E
engineering
Guest
Does any body knows is XENVA2 even exist??...there is an FCC record that shows to have 250W at night and 500 during the day,but i cant find it on the dial
-
Get involved.
We want your input!
Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.
After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.
After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/
Thanks in advance and have fun!
RadioDiscussions Administrators
> Does any body knows is XENVA2 even exist??...there is an FCC
> record that shows to have 250W at night and 500 during the
> day,but i cant find it on the dial
XENVA is a place holder call used many times in international notifications. The NVA stands for "nueva" or "new" and these notifications are mostly done to stop the US using all the frequencies on the border or pumpling high power towards Mexico.
>
> record that shows to have 250W at night and 500 during the
> day,but i cant find it on the dial
XENVA is a place holder call used many times in international notifications. The NVA stands for "nueva" or "new" and these notifications are mostly done to stop the US using all the frequencies on the border or pumpling high power towards Mexico.
>
> > Does any body knows is XENVA2 even exist??...there is an
> FCC
> > record that shows to have 250W at night and 500 during the
>
> > day,but i cant find it on the dial
>
> XENVA is a place holder call used many times in
> international notifications. The NVA stands for "nueva" or
> "new" and these notifications are mostly done to stop the US
> using all the frequencies on the border or pumpling high
> power towards Mexico.
> >
>
Pumping high power towards Mexico??? HAHAHA Please pump all the high power we (the US) can get away with!!! Jeeez
> FCC
> > record that shows to have 250W at night and 500 during the
>
> > day,but i cant find it on the dial
>
> XENVA is a place holder call used many times in
> international notifications. The NVA stands for "nueva" or
> "new" and these notifications are mostly done to stop the US
> using all the frequencies on the border or pumpling high
> power towards Mexico.
> >
>
Pumping high power towards Mexico??? HAHAHA Please pump all the high power we (the US) can get away with!!! Jeeez
> > > Does any body knows is XENVA2 even exist??...there is an
>
> > FCC
> > > record that shows to have 250W at night and 500 during
> the
> >
> > > day,but i cant find it on the dial
> >
> > XENVA is a place holder call used many times in
> > international notifications. The NVA stands for "nueva" or
>
> > "new" and these notifications are mostly done to stop the
> US
> > using all the frequencies on the border or pumpling high
> > power towards Mexico.
> > >
> >
> Pumping high power towards Mexico??? HAHAHA Please pump all
> the high power we (the US) can get away with!!! Jeeez
Mexico for decades has been limited in what it can do on AM in the states at or near the border because US radio developed earlier and stations from Louisiana to California protect other US stations by shoving their night signals towards Mexico.
>
>
> > FCC
> > > record that shows to have 250W at night and 500 during
> the
> >
> > > day,but i cant find it on the dial
> >
> > XENVA is a place holder call used many times in
> > international notifications. The NVA stands for "nueva" or
>
> > "new" and these notifications are mostly done to stop the
> US
> > using all the frequencies on the border or pumpling high
> > power towards Mexico.
> > >
> >
> Pumping high power towards Mexico??? HAHAHA Please pump all
> the high power we (the US) can get away with!!! Jeeez
Mexico for decades has been limited in what it can do on AM in the states at or near the border because US radio developed earlier and stations from Louisiana to California protect other US stations by shoving their night signals towards Mexico.
>
E
engineering
Guest
> > > > Does any body knows is XENVA2 even exist??...there is
> an
> >
> > > FCC
> > > > record that shows to have 250W at night and 500 during
>
> > the
> > >
> > > > day,but i cant find it on the dial
> > >
> > > XENVA is a place holder call used many times in
> > > international notifications. The NVA stands for "nueva"
> or
> >
> > > "new" and these notifications are mostly done to stop
> the
> > US
> > > using all the frequencies on the border or pumpling high
>
> > > power towards Mexico.
> > > >
> > >
>
> Mexico for decades has been limited in what it can do on AM
> in the states at or near the border because US radio
> developed earlier and stations from Louisiana to California
> protect other US stations by shoving their night signals
> towards Mexico.
>
Thanks for the XENVA2 information David,does the US use the same system??? i mean with similar call letter???
> an
> >
> > > FCC
> > > > record that shows to have 250W at night and 500 during
>
> > the
> > >
> > > > day,but i cant find it on the dial
> > >
> > > XENVA is a place holder call used many times in
> > > international notifications. The NVA stands for "nueva"
> or
> >
> > > "new" and these notifications are mostly done to stop
> the
> > US
> > > using all the frequencies on the border or pumpling high
>
> > > power towards Mexico.
> > > >
> > >
>
> Mexico for decades has been limited in what it can do on AM
> in the states at or near the border because US radio
> developed earlier and stations from Louisiana to California
> protect other US stations by shoving their night signals
> towards Mexico.
>
Thanks for the XENVA2 information David,does the US use the same system??? i mean with similar call letter???
>>
> Thanks for the XENVA2 information David,does the US use the
> same system??? i mean with similar call letter???
>
I have never seen the US reserve potential operations this way. This is distinctly Mexican, and obviously an effort to prevent someone int he US from fileing for a station on the same frequency near the border.
Canada has been eliminating AMs quite agressively, but they preserve the notification so no US station can improve facilities or create a new station in the protected areas.
> Thanks for the XENVA2 information David,does the US use the
> same system??? i mean with similar call letter???
>
I have never seen the US reserve potential operations this way. This is distinctly Mexican, and obviously an effort to prevent someone int he US from fileing for a station on the same frequency near the border.
Canada has been eliminating AMs quite agressively, but they preserve the notification so no US station can improve facilities or create a new station in the protected areas.
> I have seen a few "place holders" in the FCC data base for
> U.S. AM stations. They are simply listed as "NEW".
>
Those are CPs that have not had calls assigned.
> U.S. AM stations. They are simply listed as "NEW".
>
Those are CPs that have not had calls assigned.
Indeed there are "placeholdes" listed as "NEW" in the FCC database.
For example, put Facility ID 99196 into the CDBS search. Been in the database since 17-Jan 1984 and is in the International tab as "USCAN Proposed".
1 kw NDA Day/night in Weyser ID. (Weiser's spelled wrong in the FCC database.)
Ask any consulting engineer about them.
For example, put Facility ID 99196 into the CDBS search. Been in the database since 17-Jan 1984 and is in the International tab as "USCAN Proposed".
1 kw NDA Day/night in Weyser ID. (Weiser's spelled wrong in the FCC database.)
Ask any consulting engineer about them.
> Indeed there are "placeholdes" listed as "NEW" in the FCC
> database.
>
> For example, put Facility ID 99196 into the CDBS search.
O records Shown.
> Been in the database since 17-Jan 1984 and is in the
> International tab as "USCAN Proposed".
I never saw any of these, but I guess I never looked. Are these pending competitve applications, by any chance? I just never heard of an allocation on AM that was not "created" by somewone applying for it. If there is a competive app, it would "exist" as an unspecified facility, since each applicant would be potentially for a different facility.
>
> 1 kw NDA Day/night in Weyser ID. (Weiser's spelled wrong in
> the FCC database.)
Is there an application?
The FCC database only shows a licensed station for that city.
> database.
>
> For example, put Facility ID 99196 into the CDBS search.
O records Shown.
> Been in the database since 17-Jan 1984 and is in the
> International tab as "USCAN Proposed".
I never saw any of these, but I guess I never looked. Are these pending competitve applications, by any chance? I just never heard of an allocation on AM that was not "created" by somewone applying for it. If there is a competive app, it would "exist" as an unspecified facility, since each applicant would be potentially for a different facility.
>
> 1 kw NDA Day/night in Weyser ID. (Weiser's spelled wrong in
> the FCC database.)
Is there an application?
The FCC database only shows a licensed station for that city.
> > Indeed there are "placeholdes" listed as "NEW" in the FCC
> > database.
> >
> > For example, put Facility ID 99196 into the CDBS search.
>
> O records Shown.
Wrong search engine. go to:
http://svartifoss2.fcc.gov/prod/cdbs/pubacc/prod/app_sear.htm
> > Been in the database since 17-Jan 1984 and is in the
> > International tab as "USCAN Proposed".
>
> I never saw any of these, but I guess I never looked. Are
> these pending competitve applications, by any chance? I just
> never heard of an allocation on AM that was not "created" by
> somewone applying for it. If there is a competive app, it
> would "exist" as an unspecified facility, since each
> applicant would be potentially for a different facility.
see below
> >
> > 1 kw NDA Day/night in Weyser ID. (Weiser's spelled wrong
> in
> > the FCC database.)
>
> Is there an application?
No. The FCC put it in as a theoretical.
> The FCC database only shows a licensed station for that
> city.
>
These are place holders negotiated in the agreement between Canada and the US.
There is thusly no application. The one on 990 is for sure a placeholder. I had a consulting firm suggest it before the AM Auction happened. A lot of the place holders have been taken by stations since they were negotiated and most recently the AM Auction.
> > database.
> >
> > For example, put Facility ID 99196 into the CDBS search.
>
> O records Shown.
Wrong search engine. go to:
http://svartifoss2.fcc.gov/prod/cdbs/pubacc/prod/app_sear.htm
> > Been in the database since 17-Jan 1984 and is in the
> > International tab as "USCAN Proposed".
>
> I never saw any of these, but I guess I never looked. Are
> these pending competitve applications, by any chance? I just
> never heard of an allocation on AM that was not "created" by
> somewone applying for it. If there is a competive app, it
> would "exist" as an unspecified facility, since each
> applicant would be potentially for a different facility.
see below
> >
> > 1 kw NDA Day/night in Weyser ID. (Weiser's spelled wrong
> in
> > the FCC database.)
>
> Is there an application?
No. The FCC put it in as a theoretical.
> The FCC database only shows a licensed station for that
> city.
>
These are place holders negotiated in the agreement between Canada and the US.
There is thusly no application. The one on 990 is for sure a placeholder. I had a consulting firm suggest it before the AM Auction happened. A lot of the place holders have been taken by stations since they were negotiated and most recently the AM Auction.
- Status