County at 50,000 watts.
 
You'd be surprised at how much interference many of these translator signals can cause, especially when they get authorized on the same freq as a full power signal, but right over the line of the original station's secondary contour. Hills and terrain, as you have in Warren County and the Miami Valley, can make even a 70w signal go a lot further than what you see mapped on a flat piece of paper. Now put up a 250w translator at 400 feet or higher, and you've got something to notice! (Cincinnati had at least one or two of those, or it did when I was in the area a few years ago.)

A station I worked at not long ago in the area got covered up and lost its Cincinnati coverage just beyond its secondary countour in mid-Warren County. What doesn't get discussed is the amount of hiss and signal beating that occurs beyond the audible range of a translator, or any other co-channel allocation squeezed in tight to another signal. It adds a lot of flutter when driving where there used to be only a little multipath on a signal. And the temperature inversion days you get in summer will do havoc to signals, if you're anywhere near the edge of even the primary contour. It's making a lot of the FM band for motorists as much fun as nighttime AM listening now. Good luck keeping many of your favorites intereference-free now as you drive between metro Cincy and Dayton-Springfield.
 
Jason Roberts said:
schmave said:
How long before Cox (rightly) complains? That's cutting right into 95.3 and 95.7.

I will only speak for myself here...but just how much real interference does 70 watts make?

I program a 100 watt station that gets about 10 miles on good weather days. I don't see that 70 watts in Mason will make that big of difference to a station in Xenia, and another whose tower is in Southern Shelby County at 50,000 watts.

I hope that doesn't happen, especially when I'm listening to your stations driving between Columbus and Cincinnati. It does bug me when these flea-power stations wedge themselves around far more powerful stations from big markets and just cut into that listening area. There are two such stations in Zanesville at 103.3 and 103.7 that severely hamper 103.5 from Columbus' reception to the east in areas where it otherwise could be heard just fine.
I assume you were speaking of WRPO, and I can't think of any larger stations within spitting distance that that signal cuts into. That to me has never seemed a problem when I drive up into that area. But that might be just because I like the station's programming.
 
Goldilocks94941 said:
You'd be surprised at how much interference many of these translator signals can cause, especially when they get authorized on the same freq as a full power signal, but right over the line of the original station's secondary contour. Hills and terrain, as you have in Warren County and the Miami Valley, can make even a 70w signal go a lot further than what you see mapped on a flat piece of paper. Now put up a 250w translator at 400 feet or higher, and you've got something to notice! (Cincinnati had at least one or two of those, or it did when I was in the area a few years ago.)

A station I worked at not long ago in the area got covered up and lost its Cincinnati coverage just beyond its secondary countour in mid-Warren County. What doesn't get discussed is the amount of hiss and signal beating that occurs beyond the audible range of a translator, or any other co-channel allocation squeezed in tight to another signal. It adds a lot of flutter when driving where there used to be only a little multipath on a signal. And the temperature inversion days you get in summer will do havoc to signals, if you're anywhere near the edge of even the primary contour. It's making a lot of the FM band for motorists as much fun as nighttime AM listening now. Good luck keeping many of your favorites intereference-free now as you drive between metro Cincy and Dayton-Springfield.

Yes...but remember, 95-7 up in Dayton's transmitter is in Southern Shelby county...way up to the north. I wouldn't think, IMHO, that south of Dayton and south of Montgomery County is not really being considered...
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom