• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

97.1 FM country legends

What evidence do you have to support the lack of ratings is the result of "not of any interest" as opposed to "unacceptable?"
Well, what evidence do YOU have that the ratings mean that KIKK is "unacceptable" rather than just "not of any interest"? You made the initial claim, so that burden falls on you.

I think it's clear everything here (including your posts) has been based on opinion rather than fact. To ask for "evidence" on an opinion is a disingenuous way to approach a healthy debate about sports betting formats.
 
Sports betting, such as all-sports, is not a purely ratings driven format. The concept of being an all-male foreground format sells well, and those stations also garner sports marketing money which other statiohns can not get.

I hope you don't think anyone but AM DXers listens to noisy, fading distant AM stations any longer.

Among persons over 60.

Better a format like sports betting which has a separate revenue stream than a 0.1 share that is totally unsalable.
.1…. I can’t wrap my head around that.
 
Well, what evidence do YOU have that the ratings mean that KIKK is "unacceptable" rather than just "not of any interest"? You made the initial claim, so that burden falls on you.
The ratings.
I think it's clear everything here (including your posts) has been based on opinion rather than fact. To ask for "evidence" on an opinion is a disingenuous way to approach a healthy debate about sports betting formats.
Wait, didn't you just call on me to provide evidence? Which, by the way, I did.
 
The ratings.
What evidence do you have to support the lack of ratings is the result of "unacceptable" as opposed to "not of any interest?" (This is literally copypasta of your post earlier).
Wait, didn't you just call on me to provide evidence? Which, by the way, I did.
You're having a classic case of having your cake and eating it too. You haven't provided a source for your claims, yet demand that others explain any sort of narrative that disagrees with your view. It's textbook logical fallacy.

Either provide a source that directly links KIKK's ratings to our region's alleged unacceptable views on gambling or clarify that you're stating an opinion. Because I can tell you right now that the majority of Texans support sports gambling. According to the Hobby School of Public Affairs at the University of Houston, ~75% of adults supported an amendment to legalize sports gambling in Texas. [SOURCE]
 
Back to 97.1. I just heard them mention how they're now on 92.9 HD2. They also mentioned their HD3 format which is still silent. They did say something along the lines of "more ways of listening to Country Legends" alongside 97.1.
 
There are many things that are causing poor ratings at that station, starting with the 250 watt AM signal.

I could hear this particular 250 watt AM signal where I was working yesterday in Orange, Texas. The clarity at my location was far better than two other Houston stations 610 & 790 licensed to operate with greater power.
 
I could hear this particular 250 watt AM signal where I was working yesterday in Orange, Texas. The clarity at my location was far better than two other Houston stations 610 & 790 licensed to operate with greater power.
Well 650 is omnidirectional, has great ground conductivity and is at the low end of the band.. 610 and 790 on the other hand are directional south from the north side of Houston.
 
Interesting fact: Houston's population in 1930 was about 10% of what it is now.

That was after the population doubled from what it was in 1920. Exponential growth that hasn't stopped.
Prior to the “Great Storm of 1900” it was Galveston that was the population and economic center of southeast Texas. Subsequent hurricanes, plus the creation of the Houston Ship Channel and related port facilities, convinced people to move further inland. Huge growth after WWII, but missed NARBA by a few years.
 
Huge growth after WWII, but missed NARBA by a few years.
NARBA did little to add high power or clear channel facilities. All that was done in the late 20's with the Federal Radio Commissioin and in the early 30's with the FCC. All NARBA did was move stations around a bit on the dial and classify each nation's clear channels to afford them protection.
 
Back to 97.1. I just heard them mention how they're now on 92.9 HD2. They also mentioned their HD3 format which is still silent. They did say something along the lines of "more ways of listening to Country Legends" alongside 97.1.
They are also pushing the Country Legends app as a way of listening.

Was amused at one promo I heard on 97.1 which promoted the new simulcast on 92.9 HD-2 as a way of hearing Country Legends in “high definition” which is of course a misuse of the “HD” moniker. Also redundant as 97.1 has HD so anyone with an HD receiver is already listening that way.😖

Also noticed that CL is promoting 92.9 HD-3 as “Texas Red Dirt Country.” That format exists in a few Texas markets; have wondered how it would do here on a primary signal, though some claim it skews too old.

Speaking of audio quality, Country Legends on 97.1 is nicely processed, sounding crisp, clean, and alive while avoiding the loudness wars that plague many FM stations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HTX
That format exists in a few Texas markets; have wondered how it would do here on a primary signal, though some claim it skews too old.
That format never does better than being the #3 country station in a market... except in Waco, where there are only two full-signal country stations, WACO has a 9.6 and Texas Country KRMX has a 3.6.

Texas Country has a very vocal, but small, audience (hampered by the fact that no one can ever agree on exactly where the music's boundaries lie). I am a fan of the music, and have programmed it before... but the reality is It is a 1.0 to 2.0 share format on average. Here's how the format does by market, most of these being on competitive signals:
1. Waco - 3.6
2. San Angelo - 2.4
3. Wichita Falls - 2.0
4. Abilene - 1.7
5t. Austin - 1.3
5t. Bryan/College Station - 1.3
7. Lubbock - 0.9
 
Last edited:
That format never does better than being the #3 country station in a market... except in Waco, where there are only two full-signal country stations, WACO has a 9.6 and Texas Country KRMX has a 3.6.

Texas Country has a very vocal, but small, audience (hampered by the fact that no one can ever agree on exactly where the music's boundaries lie). I am a fan of the music, and have programmed it before... but the reality is It is a 1.0 to 2.0 share format on average. Here's how the format does by market, most of these being on competitive signals:
1. Waco - 3.6
2. San Angelo - 2.4
3. Wichita Falls - 2.0
4. Abilene - 1.7
5t. Austin - 1.3
5t. Bryan/College Station - 1.3
7. Lubbock - 0.9
I assume the Lubbock station on the list is KRBL, which is apparently about to be sold to a non-comm operator, which probably means the format is toast.

Also assume the Austin station is KOKE, which may be on thin ice. Sibling KTXX recently flipped formats and is in the process of being sold, and speculation has begun about the future of the Country format on KOKE. Owner Austin Genuine Radio might be cashing out before station valuations fall further.

The format is intriguing, thus my thought about trying it on a Houston rimshot or translator. But the market demographics and signal dynamics probably make it a non-starter.
 
Was amused at one promo I heard on 97.1 which promoted the new simulcast on 92.9 HD-2 as a way of hearing Country Legends in “high definition” which is of course a misuse of the “HD” moniker. Also redundant as 97.1 has HD so anyone with an HD receiver is already listening that way.😖
I know one of the slogans on 106.9 HD2 says “expand in high definition”. I think 107.5 HD2 also mentions high definition. But 97.1 HD1 has much higher bandwidth than 92.9 HD2 so it’s weird that’s how they’re pushing it.
 
Texas Country has a very vocal, but small, audience (hampered by the fact that no one can ever agree on exactly where the music's boundaries lie). I am a fan of the music, and have programmed it before...
The boundary is probably the music of Mean Gene Kelton and the Die Hards.
 
Audio chain seems to have problems this morning on 97.1… audio is pretty quiet and only hearing the right channel on the tuner in my truck. No HD or RDS metadata either.
 
Mattress Mack and Gallery Furniture was brought up earlier. For a number of years during baseball season Mattress Mack has run a promotion with the following pitch: “Buy $3,000 worth of furniture, and if the Astros ‘win it all’ the furniture is free, free, free!!!”

Gallery Furniture is an official sponsor of the Astros, so the use of the team in the promotion is legit. Note that Mack never says “win the World Series” as he has no deal with MLB.

Now, seeing that you have to first buy a certain price level of furniture, and the promotion is based on a sporting competition outcome, could it be considered a type of lottery, with “free furniture” (actually a reimbursement) as a prize? Could that be considered gambling income, subject to taxes?

This reminds me of an incident with an advertiser for a station I was working at 40+ years ago. An RV dealer had a promotion in which a customer would first buy an RV, then would literally “spin the wheel” for a variety of additional savings. Well, the lawyers quickly shut that down, as it was considered an illegal lottery as you first had to buy the RV. The promotion was changed to where you spun the wheel first, then a deal was made. Cheesy, but a true story.

So how should the Gallery Furniture promotion be considered in terms of gambling?

The difference between the furniture promotion and the RV promotion is that spinning the wheel after buying an RV offered something extra that could be different for each person. I know it seems like a subtle difference, but it's enough of a difference to affect the legality, at least in many jurisdictions. "Buy a sandwich and get one free if the team wins" or "spend at least $50 on meat this weekend and get 50 cents/gallon off at our gas station" is seen one way while "buy a car and spin the wheel of prizes" is a lottery if you don't spin the wheel first. In Springfield, MO, I used to visit the Price Cutter liquor department every time I shopped there. It frequently offered deals where you could fill out a coupon, mail it in with your grocery receipt, and a beer or liquor company would reimburse a part of your purchase. I rarely ever bought the company's beverages because, in Missouri, requiring someone to purchase alcohol to participate in a promotion is illegal. Those coupons always had disclaimers in the fine print that said something to the effect of, "Purchase is only required in the following states," which it would then list.

When I lived in Kansas City, Brandsmart, which was an electronics and appliance store, used to offer a similar promotion, usually centered around the Kansas City Chiefs. I would usually be something like spend at least $400 the week before a certain game, and your purchase would be refunded if the Chiefs ran a kickoff back for a touchdown, blocked a punt, etc. during the next game. One year, it had to refund all purchases of $400 or more after the Chiefs shut out the San Diego Chargers. It was an insurance contest. Brandsmart would buy an insurance policy before the contest, and the insurance would cover at least the cost of the merchandise refunded if not the profit margin. During the time I lived in the area, Brandsmart only refunded merchandise that one time, and that insurance company wouldn't do business with the chain the rest of the year.

Not sure about the tax implications. As a general rule, Uncle Sam will take his cut if you win too much. I know Texas doesn't have an income tax, but, when I last lived there, my paycheck was my only income. So, I don't know if Texas has a tax on unearned income. Some states with no income tax distinguish between earned and unearned income. In other words, you don't pay income tax on your paycheck, but you do on dividends and capital gains.

(EDIT: Found a thread about a prior Gallery Furniture promo, and, if your purchase is refunded in said promo, you apparently receive a 1099 for the value of the furniture, which is not necessarily the retail cost. So, you would seem to be required to report and pay taxes on the furniture you won.)
 
Last edited:
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom